Since the emergence of the bill on the reform of the Russian Academy of Sciences in the description of what is happening, military terminology has been intensively used: “Blitzkrieg”, “Positional War”, “Fifth Column”, “Severe Artillery”. And now large-caliber artillery, beating with smelly mud: Ren-TV, has been launched.
There are very real spots on the reputation of the Academy of Sciences. Apparently, like any corporation. The Trinity Option has repeatedly wrote about them with the aim of isolate and not to grow. However, there are different genres - criticism and Pasquil, the difference between them is clear to everyone. Pasquilus can also be of different “qualities” depending on the number of lies and speculation used. The film REN-TV “Diagnostics of the Russian Academy of Sciences” refers precisely to this genre, and it apparently did not seem enough real compromising materials, and provocations, speculations and direct lies were launched.
A little backstory.
The rumor that Ren-TV is preparing a film-provocation against the Academy of Sciences appeared two weeks ago. The first confirming signal was the letter of a biologist, the permanent author of the Trv-hunger Alexei Krushelnitsky, in which he said that the journalist from Ren-TV tried to interview him about the organization associated with the Academy of Sciences, called "Acadinotorg". This is really one of the above spots on reputation.
Suspicion of corruption (supply of foreign equipment for scientific research at prices often exceeding market ones, sometimes strongly strongly) falls on ACHECTORG. Alexei once fought with the Acadrantorg on the pages of the Trinity Option, which is why they turned to him. However, Alexei realized that the attack was not conducted on ACCHECTORG, but to the Academy of Sciences and refused to talk.
Where a serious attack was held on Fian and its director Gennady the month. Judging by the fact that the first shot dates from July 1, the month was appointed target in advance, even before the beginning of "hostilities". In the newspaper Versia, an article was published about the fact that, speaking in the language of Internet memes, Gennady stole not only the entire forest, but all of oil for a month. In particular, he organized the conveyor defense of linden dissertations of officials along with the Forter (Dissernet, along with Parkhomenko, Zayakin and Rostovtsev nervously giggle).
After that, the rest of the text can no longer be read, except - to have fun. The author (the unknown Google Peter Ivanitsky) drives the idea that Gennady is a terrible person. The recipe is traditional - facts are taken, a direct lie is added, all this is watered with speculation and obsessive hints. For example, the deputy was beaten. Director and soon died. The motive is invented (interfered with fraud) and a hint is made (we did not find anything about it in the open press-to know, we cleaned the information-for a reason).

Since there are many diverse facts around a person for a long active life, of which you can always take something for such cooking. In this case, it can be seen that the contractor was clearly hacking, not bothering to give himself the appearance of common sense (deputy director of the Rossiya Hotel escaped responsibility for the fire only thanks to the powerful connections of the young Doctor of Sciences from Tomsk by the name of the month, etc.). Naturally, you can’t publish such hacks in a decent publication even with a high feed, so the article appeared in Versia.ru and Compromat.ru .
It would be possible to not pay attention to this if the same Ren-TV did not take up the Gennady of the month.
- At the conference, a journalist approached him, waved a sheet of paper, saying that there was a signature of the month on this text, and if he did not agree to talk with him, he will publish this document. The month answered: "Get out!"
-Renting group Ren-TV tried to visit his house. Having received a refusal, she visited the neighbors. Journalists were inquisitive if there was a month of a mistress and whether there was something else behind him. We visited the son. The daughter of that same deputy was dut out. The director who was beaten and then died. They have not achieved anything anywhere, but modern installation products work miracles.
-Ren-TV filming a film crew was visited by Fian. Moreover, she was denied the aisle, but they entered either through the passage of the Institute of General Physics, or through a hole in the fence (which exists). They were interested in the reconstruction of the old building of the nuclear nucleus laboratory (under this reconstruction - the transformation into the center of high -temperature superconductivity - Vitaly Ginzburg at one time knocked out special financing in the amount of 900 million rubles, of which 200 million were received). One of the members of the directorate, not being warned, cordially accepted the crew and led them to the construction site. He enthusiastically explained everything until he was fanned by the question “where to go more than two billion rubles” (to overpower, so by an order of magnitude - why trifle).
- The most touching episode has already been told in Gazeta.ru . A young man appeared in Fian, who was called a student at the Fiztekh, who wanted to talk with a month about scientific work. The Fiztekh instantly split real physical education, and the guy opened up. Yes, he is from REN-TV, he himself has nothing against Fian, but there is an order, and the order comes from very serious people, because they are all a lid.
And then the film was shown. Of the real compromising circumstances, it uses an elite house on the territory of the Institute of Physical Problems, a hostel for graduate students and employees, turned into a hotel. “Acaduinthorg” either left for later, or did not collect the material, or received the team not to touch. Now it’s hard to understand the background of all the plots. I managed to talk with the month and his deputy Alexei Hippius, whom I completely trust, so I pay the greatest attention to this storyline.
- In the film deputy. Directors of Fian are reproached for lies - they say, he said that 10 million was allocated for major repairs, and then the figure 200 sounds. In fact, 10 million was allocated for current repairs this year, 200 million is a special financing for the reconstruction of the corps at the moment. The film refers to 2.5 billion. This is a direct lie, such a figure related to Fian, in nature does not exist.
- The most vile plot is the death of Deputy Director Yuri Alexandrov. The film says that Alexandrov died in the hospital two weeks after beating. In fact, he left the hospital, returned to work and died at home about a month and a half - from diabetes, which he suffered in severe forms for a long time, although the beating could also affect. But the main abomination is not in this, but in speculation. The viewer is pushing to the idea that the month has dealt with the unypted deputy.
Most of the plots rely on two types of heroes: offended and careless. Offended: Academician Krokhin (was not elected to the post of director of the Trinity Branch Fian), paleontologist Vladimir Zadogallo (quarreled with colleagues), former chairman of the Council of Young Scientists of the Russian Academy of Sciences Vera Mysina. This is a very bright character. It is not clear how she got to this post in general. Family people found only three articles with her with the maximum number of citation. But in collaboration with Leonid Malinovsky, a book was written, in which the synthesis of “model design thinking” (microns) and “Aryan values” is proposed (their own reincarnation is revered by Orthodoxy) ”, which will save the world from“ world dominance of the Jewish oligarchy and the shadow world government ”(see the Trvo-hunker No. 102, 2012.04.24). According to the historian, the member of the RAS Askold Ivanchik, this is a pseudoscience of the worst germ. It is clear that she surrendered offenses from the scientific community, which resulted in not only in the loss of the post of chairman of the SMU, but also in a friendly ridicule. In the film, she portrays a tragic sacrifice with which it was decided to end. " For Pasquil - just a find.
Among the heroes of the film were also quite adequate people who did not understand what was happening. For example, deputy. Director of the Institute of Oceanology Alexei Sokov and chief researcher at the same institute Alexander Gorodnitsky (the same). They came to them with Ren-TV to talk about science. And when the conversation switched from science to their fights with the Presidium of the Russian Academy of Sciences (and who did not butt with him?), They said the words necessary for the authors of the film.
For the future. If one of the scientists did not yet understand how to communicate with representatives of REN-TV, we recall the past story. Employees of GAISH Academician Anatoly Chereshchuk, Doctor of Sciences Vladimir Lipunov and Sergey Popov were invited to speak there in a popular science program. They talked about black holes, gamma-free and other cosmic exotic. The program was mounted and supplemented by a dialect in the announcement so that they seemed to carry anti -talented nonsense. Therefore, a huge request to all scientists to pay attention to the document below. In order to avoid carelessness.
On this I propose to consider the topic closed. The main goal of the publication is to prescribe-I hope it has been achieved. Let's take into account the point of view of the Paleontological Institute, whose leadership, according to the film, stole all the bones from the museum. “Sorry, but we did not find ourselves in the trash so that, as they put it on the Internet,“ feed the trolls ”. Our institute and the museum have a reputation, and there is a reputation for the REN-TV channel-both of them are well-known. Remember Khoju Nasreddin: “He already managed to calculate that in this conversation with the guard, every word costs him more than ten Tang” - so this is the very case. ”
Statement
Scientific Council of the State Astronomical Institute. PC. Sternberg Moscow State University named after M.V. Lomonosov regarding the dirty methods of work of certain media and, above all, TV-3 and REN-TV television channels
We, the scientists of the GAISH, professors and teachers of the astronomical department of the Faculty of Physics of Moscow State University, express our indignation and protest against the dirty and shameless methods of the work of some media, especially TV-3 and REN-TV.
The programs of these channels are replete with adversaries of pseudoscientific content that fool the country's population. At the same time, these pseudoscientific transfers are often formed by unscrupulous compilation of various parts of scientific programs with the participation of professional scientists with the stringing of these scientific parts of the delusional fabrications of producers and journalists. At the same time, the opinion of professional scientists who fell into such a “set-up” is not asked. Thus, the copyright law is grossly violated and moral damage is caused by those scientists who have ever given a scientific interview or participated in a scientific program.
We urge all scientists of Russia not to interview the Ren-TV and TV-3 television channels and not participate in the programs on these television channels.
With regard to other media, it is apparently time to demand the conclusion of a written contract before the interview or transfer, so that in the case of dirty methods of media work, scientists can reasonably sue them.
Chairman of the Academic Council GAISH MSU
Academician RAS A.M. Turtle