From the fact that the rebellion was planned mentally ill, the rebellion did not stop being like that

The investigation of the absurdity

Colonel Kvachkov received 13 years for preparing an armed rebellion. Frankly, I would not see in this sentence a reason for reflection if there were not many articles of liberal opponents of the regime, the essence of which was that the bloody regime planted a madman, once again showing his bestial entity.

Have mercy, Kvachkova was not imprisoned for the fact that he believes that the Power in Russia was seized by the Jews; It is not for what he called Putin the “Helmint Gelmintovich”, and not for the fact that, according to Kvachkov, the Jewish nation (“GMO-Ludi”, according to the terminology of the colonel), was born because “Satan was carried out by a special project for the bloodstream of sister Sarah from brother Abraham.”

Kvachkov was presented with very specific things: that he, meeting with his associates in Moscow, St. Petersburg, Vladivostok, Yekaterinburg and Samara, formed military detachments from them.

That in early August 2010, a thousand of these supporters, divided into groups “Center”, “West”, “South”, “Vostok” and “North”, should have gathered under the guise of tourists in the forest near the training military center No. 467 under the carpet, blow up the towers of cellular communications, suppress the center, and get the “tool” and “lawn mushrooms” (i.e. Bronzetchika) and Go on a trip to the capital.

Moreover, a year after the arrest of Kvachkov, another group of his supporters, which was headed by Colonel Khabarov (Schizophrenic Ermakov served between them), planned to raise the rebellion in Yekaterinburg. The plan was called "Dawn." All parts of the plan-from “R-1” to “R-6”-were carefully painted. Part “P-1” began with sabotage (in particular, de-energizing all of Yekaterinburg). Further, under the section "P-2", liquidation was underway. In notebooks, thorough student handwriting, “shot lists” were compiled, which included: Ashkenazi Zelig Azriel (chief rabbi of Yekaterinburg), Okhstrakh Mikhail Iosifovich (president of the Jewish national-cultural autonomy), Khatskelevich Lia Vladimirovna, Berzengft Mikhail Leonidovich (Zamim Okhstraha), Valiev Niyaz Gadimovich (head of the mining university), etc., equipped, respectively, Jews - the star of David, Muslims - a crescent.

If our beautiful -minded liberals believe that all this is a lie, that Kvachkov was not going to capture any part under the carpet, and Khabarova painted the bloody Goebnya “shot lists”, then it should be written: to dispute the accusations brought by the investigation.

Instead, the prosecution is not even discussed, but exclaimed: how can you treat political opponents like that?

Gentlemen, this is not politics, this is a rebellion. Rebells often think crazy. In 1812, General Male, escaping from a madhouse, tried to seize power in Paris. What, because he was crazy, was it not a revolution?

In 1310, the Venetian Kvachkov, a certain Bahamont Tiepolo, also planned a coup and even gave a cloud with his supporters to the main square, where a certain old lady leaning out of the window dropped a mortar on the head of his banner. Of course, the Venetians could have laughed, but the times were non -IBRIAL: they fiercely cleaned the conspirators and established the advice of ten.

Imagine that the conspiracy against Peter III would end in failure: how would we laugh at a stupid German who tried to master the Russian throne with the help of a lover guards!

Idiocy is not an apology. It facilitates the prevention of rebellion, but does not soften the verdict. Sometimes it seems to me that our liberal public has lost the most fundamental concepts about what the duties of the state are. And this applies not only to Kvachkov’s case - this applies, for example, the cases of the murder of Budanov.

I will not now about Budanov himself (my personal opinion is a signs and well-deserved revenge of the killer and the rapist), but the essence is that revenge (no matter what a hired killer or disinterested avenger) is the 105th article of the Criminal Code.

The essence of the matter is that the killers could not burn the car - the white Mitsubishi Lancer, and, as I understand it, this car managed to go to Yusup Temerhanov, religious and criminal authority from the "Lazan" group. That in a non -combatant car on the scanvorda found a mark of the palm of Temerhanov, and in the same gloves abandoned there - traces of his DNA. And that when it came to the jury, the usual story began, which happens when the Chechens judged the jury: the jury began to scatter, and Temerhanov’s lawyer seemed to be caught by the giving money to witnesses.

And let's take the devil, discuss this: where did the DNA and prints Temerhanov come from in the car. But no! This is not even discussed, and a lawyer who has fallen into a dubious story is extolled as a fighter for truth. For a certain part of the public, any person put on a bench of the defendants with a “bloody regime” is obviously innocent; The evidence is even indecent, and it is only decent to retell what the lawyer says, no matter how brazenly he lies.

It is worth telling one more truth: our consequence was so disqualified, so much ceased to catch mice that even in the most obvious cases when, having made the slightest effort, it can be crushed in the eyes of the public of crazy rebels and unscrupulous lawyers, it does not put these efforts. The guys are too busy with money and Navalny.