And indifferent in their speeches

The very Russophobic speech in the history of the Fatherland was made by Comrade. Stalin. Speaking on May 24, 1945 at a reception in the Kremlin in honor of the commanders of the Red Army forces, the leader raised a glass for the health of the Russian people. “Another people,” said Joseph Vissarionovich, recalling the first two years of the war, “could tell the government: you did not live up to our expectations, go away, we will put another government that will conclude peace with Germany and provide us with peace. But the Russian people did not go for it ..." Hoaring a toast, the audience awarded the speakers by stormy, not decaying for a long time not deceived for a long time applause.

So it was accepted in those years: no matter what Comrade would say. Stalin, the audience began to applaud and could not stop for a long time. Even if he mocked her. Where are you going?

At Comrade Stalin was unlimited power and an excellent sense of humor. The excellent sense of humor, reinforced by unlimited power and well -functioning machine of repression, invariably stuck out at the gathered stormy, for a long time not silented applause. So they applauded, not really thinking about the meaning of the said words. Or afraid to think about it.

Meanwhile, it was said literally the following. The Russian people, saddened by the failures of the first two years of the war, it turns out, could have gathered and re -elect comrade. Stalin. Where to get together? Well, in parliament, where else, and there, strictly observing the democratic procedure, to vote for some other candidate. For the leader of the opposition party, why not, have they not been in Stalinist Russia? However, the people decided that the party led by Comrade. Stalin completely justifies his expectations, although the enemy had already reached Moscow, and did not arrange parliamentary discussions. For this, the best friend of the commanders, partially exterminated on the eve of the war, and led his toast.

Those few devoted to the leader of the leader could even be appreciated, starting with Pavel Sudoplatov, who exactly in the first two years of the war of the personal instructions of Beria conducted separate negotiations with the Nazis. On the conclusion of the new "obscene Brest world" on the condition of abandoning the Baltic states, Belarus, Moldova and parts of Ukraine. Hitler, who had his own ideas about the upcoming "friend of the Government", rejected the proposal.

Why did all this remember?

Yes, everything is also, although I understand that Skyubed was already tired, so as not to say more sharply. The Russian state always despised its people, but in the person of Comrade. Stalin's mockery reached record heights. The leader who elaborate in the country under Lenin, the leader praised the Russians for obedience and fidelity.

This is patriotism from a state point of view, in its very sadistic variety. People are the garbage of history, so the collective scum in essence is indifferent to, from whose skin Ilsa Koch in Buchenwald collected lampshades for her collection. Yes, at least from the leather of prisoners of war-Slavs. These are details. First, the Gulag, then SMERSH, and finally - thanks to Grandfather for the victory. And cruelty in this indifference, perhaps no less than in a direct murder.

State patriotism is inhuman, and this is his radical difference from liberalism. Liberal sorry for people. Each individual person. Regardless of nationality, and there is a paradox, which in the fusion of the discussion has somehow passed the second plan, if it was noticed at all.

The SS men killed mainly strangers, including Jews. SMERSH employees killed their mainly Russians: these are statistics, there were a majority in the communist empire. In addition, to look for Nazi saboteurs and spies among Jews could have come up with only the stupid of Soviet Chekists. How it would be pointless to look for Jews in the army of Vlasov - the most numerous, by the way, of the army of collaborators in the entire world history.

Of course, traitors - they are traitors, but the personal contribution of Comrade. Stalin with his hungerons and class purges in the creation of this army is truly invaluable. And if Hitler, fortunately for all of us Jews and non-Jews, was not an idiot obsessed with racial theory, the war could end differently. Including for comrade Stalin.

That is, what happens? Leonid Gozman, who dared to equate the Smerashens with the SS, essentially stood up for thousands, if not tens of thousands of Russians - victims of the Stalinist terror. And for the Chechens, whom the NKVD fighters burned alive and shot from machine guns in Haibakh. On the contrary, the stately thinking patriot of Skoibed wanted to spit on everyone, including Russian prisoners of Buchenwald, and this is quite natural. The hatred of the liberals, who feel sorry for specific people, replaces all other feelings, and it remains only to guess about the nature of this hatred: class, racial ... However, the replica about the lampshades brings some clarity.

In that historical speech in the Kremlin, raising a glass for the health of the Russian people, comrade. Stalin first called him "leading", which caused special joy among the listeners. They rejoiced in vain, for he was still going to lead the leading people, Joseph Dzhugashvili, and new arrests and executions soon confirmed the immutability of the main course. True, the leader also learned something from the defeated Hitler, and the Jews saved by the Red Army in the late 40s were able to feel it. Together with Russians, Ukrainians, Belarusians and people of other nationalities who returned from the front or forged victory in the rear. Unlike the former, now defeated ally, Comrade. Stalin was an internationalist and he did not care someone to kill. A native country would live.