
“It’s not scary that you will die,” Valentin Gaft somehow joked, “and Bezrukov will play after death.” Yes, horror! But not a horror-Uzhasus! But it’s really scary if you die and get into hell. And not in the textbook underworld, where boilers and devils are boiling to them, thrush so that it is hotter. And in hell, the television, where the Soloviev Ball with Mamontov rule is the main champions of morality on our TV and the highly moraine gentlemen, adherents of genuinely Christian values.
Mamontov, I remember, branded by the shame of the blasphemy from the punk group of Pussy Riot, shared his innermost: how he was in the distant years of Komsomol youth, risking the career of the Soviet propagandist journalist, secretly performed the procession around the Moscow basin, gaping in the place of the Cathedral of Christ the Savior demolished by the Bolsheviks, and the bells were eccentric. The ringing, which-the time has come-has spread over our sinful land!
And this pious Christian in the days of Great Lent, despising all the commandments of the Lord, arranged in the studio the Great Sabbath on the occasion of the death of the great and terrible Boris Berezovsky. The dead, as you know, do not have a shame. Some living things too. And they, as it turned out, they are afraid much less than that, though that had already gone into a different world, but still leading to them the sacred thrill of the “main villain” of our latest history. Probably, because with such gloating, they began to kick the “good people” that were still the still body in the studio of the “Special correspondent” program.
The characters who, according to the host, “knew the deceased” were salted: bodyguards (no matter how blasphemous this word sounds in the context of what was happening in the studio). Popying the gaffe, it’s not scary that you will die, but the fact that after death the role of your personality in history will be evaluated by the guards. “What other personality? - contemptuously clicked one. “An ordinary thimble.” “I have been with him for ten years and disagree that this is a person in history,” he shared his other considerations. - A fairly average person - moderately creative, moderately daring, to the best of life, who had two passions: a cheerful life (cognac and cocaine) and young girls. " “I am not inclined to study Borya Berezovsky as a person - I am inclined to study it as a phenomenon,” the third, famous after one sad tea ceremony, ranted. - I will allow myself not to talk about the role of personality in history, but about the role of a criminal person in history ”(so !!!).
Professor of the Higher School of Economics Leonid Polyakov, although in the protection of Berezovsky he did not serve and hardly knew him “good and long”, performed no worse than intellectual guards. “Since,” he says, “such a booze went, you can add another plot - his love for ladies younger than twenty has already been mentioned here ...” “Fifteen,” Mamontov specified. “Well, we will not attribute to him the pedophilia,” the professor showed generosity, remembering the film “Empire of Passion” very much to the place, where “a lady, obsessed with love for a partner, strangled him in order to obtain a constant erection.”
The Orthodox God -fearing mammoths did not lead. But on the screen, at his request, they brought a photo of Berezovsky exactly with a scarf around his neck. "Not the one that was found on the floor in the bathroom next to the lifeless body?" - the host expressed the guess. And then a correspondent Andrei Kondrashov from London appeared on the screen, who continued the theme of a murderous scarf. Referring to the informed source, he told the public that the scarf is a traditional murder weapon of Russian and British intelligence services (the instructions for use were delayed busily). But this is only one of the versions. According to another, there could be either thieves in law or the heirs of his former partner Badri Patarkatsishvili to kill Berezovsky. "Do you have freedom to cover the investigation, do not British prevent you?" - asked a colleague of mammoths. “It’s extremely difficult to work,” he complained. “The house is cordoned off, everything is strictly secret.” "Yes, here it is, British freedom of speech!" - the host sarcastically summed up, and other participants in the program vividly picked up the topic: uniform disgrace, even photographs of the corpse have not yet been shown!
During the program, the deceased easily “sewed” the murder of Listyev, Yushenkov and Litvinenko, explosions of houses in Moscow and an attempt to attack in Ukraine, the creation and financing of the opposition, the opposition media and the Triumph Awards designed to overthrow Putin.
Lawyer Semyon Aria, who was horrified by what was happening in the studio, managed to break through the microphone in the final for a minute and express sympathy and condolences to the relatives of the deceased, at the same time trying to refute wild accusations that sounded from the lips of other participants in the program. But Mamontov quickly shut him up, expressing his own condolences ... "People who suffered from Berezovsky’s actions."
This show was bored and ended, or ... the holiday, as one of its participants described the discussion: they say, Berezovsky made a holiday out of everything and once again gave it to us and TV ...
The "holiday" was really successful for fame - who just did not crawl into the light of God, in order to get even with the deceased on these "high -heart days"! In Sunday evening, Solovyov was additionally hanged by Nord-Ost, cooperation with the KGB, the trading of the lives of our soldiers in Chechnya, and also called a downed pilot, a small, puny bald man, a sucker who did not understand people, a traitor, a petty demon and an “crossroads”, which was visible to finally convince Spectators in his vile and unprincipled essence.
And only in the premiere release of the Parthenov program on the Rain television channel, the deceased was really given to the deceased. People who really “well and long” knew Berezovsky spoke about the scale of his personality, inconsistency of actions, personal drama ... And Gleb Pavlovsky with some sadness stated: “He was so convenient as an enemy that it was simply incomprehensible today, who would replace him.” Here they showed a fragment of the farewell performance of Boris Berezovsky in the State Duma, where he remembered the old joke: “How does the Englishman differ from a Jew? The Englishman leaves, without saying goodbye, and the Jew says goodbye and does not leave. ”
But really - did not leave. And he forced himself to talk and argue. And at the same time, to compare the heroes of yesterday with the heroes of our time, the present and century past. In general, the cat from home is mice to dance. They, the Gray, have a holiday, as was said.