Mr. Investigator: "Outraged the agility of your supporters"

Why were I interrogated in the UK in the case of Leonid Razvozhaev
Today I was questioned in the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation as a witness in one of the criminal cases against Leonid Razvozzhaev. Among other things, Razvozhaev is accused of “false denunciation” for identifying the participant of his abduction in the investigator Dmitry Pleshivtsev. In the UK, for some reason, they decided that I could be a witness on this matter.

The interrogation was conducted by the investigator in particularly important cases Anton Nikitin. Here he is:

I must say that his questions went far beyond the scope of the criminal case and more resembled a political discussion.

Basically, the investigator was interested in what the coordination council of the opposition was and how he works. I showed a video with the episodes of one of the COP meetings and the statements of its participants. Nikitin asked to comment on my speeches demanding to introduce a number of investigators who are engaged in swamp business to the “Magnitsky” list.

What all this is related to the case of Razvozhaev, one can only guess. By the way, with the Razvozzhaev himself, the investigator, according to him, saw in January - in the Irkutsk pre -trial detention center. He says that he “holds on to a cheerful” and even read the verses of his own compositions written behind bars during the interrogation.

Another investigator was not indignant for the protocol by the “agility of some supporters of the opposition”, who “almost every day” update the information on the website http://bolotnoedelo.info is outrage, in my opinion, the best praise to “some of our supporters”.

The investigator demanded a non -disclosure subscription from me, but I refused to give it, since I consider this requirement illegal. Why should we be silent in the framework of criminal cases that are fabricated for political reasons? And the political motivation of the UK, in my opinion, is quite obvious. How else to regard the actions of investigators if they spend the hours of their work on studying who and what said at a meeting of the CS of the opposition? There is nothing more to do? All bandits have already been caught, apparently.

Today's interrogation has left no doubt that the “Magnitsky List” for a Russian political investigation is an extremely painful topic. And the purpose of my call for interrogation is banal pressure. To “rant” less on this subject.

However, my position is unchanged: all investigators and judges, as well as the leaders of law enforcement agencies involved in the political persecution of the Russian opposition, must be subjected to personal sanctions, including visa restrictions and blocking their foreign assets.

And I intend to defend this point of view in all legal ways.