Ghouls against the sheriff. Remake

The otherworldly voice, parodying the timbre and the intonation of solemnity at the funeral or at the entrance to the St. George Hall of the President of the Russian Federation, opens the debate.

Vampiric lighting. The participants of the debate are assigned to the departments. The speaker lies as if in a vertically set the coffin. Having folded their hands on the chest, not twisting their heads, the dead people have a conversation as if among themselves, but de facto-with a void in front of them. Presumably this "emptiness" - we, viewers. The presenter is strange. He depicts a 10-year-old child who was instructed to hold a communication session with the "rebels from hell." At the same time, he was informed that the dead are harmless and would not be able to leave their coffins - and generally immobilized, except for facial muscles. Therefore, he, as it were, politely bypasses the “booths” and says: “Grandfather Ivan, now your minutes! Uncle Tolya, say! " He cannot moderate it. Because it is not to you “visiting Albats”, but a holiday of living dead from some kind of Kusturitsa film.

Therefore, the comments of the audience are reduced to "Navalny should need a makeup artist," "from Melnikov really makes a grave." Some with approval write that the dead Levich, Mitrokhin, and especially the young vampire Degtyarev were more vigorous than expected ... It is clear that it was the idea of ​​the director of the supply of the director: to place vampires for glass, to push the viewer as far as possible. Make the immobilized corpses talk to each other, as it were, out of non -existence. So that the contrast with our vibrant post -unilateral existence is obvious. We are riding bicycles, walking in Gorky Park, enjoy in the summer. And they - broadcast from non -being.

However, the picture is complicated by the fact that these are “vampires-werewolfs”. Then they lie and talk. And “there” - in daytime reality - Levichv with hordes storms the apartment on Chistoprudny Boulevard. Therefore, there are, as it were, two Levich. One is an intelligent, respectable deceased, which makes a quite favorable impression on educated women (judging by the comments), the other is a monster with a grinder. As soon as the first Levichev leaves the coffin of Debatov, he immediately proceeds to the "Texas Casket of the Chainsaw." Navalny - as it turns out - also two. One is the one that we love in daytime life: easily and convincingly speaking “on cubes” with a street audience. And the second - with a glazed eye, rattling in "two minutes".

However, all this I do not write in order to mock the candidates. And only in order to more clearly indicate that the course announced by the Kremlin on the so -called direct policy - lies, wiring and the next political file.

There is a pond and life. And here blah blah blah and death.

As you know, V. Volodin and experts subordinate to him constantly say that “the sad era of political technologies passed” and finally came the era of “direct politics”. The regions, as they write, come from Moscow to include bright opposition candidates in the elections. The Kremlin political scientist Zudin recently published a large software article on how “political competition” is already being successfully introduced in accordance with the Epistle of V.V. Putin to the 2012 Federal Assembly.

But any of us, looking at these so-called debate on Moscow-24, clearly understands that their format is something directly reverse how real debate in the space of modern competitive policy occur. Out of respect for society, the TV channel will not emphasize the ghouls with the help of television aesthetics. Here we see great efforts aimed at pushing the entire group of candidates in a special space as far as possible as far as possible from the viewer. These debates do not have any novelty symbolizing the offensive of the dawn of political competition. This is the same dull format, worked out in the Surkovo elections to the smallest detail in 2005-2010, designed to emphasize the non-alternativeness of our dear Sergey Semenovich. Which - without any debate - at the same time launches fish with his own hand into the Moscow pond. For there is a pond and life. And here blah blah blah and death.

These “debates” are simply a clear evidence of the complete impossibility of realizing the concept “give political competition without replacement power”. And I would like - yes it doesn’t work out - to circumvent a difficult contradiction: if the initial condition is the “preservation of the system” and the endless stay in the power of the same small group of specific people, then the next requirement - “give political competition” is already impossible. Today, about 20%segment of citizens who want not just Navalny or Prokhorov, but want to establish a system of replacement of power as a result of elections, well, it is impossible! Impossible. Therefore, the television aesthetics itself gives out the shyler intentions of these initiators of the “direct policy”.