Goethe from Old Square

Letter to Olga Romanova about Faust, Mephistopheles and certain shortcomings of the work of the Presidential Administration of the Russian Federation

Dear Olga Evgenievna, a tested combat comrade and brother!

Not even a couple of days have passed since the moment you and I drank (moderately) for humanism and the world of peace and bite (even more moderately) - and the editorial office had an amazing force. It is written as if in accordance with the paradox of Faust: "This is impossible and that is why it is reliable." You ask, colleague, what does Faust have to do with it and who in our soulless time “wandered around with the lyre; Under the sky of Schiller and Goethe ”? So I will answer you: creators working for immortal, like Faust, the domestic policy of the Presidential Administration. PR managers who are preparing a dish of political Kremlin cuisine, not affected by the worms of doubt, under the name "Political and Information threats of the next week." Experts aiming their propaganda Faustpatron on the innocent souls of Russians.

We got a document describing threats and answers to them for the period of November 4–11 of this year. "I have to do with it?!" - You exclaim and light a thin cigarette contrary to the latest orders of the party and government. So I will answer you again. And for starters, I will quote a fragment, which is a description of the actions in response to the threat of the “politicization of the opposition” of the process of Ilya Farber. You are on it, in the process, as they write in the administration, you earn political capital (probably because you could not make another). But these are all the little things of life, born of the tired brain of a political strategist, overcoming the inadquire cordons of the FSO on the Old Square. And creativity - here he is. Quote: “With the help of social media: October 29, 2013, O. Romanova visited Germany and posted on her Facebook account photos of the house, where, according to legend, Dr. Faust signed an agreement with Mephistopheles ... using bloggers, Ironically draw a parallel: experience gained experience in signing agreements with concluded.”

This is called "physicists joke." We need a forced sunbeam. Organizational comrades also have something to answer: “In the future: to consider the possibility of specializing several NPOs receiving presidential grants on the problem of protecting the rights of prisoners. The interception of this subject from opposition organizations ... to consider the possibility of specializing one of the youth movements on promotions in support of prisoners during the trial. "

As they say, we will forgive gloomy - how many creators know that the judicial investigation is conducted in relation to the defendants, and not prisoners. The main thing is that now you know that the field on which your “sitting Rus'” works will now become competitive. Market relations and theft of ideas penetrate into politics. The threat of the UK, the prosecutor’s office, the FSB, the courts and the FSINA will from now on will come directly from the Old Square, where young and not very young PR people with notebooks of their poems graze.

In general, the administration fight not only with you, but also with other numerous slanderers of Russia, working in different azimums. Take the same Farber. These liberal media, comrades from the square (not swamp) write in every possible way, will use the Information (consideration of Farber’s complaint about the verdict) to “accuse the authorities of double standards: they plant teachers for a bribe of 300 thousand rubles, while officials are incomparably exceeding the amounts ( that exceeding?“ Style! ” - as we wrote in the fields of manuscripts in the good old times, when we and we You, Olga Evgenievna, only burst into a bang into big journalism . What are the frauded political scientists who work, as noted in the document, in the style of “neutral analysis”, are responsible to these predictable cereal accusations: the topic of corruption is unprofitable for the opposition, because it is “densely intercepted by power”.

But life, as they say, is tougher. What are the “easy punishments”! After A.E. Serdyukov plunged into the idiocy of rural life and began to test automatic vehicles, the anti-corruption agenda of the authorities somehow damped and faded. And to the question from the film "Tractorists" (1939): "What is sick of the car?" - You can answer exactly in the same way as before: corruption, cumenism and nonsense.

But with all due respect to the close to you, Olga Evgenievna, Faust you are ours (where is your Mephistopheles?), The topic of Farber, I personally consider the Grinupus case to be the most striking: political and international isolation of the Russian Federation. ” “What is the isolation of the Russian Federation? This is the USA in isolation! " -The receipt of cash taxpayers and half a litrologists who do not know other language, except for the dialect of the applications of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Tass from the times of Gromyko A.A. Therefore: “Through social networks ( how many people are fed from the native administration in social networks! - A.K. ) Throw the version that the provocation of Greenpeis and a series of calls ( you feel , growing emotio . - A.K. ) to the rejection of parts of its territory - the links of one chain (here it is! TASS is authorized ... - A.K. ) . Campaign, whose goals: to distract the world public from US failures and undermine the increasing influence of the Russian Federation. ”

As comrade N.L. Gordeev, leading morning charging on Soviet radio: “Daabatom! We go to water procedures! "

It remains only to name the guilty of the rejection of the territories - VSHE professor Sergei Medvedev, who paid attention to the pollution of the Arctic, Evgeny Albats and Marat Gelman. They obviously run to the State Department for instructions - how to better distract the world public from the failures of their overseas owners. By the way, all these exercises in writing the texts of the end of the 1940s were carried out in close logical connection with the visit of the King of the Netherlands Willem-Alleksandra to Moscow ... As people who professionally monitor television prompting, in accordance with the instructions of this “Temnik”, the plot was shown “who wants to divide Russia?” With those very defendants.

As you remember, Olga Evgenievna, for a week on November 4–11, was a “Russian March”. We understand that in the field of nationalist ballet the main competitors of the authorities are ultra -right. Firstly, they violate the monopoly of power to nationalism. Secondly, the authorities must be paid tribute to her, not interested in extreme and extremist scenarios of the development of events. Therefore, the creative people meet the “Russian march” with a message that “on the Day of National Unity this year, the celebration of the Kazan Icon of the Mother of God, as well as the beginning of the new 1435 in the hijra, is symbolic.” But the opposition are again to blame for everything. Therefore, it is important to again turn to the endless stream of political scientists, who should “note that the nationalist agenda is artificially heated by opposition politicians and the media. It is based on it ( sound signature! We love such stylistic beauties! - A.K. ) not nationalism as such, but hatred of ethnic crime. ”

That is, in the Kremlin and on the Old Square, it is seriously believed that ethnic crime is the basis of all troubles. And then they are excited from the consequences - the same “experts” who sold the soul not to Mephistopheles, but only the administration, must “carefully admit” that law enforcement officers are in many ways. By the way, in case of riots during the “Russian march”, such a brave answer was proposed to Kerzon: “... to remind you that the permission was issued by local authorities, and after the events in Biryulyovo. So, they took responsibility for ensuring order. ”

And the pens-here they are! We have nothing to do with it.

Apparently, very different people work on the document, because in the answers to the challenges there are a lot of rational, not too much like the tonality of the fight with you, man and Faust. For example, it is said about the need to “shift the focus in the problem of nationalism and the Caucasus to the question of corruption. “Feed” or “not to feed” the Caucasus - the wrong statement of the question, as well as: to allocate or not to allocate funds for the northern delivery? The correct formulation of the question: how to make the allocated money not plundered? ”

To this letter, Olga Evgenievna, I would like to join the epigraph used by M.A. Bulgakov in Master and Margarita. Also from Faust: "I am a part of the power that always wants evil and always makes good."

Alas, this Goethe definition does not apply to the Presidential Administration. Nothing demonic in the forever wanting evil and to make stupidity (or nobility) instead of the good of the good.

Thank you for the materials provided @joker8ru