What inspires:
1. The first, in December, a general civil action with absolute dominance of the left, not only on the procession (which is not new), but also on the stands. This is, of course, the result of several factors-the aggravation of the socio-economic situation, the objective field flowering, the growing pressure of the left inside the opposition activist mass and, of course, the sharp statement of the forum of the left forces about the inadmissibility of the repeat of the liberal revenge.
The route was compiled in such a way that the boulevard divided the human stream into two columns - the right and left. One of the LiveJournal of the Juzors was perfectly expressed about the ratio of forces: "Lefts were on the left, and on the right-liberals, democrats and nationalists." That is, the left amounted to at least half of the participants, and in the second half the rest of the noev ark was located.
2. 80% of the performances were one way or another left and acutely: Udaltsov, Klychkov, Ponomarev, Shargunov, Demidov, Sakhnin, Zommer, representatives of the workers of trade unions, a test pilot, paratroopers. Among the four co-hosts of the rally, the most noticeable, spectacular and piercing was the beautiful revolutionary Isabelle Magkoeva with a red bow on his chest. The speaking nationalists ... did not say a word about their usual sores :). In the speech of Ilya Konstantinov, the most commonly repeated word was the word "revolution". Belov-Potkin, holding a baby in his arms, who managed to return his mother separated with him, contrary to expectations, did not speak about RLO and HKK, but about the poor, large families and social injustice. Of the status liberals, only Nemtsov and Kasparov protruded, well, half-webral-half-dramatic Navalny. Unlike previous marches, finally spells about the “honest elections”, re-election, and other mantras of the December-to people slowly but surely begin to finish somewhere, that the train had already gone slightly and it was time to change the record. As the press, the only ones who have a program and constructive proposals correctly notes correctly, are left -wing. The program of liberals and the celebrating public fits completely in two words - "Putin, go away."
3. The observers were struck not only by the diametrically changed situation on the rostrum of the rally, but also by its resolution, the content of which became known in advance. After the content of the resolution leaked into the press, almost the entire liberal mass, previously reinforced -concrete occupied the rostrum, immediately refused to participate in the march. Officially, Kudrin, Prokhorov, Ryzhkov, Yavlinsky, Milov, went to Tina, waved his tail, Ksyusha Sobchak, was not observed on the rostrum of the usual abundance of the "creative intelligentsia" in the person of the Akunin-Ulytsk-Imtericians-as the cow licked the tongue :)). But the funniest is, of course, the situation with Nemtsov :))))).
Nemtsov, as you already understood, is our heavy cross for many centuries :). He works as a score, and his social role consists in the personification of the "terrible 90s" and "unnatural union of the left and liberal agents of the State Department and the occupiers of the Russian land." He guesses about this role and will fulfill it as much as it takes :). Since, unlike other liberal figures, he has no support for him, he has nowhere to go, and he is doomed to drag up to the Anpilovsky grandmothers and Udaltsov’s fellows to Korokovin's stumps. On the other hand, he has no responsibility to anyone, which would not be dragged :). It was very funny on the eve of the march to read the Nemtsovsky sobs in his blog, where he clumsily tried to justify himself in front of the liberal audience, why there would be one left -handed manner on the rostrum and the entire resolution consists of left -handed demands :))). You can enjoy the Echo of Moscow website with this charm, there is literally something like this: “My liberal friends reproach me that we have included in the resolution of the requirements of the left, but the left-handed is nothing to do with it, but it simply requires the situation. For example, freezing housing and communal services-is this the left requirement? This is just a requirement of time. Or, for example, the need for free education and free healthcare-well, what is it in this it is just a compliance with the constitution? Other :))). Well, okay, not yet evening. To the next march (October 20, by the way, will be) we will sprinkle the requirement of the nationalization of everything and everything, and let Nemtsov and Kasparov read it, hahaha :)))
A change in the agenda of marches also affected visual agitation - the design of the streets. There used to be solid "honest elections", but now 
4. For the first time for all the time (and the year, imagine, did not have passed) in the march officially participated in the Communist Party of the Communist Party. Andrei Klychkov, head of the Communist Party of the Communist Party of the Communist Party in the Moscow City Duma, performed perfectly from the rostrum and led the Communist-Zyuganovites, holding the pearl of the alternative (Nyzuganov) city committee of the Communist Party of the Communist Party Vladimir Lakeev. It is so touching that I almost wept. By the way, this is evidence of the recovery of the situation in the metropolitan Zyuganovsky city committee-until Zyuganov does not mumble, and all sorts of eccentrics in his close circle are tambourine about the Orange Otvya, the MGK of the Communist Party made an official decision on participation and delegated Klychkov to the rostrum. Nice and commendable.
5. The bulk of the general civil activists and individual politicians adjoins the left column. Representatives of university science (scientific and educational column), trade unions, veteran organizations, paratroopers and military sailors were going on with the left. In the left column, I gladly met a dozen classmates with a dozen MSU (among the Istfaks of Moscow State University always with brains and conscience are all right). I am proud of the Alma Mother.
6. Personal achievement - it neutralized the provocateur personally :)). The clown, known in narrow circles, nicknamed Moska Runet turned the American star-striped flag, which was immediately selected from his vigilant levofrontovites, but in a couple of seconds they managed to take a photo that this miracle helpfully sends over the network. The provocateur received from me quiet good cuffs along the ridge, and only my good mood and a wasteful character saved him - I generously decided not to scratch the physiognomy. I wonder if the Kremlin propagandists understand that their fairy tales about the State Department agents are grunts about the Moskina level? ...
What upset:
1. The protest is pushed out. The number of protesters does not decrease, but does not grow, remaining approximately at the same level. The expansion of the protest base and the increase in the number of active participants is compensated by the outfield of disappointed, impatient, fell into protest ranks by accident, who did not manage to accept certain protest leaders, etc.
2. People still do not understand the relationship between the real socio-economic situation and their opportunity to influence it. Individual scenarios of behavior prefer the collective action - “maybe it will suck”, “maybe we will agree with the authorities”, “maybe it will carry”.
3. The desire of many leaders to step on the old rake is to play the elections (both official and fake). In general, it is time to end with selective cretinism. Yesterday's performance in the State Duma clearly showed what we have at all any elections. To change the situation by pressure, we do not have the strength, and the electoral path in our country is excluded.
4. Absolute helplessness of mass (even organized) in front of a repressive apparatus. The outcome of any action completely and completely depends on the desire or unwillingness of the police and other specialses to knead the bones. The current march ended peacefully (well, that is, almost), but could end like May 6, and this does not depend on our behavior and our actions.