Plagiatic request

Vladimir Volfovich looks in the root : the problem of plagiarism should be considered dialectically. On the one hand, thieves - they are thieves, and those people's chosen ones who are convicted of attributing other people's dissertations should be deprived of academic degrees. And on the other hand, “we hire drivers”, if you have been in bulk, but reluctance to sit behind the wheel, and even more so in the morning to drag into the metro service early in the morning. Merciful work should be respected.

So with dissertations. You say a referent to find a ready -made dissert or man who has fallen in this business, unfasten the grandmothers, distilty what the doctor prescribed, and become a letter. He rolls you - and you are going. Up the career ladder, all of itself so titled.

Conclusion: steal, but do not get into it. And if you catch, then with a worthy look, solidly abandon the scientific title. In the end, you did not do anything shameful, just a car along with the District, it turns out, was listed in theft. The LDPR leader calls for mercy and humility.

Doctor of Philosophy, Honored, and the hereditary lawyer V.V. Zhirinovsky has long changed the image. The shoemaker’s dreams of the Indian Ocean, dousing the opponent with live juice, dragging the hair by the hair - all this is already a story. Of course, if the grandfather is very angry, he can still shake the antiquity and recall the habits of combat youth. However, age takes its own, and the blue eyes of Vladimir Volfovich are increasingly radiating indulgence and wisdom. In the conflict of academicians with unicorns, he chose the role of a peacekeeper.

Scientists, creatively processing writing experience, walk near the Duma and massively accuse the deputies of Pzhiv and their accomplices in plagiarism. Moreover, among the exposed figures of copy-paste, the son of the ex-vice-speaker, the current vice-speaker of the lower house Lebedev, is also mentioned. It turns out that the new law on wounds is going to adopt patented plagiators, and this is a strong move to the discussions of academicians with legislators. There is a situation that I want to call paradoxical.

The reaction of deputies is predictable. They are very angry and accuse the opponents of blackmail. It looks like hysteria and generally sounds unconvincing. Here, after all, how: either you crooks and thieves, or lawmakers. It is impossible to blackmail a honest person with reminders of past fraud.

On the contrary, Zhirinovsky is calm. At the request of the Kremlin curators or by itself, feeling that the authorities were confused, the former scandalist skillfully reduces the degree of discussion. When at the meeting of the Duma Oksana Dmitrieva, the only one of all, asks to let in the Picketchiki freezing room on the street, Girinovsky objects, but in his corporate identity: "Who prevented academics from imprisoning us?" And the whole story comments in the sense that the crooks in vain wrote off dissertations, but in fact there is nothing to blame them for. Well, they attached their legs to someone else's car, with whom it does not happen.

As for the law, then Vladimir Volfovich will support it if the namesake replacement from the Kremlin. If from there they break through that the law is still damp and it would be better not to bring academicians to sin and rebellion, then, having thrown off the macomor’s mask, he will act an irreconcilable protector of oppressed science and angrily branded those who intended to adopt a worthless law. It is now possible and even fashionable: the party "United Russia" today does not kick, is it a lazy one. The well -fed, prosperous, state -forming uncles unexpectedly turned into beating boys.

It is funny, however, academicians joined this game with all the passion. The rally on the Okhotny series, scientists stigmatized mainly unicorn, as if not realizing that there was actually no party in power. That the copypasters gathered in the Duma, like Zhirinovsky, have nothing for or against the reform of the Russian Academy of Sciences. What they will tell them in the presidential administration, they will vote, and this is your science with a blue flame. The trouble is that they say every time they say.

However, the rules of the game were not invented today, and when the unfortunate Vladimir Fortov, the president of the Russian Academy of Sciences, rushes between his wards and Putin, he also knows how and with whom to talk. Therefore, he listens to the criticism of unicorn from academicians affectionately, and in relation to the guarantor asks not to allow sharp statements in order to avoid the worst. That is why in “Letter 400”, as if addressed to the tops of the fate of the Academy of Sciences, in that long scroll, where the plagiarists are listed, Putin’s cheerful name is not found. Although at one time there was a loud story , and a reminder of it these days would seem very appropriate.

By the way, Zhirinovsky was smarter than everyone, even Putin, although this is impossible. Enchanting a great science, he presented as a dissertation to amazed philosophers and sociologists all a hundred volumes of his party books. That is, 11 volumes of personal, deeply suffered “thoughts” on the topic “past, present and future of the Russian nation,” which was in fairness recognized as invaluable to the theory and practice of domestic philosophy, history, political science and what else happens there. The question of hired drivers did not even arise, because the cowria was on the rostrum and, fluently retelling the ideas accumulated in the head and in books, with all his appearance the very thought of plagiarism. Such a driver was not born yet.