
Ufa Leninsky District Court explained that the editorial materials of the Inosmi site of the RIA Novosti group are not extremist, Rapsei reports. Only comments of one of the users are recognized as such a court decision.
The court noted that the linguistic study, on the basis of which the decision was pleased, were subjected to the user's comments. "The court in the decision of 13.05.2013 recognized as extremist comments under the nickname" Morpeh ", expressed by the latter on 09/12/2012 to the theses indicated before the comments. The abstracts themselves are not extremist," the judge Anatoly Ilyin said.
“We are grateful to the court, the republican prosecutor’s office and the management of Roskomnadzor for the efforts that helped to completely clarify the procedure for applying this decision. This explanation removed the ambiguity in the interpretation of what kind of content on the Inosmi website to be extremist,” said Svetlana Mironyuk, chief editor of RIA Novosti.
On October 4, the RIA Novosti group announced the intention to appeal to Roskomnadzor, the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the Ministry of Justice and the Supreme Court in connection with the court decision, which recognized the editorial material of the Inosmi extremist.
RIA Novosti also intends to initiate a discussion of changes in the current laws in the field of media regulation in order to prevent situations when the imperfection of law enforcement allows you to block any electronic media without the right to protect the editorial office, ”the agency said.
The decision of the Leninsky District Court of Ufa became known only at the end of September this year, when the Ministry of Justice once again updated the federal list of extremist materials on his website, which was formed on the basis of court decisions that have entered into legal force.
In accordance with the wording of the decision of the Leninsky Court of Ufa, extremist materials, the user's comments under the nickname "Morpeh" found on "Inosmi" were recognized: "Do not lie to yourself"; "Both others underestimate the Islamic threat"; "There are suspicions that the advocates of radical Islam are negatively related to Western countries, support terrorism and are not going to integrate into the social environment in which they live."
The last proposal is fully contained in the translation of the article by the political scientist Rimvidas Ragauskas "Paradox of multiculturalism: tolerance in relation to non -recovery?" From the Lithuanian magazine Geopolitika, which is still available on the site "Inosmi". Therefore, if we consider the court decision literally, and the article itself, neutral in content, also carries signs of extremist materials.
In RIA Novosti, they considered that there was no real reason to consider this case in court, because the MorpeH user who commented on the articles on the Inosmi website was blocked by the resource editors in January after Roskomnadzor pointed out signs of extremism in his other comments.
According to the lawyers of the agency, when considering this case in the Lenin Court of Ufa, the right of "Inosmi" to judicial protection was violated. The editors were not informed of the upcoming court examination, and the court did not notify her of the court’s decision and, thus, deprived the editors of the opportunity to protect himself in court. Due to the incomplete informing, the statute of limitations expired, in connection with which the Inosmi was deprived of the opportunity to demand a review of the decision in the court of the next instance.
"The recognition of an extremist phrase" does not have to lie to yourself is absurd. A simple search on the Internet indicates that it occurs thousands of times in various literary and journalistic works. If you literally fulfill this decision, then when one of the country's leaders in their speech, the next day of the sanctions, can be applied to all the media that quoted this part. Speech, ”Mironyuk said then.