About post-New Year's "Russification" and influence

Unfortunately, I have to admit that our government managed to destroy the relevance of Voznesensky’s beloved poem , which ends with the line “There are no queues in Russia.” Now there is a queue to Russia: in it stands Gerard Depardieu with a Jewish desire to pay less and a bottle of lousy wine, and Brigitte Bardot with two sick but loyal elephants. The insanity grew stronger, gentlemen of the jury.

You know, there are such capricious little girls who, for example, do not like noodles. And so their mother cooks noodles for them, but they refuse and shout: “I won’t eat this! I won’t eat at all and I’ll die of hunger!” I imagine the capricious Mr. Depardieu in approximately the same way: “I won’t pay! I don’t want to! In fact, I’ll go to live in Russia!..”

And most importantly, to hell with him, with Monsieur Gerard. After all this absurdity with Russification, after the adoption of the “anti-orphan” law, it’s just interesting to know what’s going on in the minds of those who sincerely support our government always and everywhere? How does all this fit into a single picture of the correct party policy? After all, it is absolutely clear that there are such people and there are by no means a small number of them - this is the same “nuclear” (I almost wrote “vigorous”) electorate, which Mr. Putin seems to have placed his bets on in the new year of 2013. One can argue for a long time how faithful these people will be to our alpha male if he runs out of money, but still... Still, these people exist.

Although there is a plus in all this: finally we will take a worthy place between Cyprus, with its offshores and tax haven, and Ecuador, where the almost dictator Correa is fighting the malicious Great Britain and stubborn Sweden for freedom of speech in the person of Mr. Assange. To be honest, how else do we differ from an ordinary raw material appendage?

Against the backdrop of all this, the joke about Putin the most influential, which famously managed to amuse the Internet and stir up “ourists” to promote the “PutinGod” trend on Twitter, looks especially funny. In this regard, I personally was reminded of the predictions that by 2020 the United States will produce more oil than anyone else. That is, by 2020, Putin will not only not be the “most influential” person in the world, but this very world will not need him at all. Because, apart from raw materials and 13% for Depardieu, Putin’s Russia does not produce anything, as a state and as an economy. But nothing has changed with the “production” of talented and often brilliant people, which, as our history shows, has nothing to do with the general plight.

Such things.