Iran met members of the IAEA by assurances in innocence: "Ayatollah prohibits nuclear weapons"

Magate representatives on Wednesday arrived in Iran, preceding the planned meeting “six” planned for the near future. On the eve of bilateral negotiations, nuclear experts, as usual, expressed restrained optimism regarding their results. However, according to unofficial data, it is not necessary to calculate that Tehran preaches the idea of ​​an exclusively peaceful atom.

“We hope to conclude an agreement on the admission of experts on objects that arouse suspicion, in particular, are interested in Parchin (a military complex, where, according to the IAEA, the development of nuclear weapons - approx. Newsru.com),” Reuters quoted the head of the delegation of the Magate Hermann Nakertsa. The expert made this statement at Vienna Airport on January 15 before departure to Tehran.

The Magate representative also noted that the attitude towards the trip with experts is constructive: "And we believe that Iran will lead them in the same way." The Iranian government answered in tone: the mood, of course, is a worker - but they did not forget to remind you of their right to atomic energy, reports Arab News .

We note, however, that the head of the IAEA Yukiya Amano last week admitted that he was considering the upcoming negotiations "not too optimistic." And there is something to think about. According to the last report of American experts, Iran will already have a margin of weapons uranium, sufficient to create an atomic bomb, Newsru Israel will have. Recall that due to such statements at the beginning of last year, Iran and the United States were on the verge of war . It was possible to avoid a direct conflict to this day, but the economic sanctions, which Washington strengthened everything, also turned out to be a difficult test for Iran.

A package of measures of economic impact on naughty Iranians, currently operating in less than a year, reduced the volume of sales of Iranian oil by 40%. And from February 6, the strengthening is coming: the sanctions developed at the American Treasury provide for the ban on international oil buyers to transfer to Iranian banks for goods. According to financiers, counterparties, concluding an oil transaction, transfer a fee to the banks of their country, and Iran will be able to receive funds only in the form of “permitted” goods: food, medicines, writes The Christian Science Monitor . If the buyer disgraces and transfer money to the Iranian bank for oil, then he risks becoming an outsider for the American financial system.

For the Iranian atom Fatva Ayatollah - the same instruction

Iran, in turn, cannot answer the United States with anything specific, because it continues to unfoundedly declare its innocence and even appeals to the highest feelings. So, the Iranian Foreign Ministry said that the West simply did not understand the ancient culture of the descendants of the Persians, otherwise there would be no doubt about the veracity of their statements. The fact is that the religious leader of the country Ali Khamenei prohibits the development of nuclear weapons strictly.

“In determining the boundaries of our nuclear activity, there is nothing more important than the fatwa leader’s fatwa,” Iran Ramin Mehmanparast, spokesman for the press secretary of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, quotes Press TV . According to him, the teaching of Ayatollah Khamenei, published in 2005, is in this case "job description."

“When the leader expresses his opinion, we simply must act in accordance with him,” the diplomat explained.

As far as these statements believed the opponents of Iran, it will probably become known soon - for February, the next meeting of the "six" is scheduled in Istanbul. The exact dates have not yet been determined, at present the Iranian side is waiting for a message from the Supreme Representative of the European Union on foreign policy and security Katherine Ashton about the place of negotiations, Iran News reports.

The previous meeting , we recall, took place in June in Moscow. Then the negotiation participants reported that the dialogue was constructive, however, the contradictions, as it turned out, did not disappear.