Kudrin and sources

Message : " The former head of the Ministry of Finance Alexei Kudrin is considered in the presidential administration (AP) as a probable curator of the Kremlin economic bloc, the sources of Izvestia, familiar with the situation, confirmed . Most likely, this is true - well, with reservations.

Firstly, “can become”, and secondly, “considered”, thirdly the Izvestia themselves and its unexpected sources. In general, there is a ranking among sources? "High -ranking", for example. And here-just "acquaintances with the situation." Not even "informed." In addition, not one (which would be more solid), but in the plural - that in total it already resembles a chicken (if they still remained in the AP).

Further, it is also shaky: " Kudrin can receive the post of deputy head of the AP and in this case will actually become the head of the economic bloc of the shadow government and a potential candidate for the premier post ."

Here, too, "first" and in "second". Well, if the head of the economic bloc (GEB), then, presumably, in fact, not an adviser, but with a position. Secondly-what is the lyrics in the form of a "shadow government"? What does it mean that the opposition wave is exposed in the Kremlin against the current executive branch, systemic? Thirdly, why if the GEB, then certainly a potential prime minister? No, not even like that: “Potential candidate”-in the circle of tenders-tender there ...

Actually, this topic was spinning earlier, the main thing in the publication of the news “that Kudrin has already restored the connection:“ According to Izvestia, preparing for the probably appointment, Kudrin has already held a number of meetings with his former colleagues, talking with them about possible collaboration . ”

Of course, the turnover “preparing for the probable purpose” is very similar to the phrase “probable enemy”, which they waited in the USSR, but did not wait. But, for example, it is reported that " in particular, on April 20, the ex-Minister of Finance held an informal meeting with the former head of Rosfinnadzor Sergey Pavlenko, who in 2000-2004 performed the duties of the head of the Secretariat Kudrin, when he was Minister of Finance. The source of" Izvestia "from the environment of Kudrin told the publication that the probable appointment of the ex-minister was discussed ." That is, the fact of action is evident.

When should clarity come? According to the proposed version, " Kudrin is invited as an independent expert to a meeting with the participation of the President and representatives of the financial and economic bloc of the Kremlin and the Government ." And it will be held on April 22 in Sochi - i.e. Today.

RBC in this regard gave his insider . Their last topic looks definitely: " The corresponding decision can be made in the coming days following a trilateral meeting to stimulate economic growth, which will be held in Sochi. The president’s press service did not confirm this information ."

In fact , “ Presidential press secretary Dmitry Peskov confirmed that a meeting with the participation of the economic bloc of the government, the presidential administration and the expert community will be held on Monday in Sochi. He does not know about Putin’s meeting with Kudrin, as well as about his possible appointment to the presidential administration .” At the same time, Kudrin’s participation in the meeting is considered more or less proven.

Inasides - insidies, and context is more reliable

Yes, in total there is something interesting. Already the function in itself: such as the GEB (head of the economic bloc) in AP covers all the activities of the government. Well, this is not so the news, but the point is in the character. This is not about how Kudrin resigned and, accordingly, how to now build relations with D. Medvedev. It was a long time ago and, in general, here is Moscow - they are not offended here. The point is not even the possible replacement of Medvedev Kudrin - well, their business. It’s just that Kudrina knows the last name a large percentage of the population, which means that the place of Gaba receives additional weight.

Also in the context there is a theme of Kudrin and Sakharov Avenue (who, besides him, was from category officials and was there?). And not even by itself, but because Kudrin also has a KGI (committee of civilian initiatives). It is mysterious, but there is. He also has a site on which the context is presented in his version. Of course, the story with the appointment in the AP is not mentioned there.

There is the last news " Speech on the forum of Sberbank" Russia 2013 ", April 19. Summary: Mr. Gref represents A. Kudrin as the main person of the time of the crisis of 2008-09 and asks him how everything will develop (or will not) further. What new development model is possible, how to behave with a deficit by the budget, whether the rejection of loans is legitimate - with clarification that for economists all this means stopping development. Because then you can’t invest in innovation - they are risky. You can’t lend it - also risks. Innovative production is a risk ... Which of the models will prevail? What Kudrin answered - you can find out by watching the video by the link. Because there is not even conclusions more important there, but a general design. The conclusions are clear: weak institutions, the judicial system, which hinders political control, etc. It is also significant that this performance is posted on the site - and they, presumably, act with analysis. Quite authentic performance.

News a little lower, April 16: " About the case of Navalny
Tomorrow the criminal case begins to obey on the charges of Alexei Navalny and Peter Officer. Everyone understands that this is a significant event and its results will be the subject of studying all politicians, businessmen, investors. In this example, the quality of Russian legal proceedings will be checked again.
... From my point of view, a particular decision of the court in the Navalny case will have an impact on the willingness to open new ones and develop existing businesses, on the investment climate in Russia, after all . "

Or at the beginning of April at Kommersant: “ Two weeks ago, the new government approved no less optimistic forecast of socio-economic development until 2030, which provides for annual growth from 3% to 5.4%. Everything went on duty, without a wide expert and public discussion. Perhaps the reason is that this optimism is extremely difficult .”

And here is what is the most important - a head -hat: " I am sure of the possibility of successful implementation of the script for a calm non -violent transformation of our political system and the entire state ." Where does thoughtfulness come from: will such a purpose (if it is) is purely technical?