Translated material
Field of scolding on the screen
Battle for Ukraine on Russian TV channels
In the battle for Ukraine, politicians and diplomats of Russia went into the shadow; Political scientists and showmen got down to business
At the first, in the studio of "Politics" - the wall on the wall
The first to attack was Peter Tolstoy on the first. And further on the list: Vladimir Soloviev, Alexei Pushkov, Dmitry Kiselev, Soloviev, Arkady Mamontov again, again Tolstoy.
Thoughtful experts, looking from Moscow to Kyiv, are wondering: "Is this a war?"
Thoughtful experts from Kyiv respond to colleagues who is so, who is this.
But what happens on the federal television channels of Russia in the current show “Politics”, “Duel”, “Sunday evening”, you can’t call a war differently-war. Whatever television program on the Ukrainian theme, the Maidan.
Disposition
For two weeks, as the Russia 1 TV channel switched to martial law. In this connection, the gate grid was reversed. Firstly, Mamontov with his “Special correspondent” moved from Tuesday to Monday and immediately advanced to the front line (at 21.00), an extinguishing a series from the evening prime. Secondly, from Tuesday to Thursday, and again, the exemptions of Vladimir Solovyov were promised in Prime.
It seems that there is an information, sacred war.
Here is a characteristic disposition for a television Maidan.
In the studio of "Politics" - two barricades, two arcs: one against the other with convex sides. On both sides are procedural opponents. Between them the important person of the Channel One is a citizen Petr Tolstoy. On the side of the handle is Alexander Gordon, who is a clot of intelligence and who seems to be the position of an outside observer.
In the beginning-a brisk cut of chronic frames from Kyiv: fire, black mock swimming smoke, rows of police officers, paving slabs as a cobblestone, packet people bristled with plastic and iron ... All this is flickering under a frantic battle of drums.
And in the studio instantly begins. "Why are sabotage groups so professional?" - Dorenko bars. He answered: "This is a hundred percent lie ..."
It is very difficult to keep track of the arguments of the warring parties: “... you can’t lie like this (applause) ... - And you don’t bite (applause) ... - You prepared saboteurs for two months ... - And if you, gentlemen, puresticks ... (applause) ... - And you endure complete nonsense (applause) ... - Diversants where came from? Where did saboteurs come from? - We need a compromise ... - What is a compromise? - And Clinton said: “We lie with bones ...” - cross, communist ... - You are a minority, like homosexuals in Europe (applause) ... - We are not at a rally ... - I am a person ... "
That the person who is trying to shout each other.
- Let's take turns - this is the leader’s prayer.
In the end, Tolstoy lost control of the participants in this meaningful discussion, just as it happened with the authorities and the opposition on the streets and squares of Kyiv. Mutual insults. One of the participants in the television Maidan demanded an apology from the other participant and ran into an insult. Persons of political scientists have a gap.
The fireworks, firecrackers and burning tires did not reach. But the debate in the show "Politics" - flowers. We could try the berries in the “duel”.
"
Sharikovo-Shvonder reflexes in all these current shows would have been enough for the series "Dog heart"
"
Washing hands in front of the show
I like the cleanliness of the host of this show Vladimir Solovyov. She is at the gesture level. In the screensaver to the show, the presenter folds the palms of his hands and imitates their washing. And then he opens his palms and holds them out to us so that we are convinced how clean they are.
The format of the "fight" seems to imply equality of the parties in the presentation of positions. In fact, the barely presenter notes that the representative of the liberal public is gaining glasses, so he immediately interrupts him and transfers the conversation to another topic.
-What, what? Power should enter the dialogue? Who should she enter into dialogue with? With the Bandera, who say: will we kill Jews, Russians and Poles? There will definitely be no dialogue with me. I am Jewish.
This is a personal feature of the polemicist Solovyov. This is an argument. And then again op. Again, the prayers, this time Solovyov, observe the queue of those who want to shout.
The same thing happened at the Sunday evening, where the opponents are placed in the stands. Well, it would have been completely wild if Mamontov was different on the Mamontov show. Here is the quadrature of the circle - the circle of like -minded people in the square of the unanimous.
Arkady Mamontov entered the prime time "Russia 1"
From Kyiv - Buzina, from Moscow - Bortko
On January 28, when the prime minister of the Ukrainian government, Azarov resigned, and Rada canceled the laws adopted by her earlier, called the opposition “Dragon”, the special issue of Sunday evening turned out to be especially evil. It was evident that the participants were upset and annoyed by Yanukovych's concessions. The writer from Kyiv by the name of Buzin was furious, which for some reason he turned towards Russia. He threatened her with a collapse, a civil war, if she ...
If she - what?
The answer was meant: if it does not help another tranche and a limited contingent of Russian special forces.
From the lips of film director Vladimir Borto, the answer was a slightly different. He invited his Ukrainian like -minded people to mobilize Eastern Ukraine to fight the Fifth Column. “And most importantly,” the director of the “dog’s heart” recommended, “not to be afraid of cruelty.” That is, to untie the civil war?
He also advised something to the Russian government. In particular, pay attention to the Russian “Fifth Column”, “ahead of which is“ rain ”.
The man with advice was late. Everyone who should be paid attention to. And for a long time. The “fifth column” is judged, and the “rain” TV channel is poisoned and shrew.
The famous film director Bortko, as far as I recall, was directed against Schwonder and Sharikov. And then he himself acted in the role of either Schwonder or Sharikov. And even both, separately and taken together. In general, the ball-shwonder reflexes in all these talk shows would have been enough for the series “Dog heart”.
The culmination of the showdown with Ukraine was the performance of Mr. Zhirinovsky. The audience was prudently brought out of the studio, as well as the faint of heart experts, and the Vice Speaker of the Duma made a speech performed by contempt for all peoples and states, including not least to the Ukrainian state and its people.
Who grabbed the hat
The Ukrainian plot is still far from the end, but the meaning of the broken television battle for Ukraine is already clear to the bottom.
It is clear that fraternal feelings have nothing to do with it. The subtext was discovered almost immediately, as soon as at one of the first talk shows, Gennady Gudkov spoke about the root cause of the riots in Kyiv. As soon as he said that the reason for the inadequacy of political power in Ukraine, in its isolation from the people, in its arrogance, as his opponent Dmitry Kiselev on Russia 1 rushed to talk about the famous merits of Vladimir Putin. That is, grabbed the hat.
The mode also grabbed the hat and gave the command of the television machine to open fire from the federal channels, which was immediately done.