How we parted with bourgeois

I saw many opinions on the blogs here: they say, "another Russia" was isolated, "" lemons were isolated from the opposition. "

I want to put all the points over I. We, activists of the "other Russia", were not isolated from the opposition. These are bourgeois leaders, as they say, chose their lots without us when people from the Square of the Revolution to Bolotnaya. It was taken from us who understood that it should not be left in any case. Who understood that it was necessary to stay on the Revolution Square, that the chance to win on December 10 was only there, at the strategically ideal point of the city.

Yes, I again and again annoyingly returning to this day, since it was on this tragic day that our road, the Nalzbolov and mine, and the road of the leaders of the bourgeoisie dispersed. And not at all through our fault. But by their arbitrariness.

On December 10, I went to the Revolution Square in full confidence that from there we all tens of thousands of protesters, including the leaders of the bourgeoisie, will move to the Lyuban Square and, having overcome only a few hundred meters, we will be at the building of the Central Election Commission and from there we will present our requirement - to cancel the results of the elections on December 4, because otherwise we will not leave the CEC building.

Yes, I realized that on the eve of December 9, campaign for leaving to Bolotnaya Square was already conducted. But I did not imagine the grandiose scale of this agitation, nor the effect that this agitation would have on protest masses. The day before, I resolutely spoke out against the departure to Bolotnaya, but I underestimated the degree of influence of the bourgeois leaders. Their combined authority was, alas, more than my personal authority. And their information capabilities, it turned out, exceed my modest resources. It turned out that they are huge, their capabilities.

However, it should be understood that the decision to leave the Bolotnaya was originally made by a narrow group of persons, selflessly, without consulting with most political parties in the opposition and with groups of civilian activists. In particular, no one contacted and consulted with me.

I can’t call my authorship of betrayal (otherwise) on December 10 later confirmed Nemtsov, Parkhomenko, Ryzhkov, Gudkov. The nationalists were not notified and learned about the "outcome" from the Revolution Square to the Bolotnaya Post Factum. The “left” represented by Anastasia Udaltsova and Sergey Udaltsov were applicants to the rally and on December 8 and 9 opposed the departure. But the leaders of the bourgeoisie managed to break their resistance by December 10.

As a result, it turned out that Nemtsov-Parkenko-Khudkov “bent” “bent” the entire opposition, including, for example, influential Evgeny Chirikov: at first she resolutely opposed the departure from the Revolution Square, but then, apparently, did not dare to stay among the minority. Only the National Bolsheviks and the civil activists sympathized with us did not bent.

Thus, the decision was made without us, in general, a narrow group of people who wanted to take possession of a folk protest and resorted to the help of the authorities.

The National Bolsheviks could not go to Bolotnaya. Nemtsov/Ryzhkov/Parkhomenko/Gudkov knew that we would not go to Bolotnaya, because we were convinced that leaving is both a betrayal and a guaranteed defeat. And the fact that we will not go to Bolotnaya was part of their plans.

Our fundamentality was part of their plans. Bourgeois leaders have always considered me as an uncomfortable, experienced, honest and fundamental policy, as a harsh criticism of their erroneous actions. As a ruthless criticism of their actions. As an experienced veteran of the anti -Putin movement and as a serious competitor in the struggle for minds. Therefore, getting rid of me in this way, putting me in front of the failed fact when I had to either join or be left alone, it was beneficial for them.

So let them not try today, that it was Limonov self -isolated. They put the “other Russia” party before the choice: either to bent and continue to dance under their puffs on the swamps, or to remain in political isolation. We met their expectations. We preferred political isolation to the political betrayal of the interests of society.

Eliminating us - serious competitors, leading the protest, the bourgeois leaders did everything they could: they led a protest movement to defeat.

In addition to the National Bolsheviks, the rest of the opposition bent and sang and danced under their puffs. Both the left and the nationalists did not show independence, the bourgeoisie crushed them.

It is interesting that the leaders of the bourgeoisie continue to support in their influence of the "angry townspeople" the conviction that there is no defeat. Well, how is it that when there is a victory of power and repression after the victory of the authorities? Well, you are dug up, all those who are intoxicated by the number of citizens who are uselessly entering Moscow streets in winter and spring! Overwhelm, and you realize that the chances are missed, that the authorities have won. And we could defeat.

No, they do not calm down and continue their activities that negatively affect the fate of our country.

The leaders of the "creative class" just got me again. I am not an opponent of progress and modernity, but the events around the Pussy Riot case are simply depressing me.

Instead of a conflict with the regime, a creative class with a passion worthy of better use rushed to inflate this story as a professional bully, involved in a tram fight. And later, when a wound formed in society, all kinds of actresses, singers, singers, actors, analysts and professors took an enthusiasm in this wound to poke around.

As a result, our society has just survived a tragic split: adherents of tradition on one side and noisy nickels-progressists (well, almost satanists!) On the other. We need him, this fratricidal conflict in society? No. The main task is our conflict with the authorities, getting rid of the irremovable power that seized the country.

You would have measured your passions, gentlemen! They would not be so dusty.

There are too many bourgeoisies in the life of our society. It is necessary to reduce its share. This Leviathan, if allowed him, swallows us all.

Judge for yourself. We have a bourgeois group of Putin in power. For a long time, her banner was the liberal vivisector Mr. Kudrin. Well, a little less vivisector than Mr. Gaidar was, but also a ruthless to the people. Having left the government, Mr. Kudrin found a place among bourgeois relatives on Sakharov Avenue, and although the people booed him, the bourgeois opposition recognized him relatives and relatives. In fact, the whole political life in Russia has now come to conflict for power between the two groups of the bourgeoisie, personified to the authorities - Meres Putin and Medvedev, and for the opposition - gentlemen of Navalny and Nemtsov. (Not necessarily by them, but close to these gentlemen.)

With this state of things should be tied, the dominance of the bourgeoisie should be stopped.

The Party "Another Russia" takes a step in this direction. We put forward our candidate in the elections of the mayor of Khimki. The bourgeois proteges of Chirikova, Mivol, and how many of them there will still be opposed by Sergey Medvedev, an activist of another Russia, who was born and raised in Khimki, the loader of the River Port Hymok, a former political prisoner, 29 years old.