
The Investigative Committee sent a request to the Prosecutor General’s Office about the deprivation of the chairman of the Duma Media Committee of Alexei Mitrofanov deputy inviolability for a call for interrogation in the fraud case, perfect in his presence. This was reported by Izvestia. Within two weeks, the supervisory authority must make an appropriate submission to the State Duma, after which the question of the deprivation of Mitrofanov immunity will be put on the vote.
So far, Mitrofanov has the status of a witness in this matter . Earlier, he stated that he was not familiar with the bailiff accused in the case, Rashid Sautiev (in the publication of Izvestia - Radish Susotiev) and Alexander Dereshchikov and had nothing to do with the crime. Meanwhile, Izvestia is called Dereshchikov as an assistant to Mitrofanov.
The case against Sautiev, Zereshchikov and unidentified persons was discovered in May 2012 at the request of the former co-founder of Aktur-Stroy, Vyacheslav Zharov. Zharov decided to get out of the business and through the Moscow Arbitration Court achieved the return of half a share in the authorized capital of the company. However, the new leadership of the company, as well as its creditor - Gazprombank, tried to challenge this decision in the ninth arbitration court.
During the proceedings of the Sautiyevs and Warfets, Jarov was suggested to ensure the outcome of the case for 200 thousand dollars favorable for him. As Kommersant wrote earlier, negotiations were held from March to May 2012 in the presence of Mitrofanov. The deputy himself did not participate in them, but as if he made it clear that he guarantees success.
In the future, however, Zharov suspected the catch and filed an application with the police. When transferring the first tranche in the amount of 2.25 million rubles, held on May 12, 2012 at the Renaissance Hotel, Sautiev and Winchs were taken red -handed. Mitrofanov was sitting at the next table. He was not detained, because he presented the deputy mandate.
In August 2013, Sautiev was found guilty under Part 3 of Article 30, part 1 of Article 159 of the Criminal Code (attempted fraud on a particularly large amount in an organized group) and was sentenced to three years of a general regime with a fine of 500 thousand rubles. In the same month, two years in the colony received the village. He fully pleaded guilty, and his business was listened in a special order.
Meanwhile, Kommersant wrote that two cases were instituted on this episode and did not exclude that it was Mitrofanov who could become suspects in the second case.