Everything is about to be clarified

A brief agenda of December: three public speeches of the main guidelines who will take place against the backdrop of talk about crisis times, the fight against corruption, reasoning about Putin’s new strategy, the struggle of clans and the contradictions between innovations and democracy. The result of its implementation is clear: now everything is very vague, and then everything will become clear.

Of course, to reduce all this together by the power of some single thought cannot in any way. Therefore, there will be simply separate facts of reality in retail, which together, perhaps, report. Well, if not they, then what about here can at least report something? But so far they are even arranged just like that, outside the alleged importance.

Announcements, three at once

“ Gazeta.ru ”: “ At noon on December 7, Dmitry Medvedev will summarize the results of the government, which he has been heading for almost 7 months. A large interview with five television channels will be released on the eve of the large press conference of Vladimir Putin and his message to the Federal Assembly .”
The publication, in particular, recalls that in April (the last major public performance of D. Medvedev) he was asked about the quantitative and qualitative composition of the protesters. Answer:
“ Impressed. Both their quantity, and their quality impressed, I can’t say anything. It was impressed simply because in recent years it was a massive exit of people in order to voice this position. This means that the authorities have no right to evade this position. The reaction to it was, and it will be .”
Further: " A month later, the State Duma adopted a whole package of repressive bills, including a sharp increase in fines for participation in rallies, on the return of criminal liability for slander, introducing the concept of a foreign agent in relation to NGOs that receive financing from abroad ."

Medvedev began ahead of time

Kommersant already has his interview , presented by the words: “ Dmitry Medvedev’s government worked for the first six months. In an interview with Kommersant, the Prime Minister talks about the future of Rosneft and ideological disputes in the White House, about the public mood and mood of Alexei Kudrin, about the“ Magnitsky Act ”and NATO plans. Finally, Dmitry Medvedev reported About the future work plan of the White House until 2018, which will be published in the near future . "
Well, there is about corruption, and about Serdyukov, and about repressions (in the sense of them) and about civil liability, and about tea with Kudrin, and about banks, and about the pension system, and even like this: " Now the situation in the economy is not crisis, but it is pre -heating ." From the side of Kommersant, D. Butrin, M. Mikhailin and G. Cherkasov worked.

Nuance

A little earlier it was reported that V. Putin would not be dismissed by the Institute of Peners, who usually stops working after the election. On December 10, he will meet with them, who " will preliminarily introduce the results of the Government of Dmitry Medvedev the main provisions of the seven election articles by Vladimir Putin ." As a source in the presidential administration told the independent newspaper, the proxies will have to " help strengthen the president’s connection with civil society ."
That is, Putin will meet with proxies after Medvedev summed up the government on the air and to his message and press conference. In general, it is interesting-everyone was silent and silent, and now Medvedev has a surge of state-appropriation, and Putin’s-well, he has protocol, but what is Medvedev and Medvedev in this difficult context to mention? Maybe he really gets sick ? Actually, nothing like that. However, the relations of the AP with the “independent newspaper” are also interesting here are also not too intimate. It just appears a little below, in one more story. And recently, they seemed to have not been special players.

"Russia-1" and Skrynnik

A day ago, Russia-1 showed the type of documentary about the life of Russian officials. The most senior is the former Minister of Agriculture E. Skrynnik, mentioned in connection with a prediction of 39 billion rubles through Rosagrolysing. The plot was called creative, "the implicit of the property." The author - A. Rogatkina, came out as part of the "special correspondent" by A. Mamontov . It is more interesting not the plot, but two of its descriptions in the media. Because there is morality there.

"Lenta.ru" was not without skepticism. In particular, it was noted that the plot of Skrynnik occupied only a small part of the entire film: “ So why,“ the implicit of the property ”suddenly became a“ hide ”film and were declared a sensation? After all, upon closer examination, this is simply the selection of quite stories about a wide variety of officials, and only the Skrynnik itself is charged with only small and dubious facts. Probably, an article played a big role, an article, an article, an article, an article, an article, an article, an article, an article . Published in the "Independent Newspaper" a few hours before the demonstration of the film . "

What is already adding conspiracyology - well, here again there is an “independent newspaper”. Which, of course, is an accident. But the very fact that with her (see more) is now confidently in the AP, something maybe it means. Well, I wonder who works with whom. Not everyone and not always with Izvestia and Lifeyus.
"Gazeta.ru" reacted to the plot about Skrynnik systematically: " Ivanov, Chemezov, Patrushev-influential security forces from Putin’s closest encirclement, Viktor Zubkov began working with Putin back in the 90s at the St. Petersburg City Hall ." And in this regard, the statement of M. Tula:

" With the return of Putin to the presidential chair, the power clans regained their influence slightly lost over the years of the presidency of Medvedev and will not miss the opportunity to use the anti-corruption campaign in their interests. Both Skrynnik and Serdyukov had a difficult relationship simultaneously with various groups of security forces and Viktor Zubkov, while at some point they lost serious patrons ."

System breakdown and clan war

G. Pavlovsky recently spoke at the top club at the invitation of the Russian managerial community (RUS) with a public lecture "How to return the trust of society." Now there is about this on Polit.ru . Selected prophecies:
“ Putin’s system, according to the expert, in the form in which it was created, is unreformed. Therefore, Putin breaks this system now, violates its rules:“ I urge you to be tolerant of this in a sense, ”the lecturer asks. - The arrival of the new often looks disgusting or idiotic. But Putin abandoned a certain option of development, meaningless in this state. Perhaps this is a good sign "".
Well, maybe it’s not bad, but it is difficult to completely feel it due to the not complete elaboration of the words "but Putin abandoned a certain version of development that is meaningless in this state." That is, the words "a certain." But then more understandable:
“ There is a war of clans at the top, which already leads to the formation of certain new coalitions within the authorities (they have not yet developed), coalitions will also be formed below,” Pavlovsky believes. “To the question of how to predict where power is with such a number of conflicting signals, Pavlovsky replied:“ I can’t say where the authorities are going, and we will find it in a fairly imminent time. And she herself will find it . "

Innovation or democracy?

It is reported that Deputy Prime Minister V. Surkov was in Skolkovo, met there with the NII employees and with some other party members (the meeting format was not indicated) and called the innovative work the "primary political task", and democracy-"luxury". Quote:
" During the meeting in Skolkovo, dedicated to the interaction of innovators and the state, Vladislav Surkov said that" he considers innovative work to be the primary political task. "" It precedes party and election, it is at the beginning of all, because if there is no high technology, if there is no labor productivity, then there is no democracy, "according to Mr. Surkov," democracy appeared exactly. Then, when technologies arose, because democracy is a luxury. "" If you have many products, then you can afford to be free. If you have few products, you will begin to tighten the rules, just out of vital necessity, ”the Deputy Prime Minister explained to the NII and party members .”
In short, the whole thing is in the number of products. Whoever has more products is more democratic. Finally clarity.

Intrigue

Yes, in the same article “Gazeta.ru”, which is also about the “plot of Skrynnik”: “ The director of the St. Petersburg Politics Foundation Mikhail Vinogradov notes that the main issue has not been resolved as part of the Kremlin’s anti -corruption campaign - the positioning of President Vladimir Putin, who has not yet made a software statement this score .”