Communal "exploits" 73 regions

After postponed, so as not to annoy the voters on the eve of the parliamentary and presidential elections, the January increase in prices for housing and communal services, the wave of communal “happiness” covered the citizens of the Russian Federation and the Ulyanovsk region among them in July-September 2012. Moreover, the numbers of the maximum indexation of tariffs, determined by the federal tariff service at 12-15 %% of the tariff growth, were everywhere blocked. And the Ulyanovsk region was in the forefront of the regions that allowed the maximum growth of tariffs. According to the monitoring of the Commission on Local Self-Government and Communal Policy of the Public Chamber of Russia, the results of which were announced in an interview with the Free Press portal by the chairman of this commission Svetlana Razvorotneva: “The record holders here Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug (47%), Chuvash Republic (41.32%), Primorsky Territory (34.96%) and the Ulyanovsk Region) and the Ulyanovsk Region) (30.37%). " Thus, the Ulyanovsk region took 4th place in the country and 2 in the Volga Federal District for the increase in prices for housing and communal services. This information posted on the AiF in Ulyanovsk website on October 18, 2012 was the subject of the trial, "was analyzed by the government of the Ulyanovsk region and was recognized as incorrect." It is not the fact of tariff growth, but the new rules for the provision of utilities introduced from September 1, 2012, including payment under the articles “Heating”, “Hot Water Supply”, “Cold Water Supply” and “Electric Superior” of certain “common house needs”, became the reason for the growth of payments above the federal 12-15 %%. This is in itself a dubious innovation, clearly in favor of sellers of services and management companies and against the interests of owners and municipal housing tenants, it was possible to postpone the regional authorities by decision of the regional authorities until 2014. But the governor and government of the Ulyanovsk region refused the deferral, showing super -chief, as in the case of social norms of consumption of services.

However, the sharpness of the problem, the potential threat of mass protests after receiving the November payments on rent and the services of housing and communal services forced the authorities, the governor Morozov, the functionaries of the United Russia to conduct a PR company in order to dissociate themselves from liability for the results of their housing and communal policy. Several meetings of the “concern” of the regional authorities were held with the current situation with promises to track, control and, if necessary, punish with all severity. “The most important problem that concerns both Ulyanovtsev and Russians as a whole is tariffs for housing and communal services,” said Sergey Morozov during the hardware meeting of the regional government on October 22, 2012. - It is necessary to constantly keep this issue in control. And, first of all, I would ask to figure out the fact that today, in a number of management companies, an unacceptable increase in the size of the fee for the maintenance and repair of the dwelling is noted. ”

The newspaper number (No. 1 for 2012) “United Russia” Ulyanovsk Regional Branch with the advanced “Sergey Morozov: Housing and Utilities of Public Control” was published with a 50-thousand-end circulation, and the Governor of the Ulyanovsk Region Sergey Morozov ordered the inspection of the validity of the fees for housing and communal services with the fat subtitle. The entire second strip of the newspaper was dedicated to tariffs. “Lawlessness in the housing and communal services should be curbed at the legislative level” The article of Tamara Dmitrieva, the head of the regional public reception leader of the United Russia party, deputy chairman of the Legislative Assembly of the Ulyanovsk Region, was entitled. The chairman of the regional commission of the Presidium of the General Council of the United Russia party on tariff policy and monitoring of services in the field of housing and communal services and energy conservation, Pyotr Stolyarov, entitled "Tariffs swell from hot water." He writes: “Only because of the change in the calculation methodology, many residents instead of 93 rubles per cubic meter of the hot water are now forced to pay several times more (!)-up to 200 rubles per cubic meter of hot water.” And further: “Of course, this is a huge growth -by 30.37%, while the maximum tariff growth index for the Ulyanovsk region is -14%, and for the city -12%. However, if you look at the structure of tariffs, due to which articles there was an increase, then, for example, the heat increased by 4%, water supply and sanitation did not change. On the other hand, the amount of the fee and repair of the house is determined by the residents themselves at the general meeting of the owners. And they are not guided by the installed growth indices, but set a fee depending on which condition the house is in, what repair work is required. If the house requires urgent repair, so the increase in rent by decision of owners can be at least 200%! Here we cannot interfere and indicate. ” This is where the dog is buried: the tenants set their own unhealthy tariffs. But not so long ago, privatized housing according to the law should have been overhaul if necessary. Did this happen often on Java? And to whom to believe? On the first page, the governor, unlike the chairman of the commission of the commission, claims that the tariffs for thermal energy did not increase by 4%, as he writes (or speaks?) Stolyarov, but “from 01.07.2012 by 4.1%, from 09/01/2012 another 2%”, that is, by a combination of interest by seven. “Tariffs for water supply, sanitation from 01.07.2012 by 1.7%, from 09/01/2012 another 1.7%”, and Stolyarov’s tariffs for “water supply, sanitation have not changed”. And all in one issue of the newspaper on different sides of the newspaper sheet. With such abilities, it is not surprising that officials from United Russia, exposed by the legislative and executive branch, can only wave their hands and puff lips. What is called (they have bureaucrats) "resorted questions."

In such a situation, a social explosion that can occur as a reaction to the anti -people policy of the United Russia and the region, is not the worst scena of events. Worse than another possible option. A variant of the stable-resistant extinction of Russia. Pensioners who share a miserable pension between communal services, medicines and meager food, with difficulty making ends meet, will be forced to either be treated or not treated, or become debtors to pay for utilities. The poor old age will become even worse and unsightly. More than 50% of working citizens who make less than the average salary in the country will go into a state of poverty from poverty. Together with them, poverty will become the destiny of their children, children of Russia, its future, as representatives of the authorities and businesses like to declare at solemn meetings and beer festivals. The process of loss of normal housing, which will be removed for communal debts, will become mass. The remaining percent of the 20-25 population of Russia, the bourgeois and their customers, a variety of servants-medical, educational, technical, cultural and other-will be forced to live in a degrading, doomed country.

The scenario of the death of Russia, Russian civilization, Russian and other peoples of our country should be stopped.