Ukraine: Why?

The paved square in front of the Dynamo stadium on Grushevsky Street - a gate to the center of Ukrainian authorities - drives crazy. There is no sense in smoke, because of the broken light-school grenades, it is not heard of each other, in masks it is difficult to breathe and there are no faces, under flying cobblestones-it’s scary. Here for the first time in many years of Ukrainian history, people with citizens died in a clash of citizens. It is completely impossible to understand here: why in the city where baptism took place, the pre -Christian instincts came out and lead with might and main? How did some get to the point that they throw a burning mixture in others, and they shoot, stun, beat in response? I would like to leave here, from this artificial border, and think. Calming, let's start.

The current popular uprising in Ukraine has a number of internal reasons. The first is social. Viktor Yanukovych became president in 2010. For four years, power has achieved fantastic successes. For the first time in the history of independent Ukraine, they managed to impose a tribute to small and medium-sized businesses, create a strong financial and corruption clan, which everyone calls the “family”, put in their key positions and deposit strangers or lead to a compromise destructive personality. From this, millions of residents of the country have reached complete social despair. Not the regions were desperate, people were desperate. In Donetsk, Lviv, Odessa, Kyiv. Throughout the country - humiliated by anxiety for the financial future, deprived of hope. Ukrainians are a very zealous people, for the most part, for the most part on conservative values: house, family, children, wealth. Having violated the unspoken rule - not to take away the latter, the current Ukrainian authorities encroached on the holy one. Therefore, this uprising is social.

Tymoshenko was sent to the past, hung a portrait of a woman with a scythe on a Maidan Christmas tree, like a toy. Forgot.

The second reason is in politics. Political freedoms in Ukraine are the subject of household culture. In this country, people are interested in politics, know the news, monitor events, argue and openly declare their position. It was all 23 years of independence, and even before, perhaps. For some time, a heightened political feeling dulled. The five -year -old democratic freemen, which began with the “Orange Revolution”, played an evil joke - citizens were tired of democracy, journalists were accustomed to freedom of speech, many went into their worries, dismissed boring disputes and discussions. This mood was especially felt on the eve of the 2010 election, when Viktor Yanukovych won. He managed to mobilize his electorate, revenge in 2004 took. Technologies, manipulations, TV and fear of a big business to be under the charismatic, impulsive President Tymoshenko helped Yanukovych. “With a strong opposition, he will not be started, Tymoshenko will not let him go into the dictatorship,” many thought. Mistaken. First of all, he dealt with the opposition, planted the main political opponent, which no one allowed himself before Yanukovych in this soft country. Such a radical solution to the issue is explained by the deep fear of Yanukovych. She, Tymoshenko, is the death of Viktor Fedorovich Koshcheeva. That is why his main victory in the current protest is the complete absence of a prisoner in public space. Who is not in it: right -wing radicals, Klitschko, tires, bullets, Senator McCain, but Tymoshenko - not. She was sent to the past, hung a portrait of a woman with a scythe on the Maidan Christmas tree, like a toy. Forgot, not time, then. This oblivion comforts Yanukovych. In the logic of his actions, all of them - policies disagreeing with him - passed Tymoshenko, which means that they will surrender to each other. For me in this oblivion, the moral inferiority of the Ukrainian opposition.

Having violated the unspoken rule - not to take away the latter, the current Ukrainian authorities encroached on the holy one.

I remember how, at the first opening of the opposition to the opposition with Yanukovych, not one of the three protest leaders asked him about her. And did not ask correctly. Get free, the three leaders will become a harness on which the ex-prime minister from Kharkov will go straight to the Maidan. We are now observing the powerlessness of the opposition in the most elegant forms. So they swallowed the breakdown of the association with Europe, for which they stood a mountain and promised to overthrow the power. Here the parliament votes with his hands, deceitfully, undiscoveredly violating all the written norms of parliamentarism, for the laws that turn the country into a specially protected area. Shouted, and that’s it. The confrontation went into violence - there are conversations to talk to Yanukovych. It was the opposition inadequate answers to the inadequate behavior of the authorities that provoked a radical protest sector, and everyone seems to have already disappointed. Yanukovych turned Ukrainian policies from a cheerful fair into the kingdom of crooked mirrors. Who finances Klitschko? Why was the tractic allowed to become a parliamentary politician and put it on all controlled channels until the very last moment? Why does Tymoshenko Yatsenyuk say about Tymoshenko day and night? What are they talking about with Yanukovych without cameras for hours? Secrets give rise to distrust. Multipled by the very social despair, this distrust of everyone towards everyone gives an unprecedented political protest.

Now about the causes of external. The accumulated anger and the insisted resentment of the Ukrainians resulted in a street protest after the geopolitical scam of Viktor Fedorovich. Now it’s even difficult to imagine what role the history of the President of Ukraine has cooked for this. Paradoxical, large -scale. It was he who, having signed an agreement on the association with Europe, could lead the country from multi -vector, inappropriate against the backdrop of the growing ambitions of Russia. How timely it was-let the spiritualists Putin and his mystics accounts judge. The choice was. Even in the east of the country, both large business and politicians spoke for Europe. The ministers and deputies from the Yanukovych team with the conviction of incorrigible Eurooptimists spoke of imminent changes and blessings, which Europe will bring in the future. But our hero was not thinking about choosing, but about the elections.

Ukraine will recover - Russia will begin to heal.

In 2015, Yanukovych physically needs to remain in power. If this does not happen, the consequences can be the most unpredictable: from prison to wandering, according to the countries of the neighboring countries, ready to accept the countries. None of the European politicians could give him guarantees of the second period. Putin gave. Money, consultants, propaganda - here they are, imperialist gifts of the Magi. And with gifts in Moscow did not stint.

The game in the geopolitical monopoly of Vladimir Putin was always visible on the example of Ukraine. If Koshcheev’s death of Yanukovych lies in the phenomenon of Tymoshenko, then the cherished egg of the imperial idea of ​​Putin is Ukraine. Therefore, the singer of the idea of ​​DM is so preoccupied with these events. Kiselev, therefore (such rumors go) the vizier of the Surkov is supervised by Ukraine. Their efforts, presenting Yanukovych Nadezhda for a second term, Putin received the desired one: the Russian fleet will be here for a long time, the ships will begin to build soon, the atom and gas for Russia are actually fixed.

But grandiose plans, as often happens with continental plans, interfere with human causes, private. Not everyone wants to share the ideas of the new greatness of Russia in Ukraine. To be the second, to be younger, to be a means in a large and alien struggle. Why, why? The most acute thing is a sense of contradiction in young Ukrainians. They, born after 1991, reflections on the topic “Ukraine is not a country, but a means of promoting Russia to the West” at all cannot be understood. It turns out that they were born in artificial territorial education, which means that there is no homeland, there is no land. This feeling, I'm afraid, is completely incomprehensible in Russian political Babylon. There for a long time there are only scrapers and longing for the sovereign. That is why Russian neo -imperialism is so angry with the bristled Ukraine, which is why they scare fascism and Ukrainian madness on the TV. That is why they try to divide Ukrainians into Western agents and patriots for friendship with Russia. But all in vain. This country is really sick now. A weak immunity inside and an tenacious infection from the outside brought it to the heat and sore throat. And let this heat now seem unbearable, let the smiling face be haggard. But she will definitely get better. Ukraine will recover - Russia will begin to heal.