Wrestlers with Irys

Valeria Ilyinichna Novodvorskaya continues its war. Her war is that civil. The war is white and red. She heroically beats on a skew behind the whites, dreaming of throwing the Reds into the sea. She needs one victory and nothing else. And she is not embarrassed that the fair part of the then whites of her herself would hang her on the same bitch with the Bolsheviks - which she knows about. Most of those whom she included in the list of her today's enemies (and even considered interest), then they would be for the whites. In its friends and allies, Novodvorskaya is ready to record 5-10% of the population. In this regard, its fans should carefully weigh the chances of implementing a "European project" in Russia, following its attitudes.

Novodvorskaya continues to live in that civil war, not noticing that the front lines have long and many times have changed. Yes, that civil war is not formally completed, but the desire to continue it until a complete and final victory does not have most of the heirs of both the then white and then red. The country instinctively seeks ways to reconcile white and red, and various socio-political trends put forward their options for such reconciliation. And the content of the ideological and political struggle of recent years is largely the competition of these projects.

In 2012, two large "white-red" alliance came together in the frontal clash. According to ideological colors, the “Poklonnaya Coalition” hastily knocked out by the Kremlin as in a crooked mirror reflected the “swamp-Sakharovskaya” opposing it. The triumvirate symbolizing it has its own communist (Stalin-Impersky)-Sergey Kurginyan, his own bourgeois liberal (the right-libshel ​​conservative of the Pinochetovsky, A la Latinin)-Mikhail Leontyev, his own nationalist (traditionalist) is Maxim Shevchenko. And the point is not that the participants of one coalition are "real", and the other - "imitation". Unlike a cardboard batch of crooks and thieves, existing at the expense of an administrative resource and passive mass, always dutifully voting for any authorities, the listed characters are quite “living”. Each of them has a large number of fairly active hot fans.

Russia is a field of confrontation between two civilizations: European and " neovizanti ". Each of them has its own plebeian and aristocratic parties, its left and right, red and white. And each is looking for its own version, its own model of historical reconciliation, the termination of the "that" civil war.

Alexander Prokhanov has long and passionately preach his own project for overcoming the "metaphysical rupture" of red and white Russia on a neovizantial civilizational basis. Red Russia for him is primarily Stalinist, white - pre -revolutionary, traditional, Orthodox -monarchist. They are related by the primacy of the Russian people, the leadership of the supra -enlarged values, the idea of ​​Russia as an empire. By connecting, they must give mortal battle to Western liberalism. And although Prokhanov calls himself left and red, his project is much closer to the ideals of the extreme right of historical white.

It is in the Prokhanov direction that the recently created Izborsk club, claiming the role of the intellectual center of conservative Russia, leads its research. In addition to Prokhanov himself, he included the left Sergey Chernyakhovsky, Sergey Glazyev, Mikhail Delyagin. And by no means “as if”, but very right -wing Mikhail Leontyev, Maxim Shevchenko, Alexander Dugin. Under the unifying canopy of the Minister of Medinsky.

The Stanovaya Range of the Izborsky Club is an alliance of post -postalists with Orthodox fundamentalists, with frank clerical obscurantists. Izborsk White - the heirs of the same part of the historical whites who would hang Novodvorskaya on the same bitch with Lenin and Trotsky - for their general Western orientation.

Their red allies are also very specific. Classical Marxism (by the way, by the natural development of the born European civilization of the humanistic and rationalist philosophy of progress) considers the essence of capitalism a system of wage labor, from which the owner of the means of production extracts surplus value. It is in this that Marx sees the basic mechanism of the unfair redistribution of resources under capitalism. In the 20th century, another anti -capitalist concept, which sees the determining line of capitalism (and, accordingly, the main mechanism of unfair redistribution) in the loan percentage, has become widespread. The adherents of this concept even reproached Marx that his theory obscures the paramount importance of loan capital under capitalism. Apparently, Marx does this intentionally, by virtue of his ... Well, you yourself know what.

In the 20th century, such anti -capitalism repeatedly adopted political movements, to put it mildly, far from red. He meets complete understanding and sympathy among the Izborsk Whites. Here, for example, the reasoning of the rector of the Urals of the Ural Business Institute named after Ivan Ilyin, Archpriest Alexandra Chanyilo: “Finances, usury, percentage - the greatest sin. Banks should take only for services ... We must change economic practice. We are working on the creation of a higher economy, non -capitalist spiritual and moral economy.”

As for the Izborsk Reds, they have long been focused on the exposure of the global banking oligarchy, but they somehow forgot about the operation of hired labor. And this is unlikely by accident. The implementation of the mobilization project, the need for which Prokhanov repeats so long, would require a sharp increase in the share of the surplus product concentrated in the hands of those who will assign the right to act on behalf of the whole society.

The implementation of this project and strict ideological unification will require - on the basis of the same neovizant doctrine of the transformation of Moscow into another Rome. For the sake of this, neovizantists will rally society against the external and internal enemy, escalating medieval clerical obscurantism. For the sake of this chimera of sovereign greatness, and by no means for the good of a simple person the totalitarian sect of the loans of a loan interest seeks to curb private interests and replace competition with another collegiality.

Almost all the Irys belong to the "bow" camp, which is the coalition of the "Russian Byzantines." He is opposed by "Russian Europeans." And the classic red objects are objectively in this confrontation with the allies of the heirs of the Western, "bourgeois-democratic" part of the historical white. Classic red are "red Europeans".

As we have seen, the neovizantic coalition is actually not painted in red tones - rather in purple and black. But the “Russian Europeans” can give a red color to the “Russian Europeans” - if in their coalition it plays the role not decorative. "Russian Europeans" need their own anti -oligarchic program. It can be based on the idea of ​​a compensation tax or on the idea of ​​a new land decree (socialization of natural resources). It can also be based on the idea of ​​monitoring labor collectives over management (1917 working control reincarnation). These are already details that will depend on the political will of the forces participating in the joint development of such a program. The main thing is that it is focused on the interests of man, not a little little state. In accordance with the basic values ​​of European civilization.