Chechen lands - apple of discord

After the change of leadership in Ingushetia in October 2008, the population of the republic still fought hope for improving the socio -political situation. His predecessor, M. Zyazikov (2002 - 2008), I remember, was wary of the following 2 reasons: 1. He is a former Chekist, and there are no former ones, as they say; 2. He replaced the popularly beloved and worthy son of Ingushetia R. Aushev. It is no secret that R. Aushev did not forgive his property not to bend under any Moscow decision. What is Yunus-Bek Evkurov?

In general, Yunus Bek Bamatgireevich continued the established tradition of local authorities: everyone is directly related to military service, respectively, they were always entitled to both Moscow and the ordinary population certain hopes. The aspirations of Moscow and the people were one in one- so that everything was calm. Cardinal difference - in the methods. Framed, last by 20 years by political experiments, the Ingush people acquired a stable apathy. The change of Zyazikov to another security official Evkurov, in fact, turned out to be a change of scenery. Populistic steps like the fact that Yevkurov gives some numbers where the disappointed militants can call, does not withstand criticism. He, as a military man, does not know that armed people on the other side are not a gang of ordinary criminals. Some have an idea in their heads. Otherwise, they would not be ready not only to kill, but also to be killed.

In economically, Ingushetia failed to get out of outsiders: budget financing by 90%, you must agree, a sign that the authorities cannot solve the economic problem of the region : “Statistics confirming that this area of ​​work of the managerial structures of the region has already very specific results is reflected in the text of the annual message of the head of Ingushetia to the People’s Assembly, voiced Yunus-Buck Evkurov last Thursday. It was said, in particular, that with an indicator 94 % of subsidies by the end of 2012 of Ingushetia, this figure was reduced to 84. ”

A 10 %decrease is also a result, but where the money goes is not an idle question. Accordingly, both on the political and economic path, the current leadership of Ingushetia actually did not show its decisive qualities. The undertakings under R. Aushev remained a good "memorandum of intentions." What, the current leadership of Ingushetia decided, or at least tried to resolve the issue in the suburban area? No, it is obvious that he was not appointed for this. Where is the exit for Yevkurov? Having found nothing more valuable to raise his face among compatriots, he plays the “Chechen map”. The makings of a military intelligence officer make themselves felt. But whether this operation will be so successful as Primetinskaya is a question.

Moscow is silent. Created since 1992. The commission on the administrative border between Chechnya and Ingushetia, was well -packed, never come to a specific legal condition. Ingushetia provided her help in such an inconspicuous business. Constant delaying the solution of this issue and backstage negotiations contributed to this. The notorious Yeltsin decree on the creation of the Ingush Republic of June 4, 1992 laid the foundation for the fraternal people. This reminds me of the case with attempts to separate the land of Baden-Württemberg from the main part of Germany, notes of which are heard for the past 5 years. They all started with protests, saying why they feed the rest of the lands. They have this problem, in the Caucasus - different. They have so many dialectic differences that it would be possible to divide the Germany itself into individual nations for a long time. Knowledgeable German language will not let me lie if I say that, for example, in the same Baden-Württemberg they make their translation, different from the classic German. Let me not be suspected in Panchensky moods: they were separated, well, Glory to Allah! Moreover, in that decree the mechanism of resolving the issue on the border was not mentioned. Moscow was not just herself, she did not give a damn.

The extravagant theory of “expanding living space” was hung on Chechnya as one of the new accusations against her. Let's figure it out, dear! Provide historical and legal documents. What does the leadership of Ingushetia relies on when it declares the "origin" of the Ingush lands (completely Sunzhensky and Malgobek districts)? I will not go into historical details where you can often find the mention of modern Ingush as representatives of Chechen teips. What does the latest story tell us? In 1993, in the oral coordination of the parties, work began on the border. The then heads of the regions, R. Aushev and D. Dudaev created the “state commissions of the parties to revise the border between the Chechen Republic-Ichkeria and the Republic of Ingushetia”, taking the border of 1934 as the basis of negotiations. This is the commission to revise the border between Chechnya and Ingushetia. On July 23, 1993, the agreement is signed by D. Dudaev and R. Aushev.

That is, as can be seen from the text to the jurisdiction of Chechnya, the following settlements should have passed: from the Sunzhensky district -Sernovodskaya, Assinovskaya, Chemulga, arshty, Karabulak, Troitskaya, Nesterovskaya, Ordzhonikidzevskaya; From the Malgobek district - Voznesenovskaya, Akki -Yurt and New Redant. The process begun in the legal field was interrupted by well -known events. On March 23, 2003, a referendum on the status of the republic was held in Chechnya. The subsequent election of the president and the Chechnya parliament forced to raise this issue. If the Chechen side demanded a return to the implementation of the above agreement, then the Ingush side, appealing to the center, demanded the unconditional legal consolidation of these areas as part of Ingushetia. This is nothing but the requirement to legitimize the raider seizure. Yes, there are many in Russia that this has successfully passed, but you should not deceive some of these Ingush figures. Adopted on October 6, 2003, Federal Law No. 131 “On the General Principles of the Organization of Local Self -Government in the Russian Federation” already from the federal side gave the subjects about the need to determine the border. But, here, the leadership of Ingushetia found a reason to ignore his neighbor.

Talk about the fact that the Naursky district was transferred to Chechnya in return for the suburban district - from the field of fantasies of Chechenfobs. The one who claims this, let him show the document. At the moment, in addition to accusations and fiery statements, the type of P. Korchagin against Chechnya, in fact, does not have anything constructive. The leadership of Ingushetia feels that it comes to an end to their backstage games, and the time has come as brothers, nevertheless, to solve the border issue. One of the characteristic moments of this can be regarded that Ingushetia filed a lawsuit against the Constitutional Court of the decision of the Chechen parliament in the Sunzhensky district. Characterizing as counterproductive, we can regard the fact that the Va-Bank went to the Chechen side, the leadership of Ingushetia. At the same time, assurances in friendship and fraternity look in their performance as extremely hypocritical.

Adopted by the Chechen parliament on November 6, 2012, the Law on the Sunzhensky district gave the basis for the legal execution of the previously approved agreement. This law created a commotion in the leadership of Ingushetia. Yu. Evkurov: “The laws adopted by the parliament of another constituent entity of the Russian Federation have no legal consequences for Ingushetia. In all areas, cities and villages of the republic, local self -government bodies operate on legally, and the jurisdiction of the subject is fully applied to them . ” The speaker of the Ingushetia parliament M. Didigov: “It is regrettable that my colleagues encroached not only on the fixed rights and norms of the Constitution of the Chechen Republic, but also try to violate the fundamentals of the state structure of the Republic of Ingushetia, enshrined in the basic law of the republic and the Constitution of the Russian Federation. This step is forced to response to protect our land and their sovereignty. ” To capture other people's lands and call them to match the cowboys of the Wild West! Holding the town nationalist movements, the leadership of Ingushetia itself brings the situation to a critical one. Whether this will give a brilliance to the face of the leadership - I doubt it. Further, the Ingush speaker adds a very funny: “Deputies of the People’s Assembly of the Republic of Ingushetia, using the right given by the people, will accept legislative acts aimed at protecting the rights of its citizens and territorial integrity in accordance with federal law in full”: http://magas.bezformata.ru/listnews/ingushetiya-protivorechat-konstitutcii/10275713/ . Mukharbek Ilyasovich in this case should explain on the basis of which federal laws the so -called "protection of citizens' rights and territorial integrity will be carried out. What, Chechnya is treacherously capturing the lands? Declared war to someone? Mukharbek Ilyasovich, take off the helmet, just once, fraternally, sit down at the table, and begin to solve the issue, and not garbage the consciousness of ordinary Ingush and Chechen citizens!

One of the features of our time is that various kinds of people gained access, the opportunity to express their opinion. The North Caucasus Blogosphere is sometimes full of frank mud on Chechnya, the Chechen people from some, chronically preoccupied with the quasi of their own people. At the same time, often giving out the product of their own attitude for the opinion of the whole people. This is somewhat related to the Nazis who raised their heads in Russia. It is great to have an opinion, but when instead of arguments, they write fiction or frank dirt, it becomes a shame that you have a genealogical kinship with similar elements: somehow they call themselves Ingush. I never accused, and I will not blame the fraternal Ingush people. And among the brothers there are quarrels. The main thing is not to bring everything to insanity. As I previously wrote, for me nationalism is unacceptable for Islamic reasons. And everyone who cultivates it, albeit at the state or ordinary household level, let him do what the Prophet Muhammad, S.A.S., in his famous hadith, advised by such.