Translated material
Passions according to Mirzaev
The editors have a habit of listening to the RSN radio station in the morning. First the program of Roman Shchukin, and then the program of Dorenko.
Today, both Shchukin and Dorenko held a telephone vote regarding the justice or injustice of Mirzaev’s sentence. The result turned out to be the same, despite the fact that the number of people who took part in the voting for Dorenko was several times greater than for Shchukin. 29% percent think the verdict is fair and 71% think the verdict is unfair.
And here it should be noted that Dorenko, following the mood of the audience, uses neurolinguistic programming. Dorenko repeats the same verbal construction - Mirzaev’s blow tore off Agafonov’s skull with his blow. Although in fact Agafonov’s skull was displaced by the impact of the fall.
It’s good that Dorenko understands that children need to be raised in worldly wisdom, that boorish behavior can lead to an inglorious death.
The real reason for such outrage over the verdict lies not in the merits of this particular case, but in the sea of unjust sentences that Russian judges handed down in the harsh Putin era.
Therefore, when Dorenko says in connection with the verdict to Mirzaev that he does not understand what our state is doing, he is absolutely right.
And here we can agree with Dorenko.
And again, Dorenko’s stubbornness about the fact that Mirzaev struck, and that’s the whole problem. But if Mirzaev wanted to kill, he would have struck so that Agathon would have died before he could fall. And Agafonov lived long enough after that. Agafonov lay on the hospital floor for several hours, having fallen from a gurney.