Translated material
Navalny processing
The seventh process in the case of Alexei Navalny, like all the previous ones, did not arise from scratch. “There was nothing to run into,” the representative of the Investigative Committee Vladimir Markin said in an interview with Izvestia newspaper. The idea of the representative was developed in the documentary of the NTV television channel "Gynecology of Navalny", dedicated to the separatist speeches of the opposition against the Rotenberg brothers, as well as the subcontractor of the processing company, recorded on the surrogate mother of the cousin of the cousin of the brother of Navalny, 500 thousand gynecological seats belonging to LLC "Herkhniy". As a rollback during transportation by an unidentified person of medical furniture and the provision of other services, as the head of the investigative group of the IC of the Russian Federation told the television channel. Low quality video recording, in which unknown citizens, inadvertently talking among themselves, were clearly preparing for the worst, became important evidence in this matter.
The preliminary results of the investigation were summed up by the president. “This gentleman,” he said, carefully choosing the words, “he himself should be honest, and only then blame others for corruption. And he, as you know, is dishonest, this gentleman. True, I did not study in detail what they are acquired there, but this gentleman does not cause trust in me.”
Commenting on the words of the president, his press secretary Dmitry Peskov answered the hundredth time to the question of why Putin does not call Navalny's name. “This is not for the recording,” as always, the spokesman warned, “but if he calls his name, irreparable can happen.” The editors of the newspaper Kommersant, which, in connection with the technical lining, again published this sensational news, was fired in full force. The building on Vrubel Street is demolished from the face of the earth. The most famous special correspondent was seen sobbing in ruins.
The experts interviewed by us evaluate the seventh process in the case of Alexei Navalny. “This is a Kremlin project,” political scientists close to power believe. “Lesha is their troll,” say observers from the environment of the informal leader of the Russian opposition. “Gable wiring, I don’t know,” Gleb Pavlovsky comments on the situation. Eduard Limonov emphasizes that if he had obeyed him and did not increase people from the Square of the Revolution to Bolotnaya, then Russia would be free. “And so they will shoot him now, and I even feel sorry for him somewhere, and I am not at all gloating,” the writer admits in an interview with NTV correspondent.
The process is intensely discussed in the press and in Runet. The scatter of opinions is wide, but dreary evaluative judgments prevail, the essence of which boils down to what has been hesitated with their gynecology. With Dmitry Bykov’s poem “We will all die”, who wittily describes the course of the six previous processes and occupied the entire number of “Novaya Gazeta”, readers can familiarize themselves with the pages of the publication. The lyrical eight -west, written about the seventh case of Navalny, the poet Vsevolod Emelin, was published on the writer’s blog, but is irreversible in the press.
Meanwhile, the Basmanny Court of Moscow issued another, sixth decision on the arrest and assignment, imposed on the accounts and property of the Navalny brothers, their relatives and some supporters. It is curious that the number of these supporters is constantly growing, the majority have nowhere to live, and they go out onto the streets, gathering on the Manezhnaya, Lubyansk, red and other squares of the capital. This leads to skirmishes with the police, who are less and less, since they populate the apartments of the punished, while the homeless brothers Navalny, including the Navalny themselves, are more and more. The administration of the Kremlin, the FSB and the Ministry of Internal Affairs indicates the illegal nature of this kind of procession. However, specialists in constitutional and housing law object to them, referring to the legal norm that grants a Russian citizen the right to a home.
Who is right? The philosophers involved as experts think that time will judge time. Millions of the homeless brothers Navalny, filling the city, consider it differently. They believe that time has already come. The next meeting in the seventh case of disagreement, as we have just been informed, is postponed indefinitely, and this gives the plot an unpredictable and somewhere even irreversible character. As well as meaningless and merciless, as psychiatrists, historians and philologists tell us.