Translated material
Successful women of the mayor Chernyshev
The situation around the daughter of the current mayor Olga Chernysheva continues to hesitate. While Olga herself and lawyers get acquainted with the materials of the "case", good people continue to do the work that the investigation should do. So, at the disposal of the editorial office of the "Southern Federal" there were copies of interesting documents, according to which far -term conclusions can be drawn.
As many already know, Olga Mikhailovna in 2007 was actively engaged in land , for which several companies that ensured its activities were opened. However, there were or were not fraud with the ground - let it prove the investigation. In this text, we will talk about how not only to earn money on landowners, but also to keep the earned, deceiving the state for a round sum.
So, in 2007, the total income of Chernysheva Olga Mikhailovna, according to the tax return submitted to her, amounted to 250,842,460.27 rubles. And the amount of tax paid amounted to only 7,330,852 rubles, which is not even 3% of the amount earned. How did it happen?
The fact is that in the expenditure of her tax return, Olga Mikhailovna indicated that the amount of her expenses amounted to as much as 193 194,472.45 rubles. Where could this amount go? Well, for example, on September 20, 2007, IP "Olga Mikhailovna Chernysheva" entered into an agreement for the provision of services with the IP "Chernysheva Tatyana Vasilievna", for the amount of 21,300,000, which, of course, entered the very consumption part.
According to the concluded agreement, IP "Chernysheva Tatyana Vasilievna" was supposed to perform the following services: to collect data on the real estate market in the areas of interest to the customer; collect documents for objects that interest the customer; documented the customer's transactions; Represent the interests of the customer when searching and negotiations with potential buyers.
Based on the act of acceptance and transfer of work under the above agreement, IP "Chernysheva T.V." For the amount of more than 20,000,000 rubles, she made the following: provided data on the owners of three plots who are interested in the customer; checked the title documents; compiled a plan of the plots; held a consultation on the preparation of a package of documents; Provided consulting services.
There are about a dozen such agreements and acts of acceptance of work performed work. It is not difficult to guess that the executors of "orders" are "close" people of Mrs. Chernysheva. The amount of each contract is at least 20,000,000 rubles. Hence the large expenditure part in the tax return of Olga Mikhailovna for 2007.
“Rostov-on-Don consulters literally beat in hysterics. Many well-known consulting companies of the city would be happy to conclude contracts for such amounts. They never dreamed of such contracts,” commented the situation by Elena Romanova, editor-in-chief of the Southern Federal Media Portal.
The official forensic examination conducted by the federal budgetary institution "The Southern Regional Center for Forensic Expertise" answered the question of tax payments as follows: "The question of determining mandatory tax payments is not within the competence of legal experts, but refers to the prerogative of tax authorities."
And the senior investigator of the second department for the investigation of particularly important cases (about crimes against state authorities and in the field of economics) of the Investigative Department of the IC of the Russian Federation for the RO Major of Justice A. Tolmachev, in the actions of Mrs. Chernysheva, did not see the crime. What he did not fail to inform the applicants in the decision to refuse to institute criminal proceedings.
The fact that Olga Mikhailovna, in fact, distributed more than a hundred millions to friends and relatives for the provision of ephemeral services, and then brought them to the consumption part - apparently, is not a crime. Where the tax inspectorate looks is unknown.
Actually, only two questions remain. Why, as part of the investigation, does not conduct a tax audit and how does Olga Mikhailovna differ from a simple resident of Rostov-on-Don?
And mostly a wonderful marquise, everything is fine! Everything is fine!