Deputy Isaev and MK - the language will bring to the prosecutor's office

Update: 03/17/2013

The State Duma Commission on Deputy Ethics will evaluate the words of Andrei Isaev to journalists. As a member of the commission, Socialist -Revolutionaries Mikhail Bryachan, told Ekhu Moscow, the decision was made after numerous media publications in this regard. The incident will be considered at a meeting on Wednesday.

State Duma deputy Andrei Isaev decided to “hardly deal with the Moscow Komsomolets newspaper because of the publication, which, in his opinion, is offensive to his party colleagues. It all started with a record in the Twitter microblog, which appeared on the morning of March 15: "In a yellow newspaper, a vile, vile, dirty hitting on 3 women-deputies. The bastards who did this should know: we will definitely not forget, we won’t forgive!" What kind of "yellow newspaper" are we talking about, the deputy did not want to talk.

As it turned out, Isaev was angry with George Jansa's column “Political prostitution changed gender” , in which the author analyzes the political biography and the latest legislative initiatives of three female deputies from the United Russia party- Irina Yarova , Ekaterina Lakhova and Olga Batalina . Deputies are united not only by the fact that they are now in the United Russia party, but also a frequent change in parties or political views. For example, Olga Batalina first advocated the signing of an adoption agreement with the United States, and then - for the ban on the Americans to adopt orphans from Russia, and Irina Yarovaya went from the Yabloko party to United Russia.

The article was so angry with the deputy that he decided not to stop on one post on Twitter. In the evening of the same day, he wrote again: "Small creatures - relax, you are indifferent to us. But the specific editor and the author will answer hard." The journalist Oleg Kashin responded to the "scream of the soul" of the deputy with the question: "Arming?" Kashin hinted at the attack, which was completely at him in November 2010: then the opposition journalist was harshly beaten with armature, and the attackers were not found.

The sharp statements of the deputy caused a violent indignant reaction among his subscribers on the social network. One of Twitter users wrote : “Small creatures are your voters. At least pretend that you are a deputy ((” other users are offended, in particular, one of them asked the deputy: “Mr. Isaev, why do you call and insult your voters? They are Russian citizens and elected you a deputy, and you? ..”

Photo: Avmalgin

The editors of the newspaper "Moscow Komsomolets" responded to the tweet of United Russia. The Deputy Chief editor of the newspaper Auder Mudsabaev explained the situation on his Facebook and Twitter page. It was he who edited the very material that caused Isaev’s so violent reaction. Among other things, Muzhdabaev noted: “I am not afraid of Isaev and his accomplices in the party, and I even respect him somewhere. This politician, unlike many, has not lost his human appearance. He has alive, natural reactions. I confess that I sometimes look like a Friday evening, but I don’t broadcast my consciousness on Twitter.”

On Saturday morning, March 16, the reaction of the editor -in -chief of the publication Pavel Gusev, who said that MK would file an application with Isaev’s threats: “observed by one of the leaders of United Russia, hysteria and agony, testifies to the imminent death of this party. But I, as a hunter with experience, have repeatedly observed that the wounded animal is very dangerous. Therefore, I, as the chairman The Union of Journalists of Moscow and the head of the Commission of the Public Chamber of Russia to protect freedom of speech, on Monday I submit documents to the General Prosecutor's Office and a number of other instances that will help protect the journalists of our newspaper. "

The deputy Andrei Isaev also struck a return blow, who stated that he would invite the party bodies to respond to publications in the media. “I will ask the party bodies to officially make a decision on this story,” Isaev shared with Interfax. In addition, in an interview with Gazeta.ru, Isaev said that he was not afraid of calling to the prosecutor’s office at all, and also explained why, in his opinion, Pavel Gusev published a column: “I have a version, in connection with which Pavel Gusev organized these rude unprecedented attacks on Irina Yarovaya and Olga Balan. People discussed the possibility of prohibiting the publication of the advertising of intimate services in the media.

Photo: Avmalgin

Journalists of other publications also decided to clarify their position on this issue. The Rain TV channel made an appeal to the chairman of the State Duma Sergey Naryshkin. “We ask you to consider the statement of the deputy Andrei Isaev at the ethics commission and give him an assessment,” the appeal says that can be signed under the appropriate post on Facebook.

Publicpost tried to talk with the deputy Isaev, but his assistant Alexander Ridlazov said the following: "I immediately warn you that we are not cooperating with Publicpost. Further without comment." In turn, the editor of MK Auder Mudsabaev talked about why exactly Isaev so painfully reacted to the article "MK".

Auder Mudsabaev, Deputy Chief Editor of the Moscow Komsomolets:

"In my opinion, the bureau of the party needs to endure Isaev’s behavior, which is disgraced by the party. He carries it. I believe that this is a Friday evening syndrome, but still a person should be responsible for his words, he is the deputy chairman of the largest ruling party of Russia. Such words cannot be used in public discussion, I really say that he is simply illiterate. There are no insults in this article. It is completely clean there, it is completely clean. It is exclusively about political prostitution - that is, about the change of political preferences and political judgments by the heroines.

- In your opinion, why exactly Isaev reacted so violently to the article? His one -party people are silent so far.

Firstly, Isaev has a very shaky position now. Real estate in Germany, investigation of Navalny against him. He needs to be a particularly aggressive dog now. He barks louder than others and tries to prove his need for the owner. Secondly, each person, as you know, is most offended by his mirror. As for the term "political prostitution", of course, he was not offended by the women-deputies, especially since I emphasize that there was nothing offensive to them, it was a political Leninist terminology. He saw himself exclusively in this, because he himself was an anarchist, a communist, and now he is one of the leaders of United Russia. Such mimicry is not in vain. This is called political prostitution. And so he, seeing himself in this headline and in the content of the article, of course, became furious because he realized that it was about him too.

- It turns out that he is not a shame for women, but for himself?

Of course, for yourself. He saw himself. He is a political prostitute himself. Because a person who first is a Marxist, then a social democrat, then an anarchist, a trade union figure, and then goes into a party who is absolutely capitalist and many of its leaders are representatives of large capital, it is obvious that this person radically changed his judgments in his life. This is called political prostitution. "