The ax in the air

From the entire tin curlyness of the presidential speech in the St. George Hall, from this verbal chemical curl, indicating that the poorly fortified Kremlin ceilings flowed to the conditional Prokhanov, many decisively cut the bizarre phrase "National Distributes", which was clearly borrowed from the times of my childhood.

No, frankly, from another dictionary - about the one against which my father and millions of others fought, those who “thank you for the victory” and supposedly in memory of whom our unconscious freaks attach striped ribbons on themselves.

Who talked about criminal liability for attempts to rehabilitate Nazism, do not remind you? Or in their understanding, this very "rehabilitation" means doubt about the divine origin of the next sovereign?

No, in vain they think so. Because there are still people who are firmly aware of what Nazism is, and this is firm knowledge by any deputy thieves tantrums in the proven style “Hold me four” no one can shake.

If the first person of the state allows itself, to put it mildly, legally vulnerable, although spectacular statements in their own way, is it the right to expect something decent from those who smaller?

But what is the legal qualification of the free term "National Passner"? And how does this definition correlate with the text of our constitution, which, as far as I know, no one has yet canceled, at least officially?

"Betrayal" is a word in general in the perception of even my generation, not to mention the subsequent, quite comic, parody, borrowed from antediluvian Soviet books and films. It was widely used in my childhood, when one of the guys promised another to change stamps with him, and instead changed with someone else, or promised to give one to play a new water gun, and instead gave him to play another. In such cases, the offended called his friend a traitor. And correctly, by the way, called. Sometimes she could say that a girl he had abandoned about her boyfriend.

But at, so to speak, the state level ... But so that the president of the country, claiming a noticeable place in international affairs, calls for their own fellow citizens, all the "betrayal" of which consists only in the fact that they have the audacity to have an opinion different from the boss, and this opinion is sometimes publicly expressed.

A more calm synonym for the loud and sinister word "betrayal" is infidelity. Inappropriation of the oath, the oath, this word, own beliefs, friendship, woman, man.

But who, interestingly, of the alleged traitors swore allegiance to the president, FSB, the State Duma, the Russian Duma, the Russia 1 television channel and personally to the propagandist Kiselev? I don't know such people.

So who and what do these "traitors" betray? If we distract from the painful historical associations related to the term “national traitors” (although you are distracting from them), we can assume that we are talking about the betrayal of “national interests”.

What is it, sorry, this is? Has anyone formulated these same interests in more or less legally correct categories? And can any national interests be in a normal modern state other than the interests of individual law-abiding citizens and various (emphasizing, various) social groups, their freedom, dignity and security?

And what is in this case the "fifth column"? I always believed that the fifth column is customary to call citizens of the warring state engaged in subversive activities in favor of the enemy. And now let them answer such a question. Is our country at the moment is at war with any other state? If so, why is it not officially announced about this? If so, why are such states in the lips of the first persons of our state are not called opponents, but "our partners"? What kind of fifth and tenth columns? This is about what?

However, I mean about what. About to teach one part of citizens to another. About the atmosphere of intolerance, suspicion and hatred in society, already so dense, is so thick that in this atmosphere you can easily hang axes. About the fact that only in such an atmosphere of "they" can feel calm and free. In the normal atmosphere, they themselves, even without much intervention of the mythical fifth column, would dissolve, like ghosts before dawn.

So the question of who is national traitors is open. However, not so open.