They did not disappoint

In the middle of the night, it was a message that all the ministers of the Moscow government had gathered at the city hall, and later Volodin himself joined them. And if this was true, then the picture was drawn at the same time heroic and tragic. The ministers, led by the first deputy head of the presidential administration, jointly held the rating of Sergei Sobyanin. Manually, like Atlanteans. At the mark of 51% with a penny, risking every minute to be buried under its debris.

The picture fascinated and aroused in the head of different thoughts, a predominantly sad properties.

First of all, about legitimacy, about how great its price is. It turned out that for the sake of gaining this very legitimacy, the current authorities were ready to take mortal risk. At least in Moscow and Yekaterinburg, where the authorities practically abandoned the carousels, stuffing and other methods of conducting controversy with the opposition, so characteristic of the era of controlled democracy. That is, of course, on all guestelekanals and TVC, journalists praised a self -nominated person, and in the plots dedicated to his main opponent, hostility was disturbed, but the election procedure itself was organized almost exemplary.

It was also thought about what thin ice Sobyanin went on to legitimately elect for a second term. About the largest geopolitical disaster of the 21st century - the output of Navalny on the second round - thought during these hours, and, by the way, it cannot be said that the threat passed. For the opponent of a self-nominated person is still unhappy and intends to challenge the decision of the Moscow Cityism and Volodin himself on the streets, squares, or even in courts. Under the far -fetched pretext that the power with his own hands kept Sobyanin's shaky rating.

Finally, it was thought that all this means in general.

This is a low turnout, for example. Before that is low that in the Moscow City Workshop could not count it for a long time. Citizens do not care, or something, on honest elections and legitimacy of the authorities? Or do not know their happiness? Or simply do not believe that there are elections that are not taken by buses and do not drive entire universities and budget enterprises, forcing you to take off the cross on the mobile, which you put near the name of the right candidate, and otherwise the Sulia is a continuous way of life? Are you weaned, or something, from normal will for only 13 years? This is a negligible term by historical standards.

And on the other hand, that so fascinated the power in this word "legitimacy"? For so many years they lived without him, did not pursue, they pumped oil without sadness - and suddenly they sharpened it, according to the legitimacy, which, translated into Russian, means only the consent of the people with the authorities. Well, that is, when the authorities do not lie and does not steal, if it is quite simple, and the people agree with it in this.

Strange too. For so many years they have been engaged exclusively with theft and lies, and the authorities did not stagger, and the ratings in the department, which in fairness was called Churovsky, were drawn what was needed. Mystery.

Perhaps the collective Volodin, accustomed to constant victories, is also Surkov and he himself believed in the statistical infallibility of his nominees and self -nominates. So they believed that it could not have occurred to his mind: voluntarily not all of them would go out to vote for any of them. And you have to manually all night if you do not support, then drown the rating, so that God forbid to prevent the adversary to Moscow.

Or the plan was even simpler and stupid, based on the same reckless faith in the voter. Say, Sergei Semenych beloved by Muscovites will easily win in the first round (the deduced Oslons at first predicted at first), and here we, armed with a dracol, the judicial system and legitimacy, will plant Navalny seriously. And now, when he almost went into the second round, the weakened Atlanteans are scratching the turnip and think what to do next. Either plant, or to agree.

And if you start a real dialogue with society, then no supports are enough to keep this system. Not to mention the legitimacy, which came out terribly flimsy, nondescript, painful, on crutches, causing pity and bitter laughter. I want to cry straight, looking at her, a curly tire. Will he survive the winter?