Blog post

In Russia, it may be prohibited to post recordings from DVRs on the Internet. This proposal - “This is a direct violation of Article 24 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation - the right to private life” - was made by the head of the State Duma Committee on Information Policy, Alexey Mitrofanov. And really angered the bloggers

Hooligan lobby

nrtras: “Registrars and publicity have saved many people from unfair trials and damages; many of those responsible for accidents have been put behind bars. This ban will benefit criminals and hooligans.”

It's not fair

B0gger: “Why can I be filmed by security cameras in stores and the subway, but I can’t film them, I can’t film what’s happening to me personally or what they’re doing to my car? This is the oppression of my freedoms, and this is a corruption law.”

lit up

Maugli: “Then cameras on the roads should be banned, otherwise they take pictures of me and my neighbor, and then send them to my wife - the car is registered to my wife.”

Do it

GeRom: “I would look at the problem more broadly and would forbid people to look at deputy Mitrofanov. And at deputies in general. What’s more, when meeting with any official of a rank not lower than the director of the housing office, I would oblige citizens to lower their eyes and look strictly at their feet.”

Consent required

xuman1: “No one forbids you to film! But it’s really impossible to post on the Internet, to show an image of another person publicly, without his consent. DVRs are also prohibited in Germany. Germans are generally very sensitive to the privacy of personal life.”

Lynching

GenGenych: “Getting a “hero” onto the Internet is often the only punishment our society can impose on him, since government agencies do not always perform their functions properly.”

Blogs read by Natalya Radulova

Stop posting