Hello!
Thanks everyone for your support. Although the best support has already been provided - your reposts, active participation in the discussion and development of the topic.
Anya outlined the main outline , I will add more.
On November 3, the Internet actually went down.
The provider company reported that everything was in order on their part. On November 4 and 5, I called the company’s technicians. I was told to look at what data was displayed when connecting or disconnecting the Internet and dictate the IP address that appeared. I started dictating, they were terribly surprised, they said that this address was not mine, they said that it was anti-virus programs that were conflicting, they told me to leave one and call tomorrow to agree on a time and check the cable (in Barnaul there were cases when competing companies cut cables from clients).
Later, persons from authorities that they did not name reported that this is my dynamic address, it changes itself, but the fact is that the current company “inherited” clients, including me, from a company that did not practice dynamic addresses .
In addition, the computer settings automatically changed the time for a month, some email services became unavailable, in general, I am absolutely sure that the “office” could not have been avoided.
On the evening of the 5th they called on behalf of the technicians and invited them to the company on the morning of the 6th, as a formality, to write an application for a cable inspection. Naturally, in the company, in an office cleared of company employees, two non-technicians immediately started talking about their homeland, the interests of the state, the intrigues of NATO, etc., etc., introduced themselves as the regional SUSC, while misrepresenting the address of the regional SUSC . They asked in more detail about the work with the deputies whom I brought to the legislative bodies of the city and region, about how I carried them through without any PR, but only through their real participation in a real fight with thieves on the side of the people, how they removed the mayor and the mayor’s office and everything such. They offered to go to SUSC to explain some points on the Polish topic. They reacted extremely negatively to an attempt to call and report this. The call, of course, took place in front of the entire company - it is impossible to physically interfere with the call in such cases, and verbal opposition caused a slight scandal.
Over the phone, I repeated to my wife the false address that my comrades had given - st. Vorovskogo 115 (real address Vorovskogo St., 106). She sent a signal to the Internet. Later she contacted SUSC, where she was promised that she would be released in half an hour. In fact, it turned out to be late in the evening.
After this scandal with the call, we calmly went to SUSC
***
In the regional SUSC, it turned out that a whole department for especially important cases is dealing with the “Citizen” case (the people, by the way, are all normal, sane). The fact was that the Basmanny District Court of Moscow recognized me as a witness in the case “On the crash of 04/10/2010” and issued a ruling to investigate the circumstances of the appearance of photographs of this post , conduct a search, for which the SUSC was instructed to investigate all electronic media, photos, videos information.
Of course, the same paper provides the right to appeal the decision within 10 days and leaves no opportunity to do this, but there is nothing to be surprised about, this is in the order of things.
Together with me, a group of investigators and witnesses, provided in advance by the local police, came to the apartment and seized a computer, flash drives, a bag of disks, a kilogram of old floppy disks, a camera, old broken and working phones, all papers, notes, etc. for inventory. with any email addresses. All this was accompanied by a very long written work. Then it continued in SUSC until the end of the day. I answered many questions posed by the Basmanny Court to the investigative body.
Since I signed a non-disclosure agreement regarding the information I learned during the investigative actions, I apparently have no right to retell the questions.
But I didn't learn any new information.
All the questions were about what was written about in the very first post of the “Smolensk topic”, they were answered many times in the discussion, it’s just that the Bassmanny court in ten frets - also a familiar manner - asked about the same thing. Moreover, all the what-where-when... are formulated - another common manner - in a Jesuitical way. Statements that should be attributed to the “Citizen” (this is what the “Polish media” have suffered from) are presented as an immutable fact. You can answer anything, but the fact in these constructions is still recognized. Those. The Basmanny Court believes that on my blog I posted pictures of the “airplane crash on April 10, 2010” (which did not happen) and “photos of Polish President Kaczynski” (which I have never stated anywhere and especially will not undertake to assert now).
Why don’t I take it up - I’ll repeat it again.
L. Kaczynski’s brother identified him on the morning of April 11, 2010 only in media reports, and he himself doubted that this was his brother that same year.
The heads of all the other victims that are in the photographs are chopped, crushed, deformed, or completely separated from the body, which makes visual identification impossible. There was no genetic testing. The bodies were exhumed twice, and in two cases genetic analysis showed that other remains had been buried. Thus, in my opinion, a proper investigation should generally be conducted into the fact of the murder and begin with finding out: who actually ended up at the Severny airfield near Smolensk on April 10, 2010, when did he end up there, etc., and in Poland, again, in my opinion, we should begin to establish the place, time, and circumstances under which each of the declared “disaster victims” left reliable evidence of life and health. In other words, find the last lifetime photos and videos of the “passengers,” the vast majority of whom are public figures, the “elite.” Because if you look at the published “disaster photos”, you will find numerous evidence of the victims being in the hands of those who most likely killed them. The closest figure in the photo ( do not open to persons with weak psyches ) is taken from the back, each leg is turned 180 degrees separately , each of the arm joints is turned out, the stockings pulled over the trouser leg are worn out and damaged in the area of the feet, which can only be a consequence walking in them without shoes, and much more. In this photo ( do not open to persons with weak psyches ) you will find a ring and a bracelet that were not of interest to the mythical “Russian marauders”, about whom those “who are supposed to” spoke in the comments. Look at the nearest figure in this photo ( do not open to persons with weak psyches ) - who and in what “disasters” folded their hands palm to palm on their chest? In all these and other photos, pay attention to the dirty border under the nails and the black wrinkles on the inside of the palm - these marks can only be obtained during life, no “explosions, catastrophes”, “drags” can get dirt under the nails and in the folds of the palms.. Pay attention in all the photographs to intravital bruises on different parts of the bodies and severe, deep injuries without a drop of blood, which can only be on dead bodies. And so on, and so on, and so on. In fact, the materials highlighted the scum that did all this.
Late in the evening of November 5, after all the SUSC procedures had been completed, one of the “technicians of the provider company” asked to record a short statement on video. Why and to whom it will be shown - nothing specific was said about this, although I did not object and now do not object to any demonstration by any Polish or non-Polish media. The next day, the SUSC investigator asked to write the same statement in writing; I also went forward and said that I do not object to its demonstration by any media.
Without accusing anyone in particular of anything, but bearing in mind only the experience of giving similar interviews to the Polish media and their subsequent “translations,” I will reproduce this statement once again.
Statement
I, Anton Sizykh, am the same “Citizen from Barnaul” on whose blog a famous publication with photographs appeared.
By making this publication, I in no way set out to incite ethnic hatred between the peoples of Poland, Russia and any third countries; on the contrary, the goal was to establish the truth.
I have no doubt that there was an information operation by those forces that are precisely trying to incite interethnic enmity and mutual hatred between people in Russia and Poland. They tried to use the Russian blogosphere, including me, for their own purposes. Russian bloggers, according to their plan, were supposed to spread and substantiate yet another disinformation about the “explosion”, “execution of the bloody KGB” and other nonsense. But their result was exactly the opposite.
In my blog, in personal correspondence, in numerous interviews, I have already said and repeat now: I apologize to the relatives of the victims, to all Polish citizens who believe that the publication insulted the memory of the victims and caused moral damage. The only motive that guided me when making the publication was that the crime must be solved.
Anton SIZYKH, aka "Citizen from Barnaul"