It seems that everyone has already noted Svetlana Petrovna’s hot speech. For those who haven't read it yet (which is unlikely):
The United States, in front of the eyes of the entire amazed world, is unleashing one massacre after another. This way, apparently, the interests of the “golden billion” are resolved, but wars require human material.
The United States has created a national authority for intercountry adoption. At the same time, intermediary funds appeared, which were supposed to look for lobbyists in other countries who would facilitate the adoption and removal of children. This is the objective reality of today.
And the flow of children to America from various, including underdeveloped countries, including Russia, began. 60 thousand orphans were taken out... And even if one tenth of the orphans are tortured, used for organ transplantation or for sexual pleasure... then those fifty thousand who will be recruited for war, even with Russia, will still be enough.
I am interested in this episode not from a political point of view, but from a technological one.
The art of argument is still an art. There was a time when in Russia it was possible to engage in demagoguery without consequences for one’s political and public reputation. But not today. The political culture of the country's citizens is growing. And it has certainly reached the level where the “average citizen” can distinguish the “private opinion of a deputy” from a “reasoned thesis/counterthesis.”
I want to believe that Svetlana Goryacheva did not make up what she said. Otherwise, what kind of Duma is this, where any heresy can be given the status of law? This means that if a deputy has facts (even if indirect) that confirm his thesis, he is obliged to present them to us. A reputation takes years to build but is destroyed in 30 seconds.
But you and I are intelligent people. And, for sure, over a glass of tea we will forgive Svetlana Petrovna, we will forgive her as a woman, a mother. But to whom we definitely have no right to give forgiveness are the chairmen of the Socialist-Revolutionary Party. Who “pressured” the deputies to vote this way and not otherwise? Who “asked” colleagues to take the podium and find words to justify their actions?
And in the end, why are the regional branches of A JUST RUSSIA silent? Where is the voice of the regions? I know for sure that he exists. How long will you be afraid to speak! If you are against it, tell me! If you are in favor, then speak up. Maybe you can find adequate arguments if the leaders don’t have them.
But the country may not forgive for cowardly silence.
My conclusions are contradictory. Silence is bad. It's no better to speak in the heat of the moment. All that remains is for the deputies and the entire party to start thinking. All parties.
Think, Duma, what you say, otherwise you will remember this “muskrat” for the rest of your “Life.”