The Investigative Committee opened a criminal case against oppositionist Sergei Udaltsov after checking facts from the film “Anatomy of a Protest-2,” RIA Novosti reports, citing department official Vladimir Markin.
A criminal case has been initiated under Articles 30 and 212 of the Criminal Code (“Preparation for organizing mass riots”). According to him, searches are being conducted at Udaltsov and other defendants in the case.
http://www.gazeta.ru/politics/news/2012/10/17/n_2574833.shtml
It is possible to reclassify it as treason during the investigation.
Udaltsov to sit (up to ten years). This is obvious. But they will need a group case. So far, only Olga Romanova has been called in for questioning.
With such plans, why not allow the kindergarten coordinating council to gather on election day? At the same time, record everyone and film them.
The car is working. And it is impossible to become a part of this machine, as the pseudo-oppositionists who are still running for elections are planning to do, without sharing with it responsibility for the results of this work.
However. what am I talking about? After all, these are just costs of political business. It is this, and not politics, that the opposition establishment is engaged in. For these people, what they will do with Udaltsov is partly even beneficial, like the expulsion of Gudkov from the Duma, just as the oligarchs benefited from the expulsion of Gusinsky and Berezovsky and the arrest of Khodorkovsky. Competitors are being eliminated.
Well. what? Shall we draw historical parallels? There are two of them. And how future spies and traitors rejoiced at this. that their competitors were being eliminated. And the ways in which they cleaned up (those who rejoiced too). Through "cooking"
“Another important expansion of the treason clause was its application “through Article 19 of the Criminal Code” - “through intent.” That is, there was no treason, but the investigator saw an intention to change - and this was enough to give a full term, as and for actual treason. True, Article 19 proposes to punish not for intention, but for preparation, but when read dialectically, intention can be understood as preparation and “preparation of the punished in the same way (i.e., with equal punishment) as itself. crime" (Criminal Code). In general, we do not distinguish intentions from the crime itself, and this is the superiority of Soviet legislation over bourgeois legislation!"
http://lib.ru/PROZA/SOLZHENICYN/gulag.txt
upd : " The department opened a criminal case under Part 1 of Article 30 and Part 1 of Article 212 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, that is, preparation for organizing mass riots" in Moscow and in other regions of the Russian Federation. In addition to Udaltsov, the defendants in the case were his assistant Konstantin Lebedev, assistant to the deputy of the State Duma of the Russian Federation Ilya Ponomarev Leonid Razvozzhaev, and a number of other persons. If the suspects are found guilty, they face up to 10 years in prison.
“Taking part in the meeting from the Georgian side were the Chairman of the Georgian Parliamentary Committee on Defense and Security Givi Targamadze, the Consul of Georgia in Moldova Mikheil Iashvili, as well as three of their assistants,” the department added.
http://www.newsru.com/russia/17oct2012/udal.html
Here's a group deal for you. Moreover, it seems that Ponomarev tried in vain to fit into the system. Although they can fit in, but for a higher fee.
And at the same time there is a casus belli with Georgia. For example. through the demand for the extradition of these persons to Russia.