To include and dodge

A wide discussion on the topic "Navalny called citizens to" Russian march ", but he did not go" near the end. Preliminary results were summed up by Oleg Kashin . In the dry residue, a paradoxical, but almost undeniable conclusion: the youth went to Lublin to throw Zigi, confronts the fascist state.

This happens to us at all.

You can recall at least 1993, when General Grachev’s tanks were defended by young democracy in Russia, while General Makashov spoke a defender of parliamentarism. However, it was a paradox of the transition era, and now, when the regime has been established, it is already about phenomena that have to be called logical.

On the one hand, the state with its spiritual scrapers, that is, corporate capitalism of the mafia warehouse, medieval obscurantism in the Duma and in the Church, political stakes and barbed wire from Zhirinovsky. On the other hand, “ Russian marches ”, which this time swept through dozens of Russian cities, as if aggravating festive moods on the day of popular unity. And murders .

Polls of the Levada Center show interesting dynamics in the development of these moods. Amazing numbers. Irritation, hostility, fear in relation to immigrants from the southern republics is experienced by 61% of the population. The call "Russia for Russians" with all their souls or "within reasonable limits" support 66% of caring citizens. The slogan "Stop feeding the Caucasus" approves or rather approves 71% of respondents. Mass bloody clashes on national grounds expect or allow 63% of respondents. 54% offer to limit the residence of Caucasians (citizens of the Russian Federation, between us), and 45% of the natives from the Central Asian republics offer.

These are very serious numbers, and if you do without moral assessments and evaluative judgments directly prohibited by law, then this should be said. Not a single politician who wants to really be elected and be elected can in his programs, performances and posts on social networks not take into account these sentiments. He cannot these millions of his compatriots who are behind the participants in the survey, compare with the Nazis how they partly deserve it. And if he wishes to take his soul and brand xenophobia, then it is better not to go to the polls. The results will disappoint him.

Of course, it is not difficult, deepening into the details, to try to explain to citizens the causes of interethnic friendship, which has become so aggravated in recent years. Talk, for example, about the Caucasian problem as a legacy of two monstrous wars. About the problem of migrants as an integral part of our peculiar economy, unthinkable without kickbacks and slave labor. We can talk about visas, explaining to the electorate that with the help of open borders, our national leader, for whom you voted, is exchanging his geopolitical birth injury - the collapse of the indestructible USSR. That he hopes to somehow gather them under the Russian wing, although it does not work even with Belarus.

However, all these are only words, and the population longs for real deeds: closed boundaries and passport regime for dark and bearded. And if the visas, spitting on the main geopolitical catastrophe of the twentieth century, can still be introduced, then the Caucasus must either be separated according to the Girinovsky methodology, or tolerate. Or in vain they fought, killed, cleaned, tortured, demolished from the face of the earth? Everything is not in vain, citizens, and on the day of popular unity, as in all other days of the week, we firmly remember that Russia survived, observing the celebration of national policy. That fascism is man -made here. Created by these very tested hands of the president and his puppeteers, an invincible and legendary army, revived in Chechnya, and incredible efforts of special services.

Therefore, everyone is talking about "who came up" as a real problem. From Sobyanin to the last Degtyarev, including the most simple -minded of the liberals - Mitrokhin. Moreover, it is brighter than others - Alexei Navalny, who is easier to speak out on a given topic that he is ready to answer the questions of sociologists along with his people. Such a Navalny biography, such beliefs, such a will to power, so favorably distinguishes it from all other opposition politicians. Alexey Anatolyevich is organic in his statements, and when he calls on citizens to go to the “Russian March”, and when he himself reasonably evades him, due to his personal modesty, you believe him unaccountably.

Well, how not to show solidarity with future voters, if their darkness and darkness? And what to do there yourself, on this march, surrounded by professional provocateurs, stupid competitors and zigating youngsters? Not to mention the fact that during communication with a diverse, mostly intelligent fans, he somehow weaned from such a completely homogeneous crowd.

And when he then argues for a long time and generally kindly with upset liberals and listens to the words of fierce support and praise from a selfless fan , he probably approves in the thought that everything does correctly. Everything is generally right. These go there, these - here, these, dumbfounded, stand still, they argue, clean, while others objected sharply - they say, the shoulder must be substituted, and not to beat in the back, and life continues.

The real life of a real policy in a seriously ill country continues, with which he feels blood kinship and similar symptoms. And for the sake of achieving power, that is, the fulfillment of their mission, is ready for literally everything. Go to marches and do not go to marches. Sit in prison and on a luxurious corporate party. To smash crooks and thieves and collect their voices, cast by order.

As for the discussions on the most fundamental topics, they quickly end, and he knows about this better than Akunin and Shenderovich. Because the debaters have nowhere to go and there is no one else to vote for that political desert that formed in the territory of the "Russian marches". True, in the fascist, according to the Kashin, there is no normal election, but for a practicing politician this is not an obstacle, but a guide to action. So, it is necessary to lead the crowd and not get lost in it. In one way: to call, but not to walk yourself.

True, those who came can not forgive that he has dodged, and here it is especially useful to discuss with liberals. Opening their eyes to the national nature of the gaining power of a pogrom civil society. Demonstrating the proximity to the people, which is a distinctive feature of a true politician.