The third episode of Comrade Mamontov’s television work “Provocateurs” about Pussy Riot has been published... Or is it actually about something else?
What is Mamontov telling us (sorry, not to us, but to those who watch the Russia channel and trust it)? And what does it show?
Let's read the information messages:
In his film, Mamontov calls the former member of the art group “War” and the husband of the convicted Nadezhda Tolokonnikova, Pyotr Verzilov, a provocateur who contributed to the arrest of Pussy Riot members... We are talking about a PR campaign of “opponents of the regime” ( from here )
“Provocateurs” traces the idea of a connection between actions in support of PussyRiot and the activities of Sergei Udaltsov’s associates, who allegedly negotiated with the “Georgian provocateur” Givi Targamadze... ( from here )
The second part was shown in early September. It says that Boris Berezovsky was allegedly involved in the action... (from here)
I remember that a little earlier, an interesting idea about the involvement of opposition representatives in the provocation with a punk prayer was expressed in the film “Anatomy of Protest-2” on the NTV channel and became the basis for the ICR to initiate a criminal case against Udaltsov, who is suspected of preparing for mass riots...
How interesting! It turns out that two competing channels simultaneously publish the same information, which is regarded by many people (including those directly related to the events that took place) as a lie! That is, in reality everything was not like that, but two federal television channels interpret what happened... in the same way!
Moreover! Based on this interpretation, Putin first claims in Tokmenev’s program that the girls did not sing anything about him - it was edited later. That is, the stupid girls who insulted the CSU parishioners were then framed for politics... (!!! - apparently, this statement is not intended for those who understand that video clips are filmed exactly like this - first a video sequence, which is then edited to an already recorded song in the studio)
And then, based on this interpretation, a criminal case is opened against Udaltsov!
My friends. These films say one thing. Federal television channels create an artificial reality for their viewers. If something unplanned and unwanted happened, then YOU MUST CONSIDER that it happened exactly as Russia 1 and NTV show...
The disgusting thing about it all is not only that they are brazenly and cynically inventing our reality for us, but Mr. Kulistikov likes this game so much that he also allows himself obscene poems - like, what, did you eat? How can I help you cleverly? Shameful suckers...
The disgusting thing is that the essence and meaning of the profession of journalist and television in general, which should work with existing, and not fictitious reality, is completely replaced. And at the same time, based on a non-existent reality, the authorities are in a hurry to solder real deadlines to those they don’t like!
There was a joke in Soviet times: “We were born to make Kafka come true...” It looks like they’ve already done it?
One thing is not clear - do they (those curators and inventors of this version of the latest events in Moscow - who certainly exist, unlike the “curators” of the girls from the punk group) seriously think that with the help of this substitution they can convincingly solve their problem?
It seems they are dumber and more confident than we thought. And this also makes me feel uneasy. It is known that a fool with initiative is more dangerous than a fool...