Who to plant - Navalny or Ponomarev?

So far, last week, the attention of progressive humanity was riveted to the district court in the city of Kirov, in Moscow the regime dealt an insidious blow to the opposition flank: the information was published that the deputy Ponomarev received 750 thousand dollars from the Skolkovo Foundation. For all the difference in the stories of Navalny and Ponomarev - both of them are about the price.

Navalny, according to investigators, bought “not in the market” firewood cheaply, sold expensive, and put the difference for himself and the accomplices in his pocket. Ponomarev successfully sold his lectures for $ 30 thousand (at the same time, according to the UK, from 10 lectures he gave only two, but received as in ten). Where the difference went - or rather, everything that Skolkovo paid the advanced deputy is still unclear. But many are curious.

Since the second case of Khodorkovsky, the Russian people understand that the price of oil in Nefteyugansk “in the well” is one, and in Rotterdam - completely different. The price of a former military base with a helicopter platform for a public tender is one, and for the son -in -law of the Minister of Defense is completely different. These are the rules of the game.

Prices in Russia are more than mystical phenomenon. You can buy an oil company for 100 million not your money, and then drive for 16 billion - and everything is fine. The price for the Investigative Committee, and for the General Prosecutor's Office, and for the Accounts Chamber is quite a market. After all, they bought in difficult conditions when there were poverty, debts and bandits around, and sold, when the ADR company traded in the West. And you can buy a box of beer in a warehouse, sell at a non -market price and sit for five years. That is, no one has yet managed to make a convincing clear line: where the market price that provides a reasonable entrepreneurial profit ends, and where the infernal sale begins at obviously low (high) prices and theft with laundering.

The universal method of investigation in these cases is an examination. The only problem is that an honest and independent expert in Russia is a very rare phenomenon than a crocodile in December in the Moscow River. Rather, such experts, of course, are, but who will allow them for examination on a resonant criminal case? Who will allow them to determine what the price should be for 10 million tons of oil - Yugansk or Rotterdam? Or how much should an oil company purchased from the state during collateral auctions, and then resold it with a profit of several thousand percent. Therefore, the examination, as a rule, is done by specially trained, well known to the investigation, people who can be relying on.

However, due to new-fashioned creeps, to bring some incomprehensible conclusions of Western experts, it is better not to do the examination, so as not to be substituted. And in the indictment you can write simply: no examination is necessary, and so it is clear that the forest was stolen. The court is fair - it will definitely figure it out.

Against the background of all-Russian confusion in the cost of oil, firewood and old military bases, deputy Ponomarev for some reason decided that his price list at the lecture will also work. Or maybe it was hoped that all the same they would not judge and plant all the oppositionists - in order to avoid the expansion of different “black lists” . But even Chubais did not lift up prices for his books.

Take the highest paid professors - Harvard professors . They receive about $ 200 thousand in a year. With brutal American taxes. For constant lecture and other notary research work. It turns out that the deputy Ponomarev received for ten lectures and “scientific work” as three and a half professor Harvard in a year. Moreover, he gave one of the lectures for 12 minutes, and the second - as much as 18.

Of course, so that everything is by law, you will have to put someone unnecessary from Skolkovo with a “trailer”. That is, the organized criminal community is also loomed. And this is a completely different article and deadlines. Deputy Ponomarev and Skolkovo, obviously, poorly remember the history of Yukos (although Ponomarev should remember it - after all, almost a native organization), where the former manager of business received fifteen and a half years for the alleged distribution. Of which I served almost eight. Moreover, he himself did not find a single Yukosov penny. And here is more than twenty million.

An attempt to prove that in one lecture you can take the annual salary of a Russian professor, strongly resembles a bearded joke about a Georgian-jurisdiction: “He passed by, slipped and fell on a knife. And so he fell fifteen times. " Although a person who can get $ 30 thousand for a 12-minute lecture will not disappear anywhere.