He asks to check Promsvyazbank for involvement in the raider takeover

A Just Russia deputy, Oleg Mikheev, sent parliamentary requests to the FSB, the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the Investigative Committee of Russia (ICR) and the Prosecutor General's Office with a demand to check Promsvyazbank, which, according to Just Russia, is backed by Senator Dmitry Ananyev, for involvement in the “raider takeover” of the deputy’s business . Promsvyazbank accused the deputy of “political manipulation.”

At the end of October, Promsvyazbank and Nomos Bank sent letters to State Duma Speaker Sergei Naryshkin, accusing the deputy of attempting to steal funds from these banks. A similar appeal with a request to remove immunity from the deputy was sent to the Investigative Committee.

Yesterday, Oleg Mikheev sent parliamentary requests to FSB Director Alexander Bortnikov, Chairman of the Investigative Committee Alexander Bastrykin, Prosecutor General Yuri Chaika and Minister of Internal Affairs Vladimir Kolokoltsev. In them, he asks to check the documents presented to him “on the fact of the raider seizure by Promsvyazbank of Volgoprombank, the World of Technology group of companies and the pledges of the Diamant group of companies, which were associated with Oleg Mikheev. “If violations are detected, take appropriate measures to initiate criminal proceedings against management,” writes the deputy. According to Oleg Mikheev, the “ultimate beneficiary of the bank” and the initiator of the campaign against it is the senator from the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug Dmitry Ananyev.

The text of his appeals to law enforcement (available to Kommersant) says that in 2007, the deputy sold his asset - 86% of the shares of OJSC JSCB Volgoprombank - to the brothers Dmitry and Alexey Ananyev, the ultimate beneficiaries of the Promsvyaz financial group. “Using a difficult set of circumstances, the management of OJSC Promsvyazbank put forward a number of additional strict conditions, depending on the fulfillment of which OJSC Promsvyazbank undertook to pay me for the sold shares in accordance with their market value,” writes Oleg Mikheev. As the deputy writes, he fulfilled all his obligations, unlike Promsvyazbank, which allegedly owed the deputy 1.7 billion rubles.

In addition, as the deputy assures, in 2007 he took out a loan in the amount of 1.5 billion rubles from Promsvyazbank against his collateral. until December 18, 2008 for early repayment of debts of a number of Volgoprombank borrowers. This was “one of hundreds of conditions for the purchase of Volgoprombank by Promsvyazbank,” explained Oleg Mikheev. “After this, the borrowers for whom I repaid the loan did not return the money to me, so I filed a claim against them as borrowers and against the guarantor, which, as the legal successor of Volgoprombank, is Promsvyazbank.” This amount, the deputy says, taking into account annual costs, amounts to 2.2 billion rubles. On November 26, in the arbitration court, Promsvyazbank will appeal the decision of the court of first instance, which has already confirmed the validity of the guarantee agreement of Promsvyazbank as the successor of Volgoprombank.

“Promsvyazbank was unable to prove in court that it should not pay for these debts, and it had no choice but to resort to the steps it has taken now: public distortion of information, appeal to the State Duma and law enforcement agencies. Like Georgia, which was the first to attack Ossetia and blamed Russia for starting the war, which had to wash itself of this dirt for a long time, Promsvyazbank started an information war with distorted information,” said Oleg Mikheev.

Promsvyazbank denies the parliamentarian's accusations. Daria Litvina, head of the PR and marketing department of the PromSvyazCapital group, told Kommersant that Mr. Mikheev “uses political manipulation to resolve financial issues.” “We act exclusively through the courts,” she concluded.

Dina Polina, Maxim Ivanov

Oleg Mikheev converted the kick