On April 22, the Federal Penitentiary Service stated that it would conduct an audit on the fact of a possible violation by oppositionist Alexei Navalny conditions for serving house arrest due to publication in his blog 
Alexey Navalny (left) and his lawyer Vadim Kobzev near the building of the Grandmother's Court on April 22, 2014
Navalny published on social networks a statement regarding the criminal case, in which he goes as an accused. Navalny said that he was violating the conditions of house arrest in order to comment on the case of Yves Rocher, according to which, together with his brother, Oleg was accused of fraud and legalization of funds. In his appeal, Navalny insists on his innocence and submits documents from the criminal case, according to which the company "Yves Rocher" after the examination concludes that there is no damage from the actions of the accused. This, according to Navalny, is evidenced by the following fragments of the case:
Navalny’s lawyer Olga Mikhailova, in a conversation with The New Times, said that she intends to file a petition to terminate the criminal case to the Prosecutor General.
“I don’t know what I can do in court. I don’t know a stronger argument in favor of my innocence and Oleg than a letter from the victim, that he is not a victim,” Navalny wrote in social networks, speaking of a possible change in preventive measure if the Federal Penitentiary Service considers publication by violation of house arrest.
See the original material at http://www.interfax.ru/russia/373046
See the original material at http://www.interfax.ru/russia/373046
See the original material at http://www.interfax.ru/russia/3730