Sorry, bitch, did not finish you

No, well, in fact, even if it is stupid , but stupid have the right to focus on the issue. Such, for example: why should the text for the "total dictation" give Dina Rubin? What, there are no its writers in Russia, without Israeli passports? And the governor who canceled Dina Rubin in his province, he, too, is probably right in something, huh? Freedom of speech, understand? And she spoke about Pozner, without violating any laws. Say, the "state" from a Russian citizen would calmly demolish, and from this, with three passports, I won’t demolish. "So stupid, yes."

So Pushkin, by the way, is the smartest person in Russia, and also said something like this. I say, I despise my fatherland from head to toe - but it is annoying to me if a foreigner shares this feeling with me. It would not be annoying, and in this sense the Ulyana Skiibeda in his own way, but inherits the great traditions throughout the country.

By the way, about Pushkin. Is it good, the same Ulyana was worried on the pages of the same KP two months ago that blacks with African passports play for our football clubs? Do we have a little our own blacks, or what? "Shame and shame on Russian football," yes.

What happened to her now, with our Skybed?

Well, yes, Leonid Gozman allowed himself tactlessness: he compared the SS executioners with executioners from SMERSH. But he was just a purebred Russian citizen, without impurities, and, discussing with him, the famous journalist could at least show promised tolerance. Alas, Ulyana could not restrain the word and allowed, as it were, to say, an offensive miss. I got excited slightly. "Sometimes you regret that from the ancestors of today's liberals, the Nazis did not bother the lampshades." Such words were driven by Columnist into her article and in the subtitle to her.

It turned out bad. First of all, for the Skybeda itself and its nagers. After all, what happened? Posozhev that the ancestors of Goman and other Russian liberals did not end their days in Auschwitz, the Soviet patriot expressed racial solidarity with Hitler. That is, with a personal example, she proved that the Stalinist killers could successfully cooperate with the Nazi. Although in fairness it should be said that the Chekist department did not produce soap and lampshades. Lutti was scary, killed, tortured and robbed, but in aesthetic requests our people were modest. It’s easier or something, without these superhuman excesses.

And here, of course, another question arises: why did she write about the lampshades at all? Why did Columnist slander her native office? Why was it so substituted?

It can be assumed that due to natural stupidity. There is a point of view that, by virtue of other, also natural qualities, but here are epithets that the newspaper is no longer permitted, because the authorities are beating about public morality. But Oleg Kashin believes that there is no science at all. For the Ulyana given to us in the sensations personifies the era, and only she should address the words prohibited by censorship.

I’ll risk objecting: there is a SKOIBed, he himself saw her in the photo. Well, yes, stupid and evil, speaking metaphorically, as a SS creature in the Auschwitz women's hut, but real. The image is also quite reliable, such have not been translated since 1917. “It is a pity I, a bitch, did not finish you off in Vyatka. It hurts you, the Jews, it hurts the Jews ...” - this was not a scoop wrote out in the tabloid, but the character of Galich exhaled, having died half a century ago. And Putin, with the departed Surkov and the eternally alive Sungorkin here, is worthy of mention only in the sense that with them this social group again found a voice and a feather. Moreover, the voice sounds louder, the feather is isolated and naturally honed the thought.

This is a simple thought that runs along a short trodden path. This is a simple logic available dull. From the private - to the general. From petty xenophobia, "Israeli citizen", from blacks and three passports - to soap and lampshades. This is a historically logical path - from state patriotism to the stoves of Auschwitz and the camps of the Gulag. Of course, one must be Ulyana Skybed, in order to so clearly find the indissoluble connection of red with brown, but in essence we did not know anything new, right?

In such cases, Alexander Sergeyevich, sensing something was amiss, immediately grabbed his head and indulged in fierce Russophobia. “You, who is not on a leash, how can you stay in Russia? If the king gives me a settlement , then I will not stay for a month” - and then even worse, it is embarrassed to quote. A certain dose of contempt for the state - it is necessary so as not to go crazy and not to breathe up. Especially to such a state, which presses its citizens, lowers the trained vertukhaev from a leash and imposes a pathological malice to its own and strangers, indiscriminately in society.