
Russia's officials are looking for more and more excuses for the anti -Sirot law prohibiting the adoption of Russian children by US citizens. The other day, the chairman of the Investigative Committee, Alexander Bastrykin, brought another murderous argument. It turns out that American adoptive parents are racists.
“They do not adopt their children,” Bastrykin said , “because these are the blacks basically. They do not want to take quietly into their families.”
Therefore, they say, the Americans are loaded on Russian orphans - because those with them are a white race.
According to the chairman of the Investigative Committee, there are about 130 thousand such unwanted black children in the United States.
The argument is not new. A year ago, he was operated on by the magazine "Expert". “Firstly, 60% of children in American orphanages are not children with white skin ... - his editorial article said in support of the anti -Sirot law.“ Hence the interest in Russia, because our country, along with Ukraine, is the main supplier of small white -skinned children. ”
Then I answered the "expert" with statistics in my hands. Now I have more fresh data, and this makes it possible to trace the dynamics of interracial adoptions.
The adoption of a child with a family of another race is by no means uncommon in the United States. It is enough to recall the many children's mother Angelina Jolie, who has six children, of which three are the adopted - Cambodian, Vietnamese and Ethiopian. It is believed that Zakhara’s adoption contributed to the interest of the adoptive parents in Ethiopia - the number of adoptions from this country doubled by the Americans.
Among international adoptions, interracial adoptions are 84 percent, within the country - 40 percent. The proportion of African -Americans among children adopted inside the country is 23 percent. This is despite the fact that African Americans make up 14 percent of the US population. The number of African Americans adopted by white parents is growing: 15 years ago there were 15 percent. This is the data of the Ministry of Health and Social Services of the United States.
The increase in the number of interracial adoptions stimulated two laws adopted by Congress in 1994 and 1996. These laws prohibit agencies to adopt racial and ethnic discrimination of both children and adoptive parents.
Now let's see how many and what American children are waiting for the queue for adoption. On September 30, 2012 (on this day the financial year ends in the United States), all such children were 397,122. This is less than in any previous year. Children are waiting for their fate not in the orphanage (they are simply not in the USA), but in foster families. The waiting period lasts an average of 13.1 months, and 22 percent of children will be waiting from 1 to 5 months (a year earlier - respectively, 13.5 and 21 percent).
Among children awaiting adoption, most white are 42 percent. Black is 26 percent. In the previous year, the former was 41 percent, the second - 27. The dynamics are positive for African Americans. 26 percent is 101,915 people. Where did Bastrykin get 130 thousand - God news. This figure is mobile: for the 2012 budget year, out of 251,764 children received under the guardianship of the state, 240,923 children were adopted.
Among the angry Filippic Bastrykin there is an accusation of trading by children adopted from Russia: "You know this story, when children were thrown from the site to the site. Through the sites they sell cats and dogs that are tired of, and there they have such a site for children." We are talking about the investigation of Reuters, the results of which were published in September last year. It tells several stories of adoptive children, from whom the adoptive parents refused, but did not turn to the guardianship authorities, but found other families through the Internet who wanted to adopt the child. Although the Investigative Committee opened the case under Article 127.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (people trafficking), there are no assumptions in the investigation that the children were sold: the new adoptive parents made out guardianship, and they, on the contrary, benefited in the form of tax benefits. A total of 26 such cases were revealed, including with three children from Russia. All children are now adults - presumably, vicious practice has remained in the past.
But fresh Russian data on secondary orphan. Of the 6.5 thousand children adopted in 2012, 4.5 thousand were returned to orphanages.
I do not presume to say how the author of the notes does, that the main reason for secondary orphanage is the allowance due for adoption. Most adoptions are related in nature: stepfather is adopted by a stepson, a grandmother and grandfather - a granddaughter left without parents (most often deprived of parental rights). The stepfather is divorced with the mother of the child and cancel their paternity, the grandfather dies, and it is difficult to raise a child to her grandmother - that’s the refusal.
And finally, about the cruelty of the adoptive parents. The State Duma on the family has just recommended that the bill introduced by the deputies of the Kemerovo region on the complete ban on international adoption. Olga Batalin's first deputy chairman Olga Batalin stated the reason for this decision with bribing frankness: according to her, only Americans are distinguished by pathological cruelty to adoptive children, and now Russian children are not given to them.
However, let's see what is happening in Russia. Information on this topic is published on the website of the Investigative Committee itself. Last year, 205 orphans were recognized as victims of criminal cases in the production of the TFR. The crimes, primarily in relation to the sexual integrity of the children, were committed by adoptive parents, guardians, trustees, their cohabitants or members of their family. It is not uncommon for children to be transmitted to persons repeatedly convicted, including for crimes against the individual, that is, killers and rapists.
Not further than a month ago, Alexander Bastrykin himself spoke of this. He cited the general statistics of crime against children:
The investigating authorities of the Investigative Committee for 9 months of 2013 investigated about 13 thousand (12,767) crimes committed against minors, which is 24.2% more than in the same period of 2012 (10,277). Of these, 392 killings (13.6% more), over 1.2 thousand rape (55.5% more), and 3.25 thousand facts of violent acts of sexual nature (80.3% more).
What is done to combat this evil? But what:
*The federal law in question establishes, in particular, the dependence of the duration of the interrogation of a minor victim or a witness from his age. So, if the child is not seven years old, investigative actions with his participation cannot continue without a break for more than 30 minutes. In addition, the law provides for the right of a minor victim, in respect of whom a crime was committed against sexual integrity, a lawyer. The costs of labor paying such a defender will be compensated at the expense of the federal budget.
Criminal liability has been introduced for the illegal distribution of information in the media indicating the identity of the minor victim, or information about the suffering received by him.*
As you can see, there is no question of the prevention of crimes against children - the head of the powerful department speaks only of the rights of the victim. If the child, of course, survived.
No matter how banal the link to Krylov’s fable about the monkey and the mirror, she is the place here.