"It is disgusting just stupidly laugh"

The period came when it became disgusting simply stupidly laugh. Therefore, I now cannot imagine myself a leading humorous program, where rzhak is for the sake of rzaki. What is happening on television now, I am not enough, but what it does with the mass viewer is a disaster. As, for example, the children's audience was “killed”, how they stopped showing programs about normal human values ​​- family, relationships of children and parents. Television completely forgot about its educating role, forgot what should be brought up by no one right now - to teach and show what to strive for. Therefore, what is now doing television is a terrible sin.

Unfortunately, the current humorous transmissions do not carry any semantic load. If you watch a movie, after watching you can agree with the author or not. If this is “the funniest movie”, then you just have a fun time and go out with nothing. Naturally, humorous programs are now needed in order not only to relieve tension, but in general, to make a person not think about anything. Forget everything and stupidly eat and laugh. This is the same, it seems to me, is not a very correct goal that television is now pursuing.

Smart laughter is already a satire, and there is no satire on our television and cannot be. Forbidden.

At some point, the comedian I want to say more and joke more acutely. But this does not work. The bar is clearly visible, which is periodically the same Ivan Urgant, and I feel it. Ivan can say what he can, but not what he wants, probably. And it seems to me that it is clear where the ears, arms and legs stick out from, why you did not speak to the end. Therefore, a low bow to Ivan Urgant because he at least ironizes what he says and over himself.

What is doing television now is a terrible sin.

Of course, a joke to a large audience and a small one is different. There are a lot of jokes with which we exchange in a narrow circle, up to black humor. Everyone around is laughing, but then they say: no, it is impossible from the stage. Before you take out a joke into the Great Hall, you think. This level of self -censorship is also very jumping for everyone. But the bar is very high now, because no one wants any problems. So the internal self -censorship turns into external censorship.

Now there are few or there are no political jokes at all - also because they do not give us particularly reasons: everything is so gray. A joke is a flash, it is a bright color, a parody of life, and gray, which does not manage itself, is very difficult to spoil. Nervous laughter is not a very positive reaction. This is such a slight horror, it does not have a real laugh when you are really funny. He has some other nature. Nervous laughter is like a nervous tick approximately or stuttering.

Now it’s not funny, because Paphos reigns. Paphos is a concealment of emptiness, it is dust in the eyes. In public life, inseparable from political, this has become the norm - covering the void invented by new forms that do not exist. Classic "naked king." It is clear that laughter destroys these soap bubbles. Another thing is that we are all now switching to the Aesopes Language and reading between the lines, because the reaction is so strong that they are afraid of everything. The background is now the same as in the good old Soviet times: it is better not to stick out, and if you stick out, you will definitely get a hat. And if you still stick out, then somehow with understanding. As, for example, “television on the knee” appeared - and it was stalled, because it is a big responsibility now - so frantic and frankly joke. In addition, everything related to massness falls under such sights from all sides that you need to be responsible for quality. And the quality rests, even in humor, on money, because professional people make a quality product.

Trying to reach the point, you sometimes start to laugh over something, then neatly laugh and understand that here is still something wrong and it is time not to laugh, but to figure it out. There were a lot of wonderful satirists in Russia, but even if Zhvanetsky is now reading, he is no longer funny, he is sad. Maybe again, due to the fact that we all do not feel the ground under our feet, we don’t know what will happen tomorrow, laws do not work for us, there is no justice and you are not responsible for your life. This uncertainty in tomorrow was absolutely not in Soviet times. Everything was clear and everything worked, tomorrow and all life ahead were calculated. It was all wildly disgusting, but it gave us a reason to neighing us all, realizing: well, they will not put you in prison for this.

Now sometimes you have to make yourself joke and have fun. I really understand Mikhail Mikhailovich (Zhvanetsky. - Ed. ), Which also writes that everything is sad and hopeless. You are joking to maintain a certain image, so everyone is sure that I am an absolutely carefree person. On the other hand, when you are left alone with all this, and you are horrified by what is happening, you say to yourself: "Stop, we must somehow laugh at it internally." And it becomes easier. Any difficult situation as soon as you depart from your emotions and rise a little higher, you can already evaluate it and joke over it. When you can joke about the problem, this means that you are free from this problem. Self -irony also helps. Self -irony is all that we have.

This is a big responsibility now - so frantic and frankly joke.

In fact, the irony and sarcasm have replaced the animal laughter in our country, but now it is impossible to find in this to guilty. Putin or Peskov does not write orders "to ban such a joke, do not joke about it." No. It’s just that people have lost the sense of the border - what is good and what is bad; What is possible and what is impossible. It is believed that it is better not to do anything or ban everything. And these are people who make decisions - the authorities, which stands on channels, on television, on newspapers and magazines. They least of all want to worsen their situation, but do not improve it.

Not only people of the regime, but all the people of this short bright era in front of our eyes are losing self -irony and irony in relation to life. The ironic attitude allows you to rise a little over the situation or yourself, to look from above and say: "Uh, how everything is running." Many have lost the ability to self -irony, and I begin to feel it by how and what they write in blogs. People were knocked out from under their feet, and they fluctuate in everything, take a very biased position: I am against Pussy Riot or, conversely, I am for them. And this is generally an ambiguous story, but it’s easier for them to think. Everyone was embittered sharply, divided into black and white. The ironic look is more balanced: you can criticize your ideology and allegations, and this only indicates a higher level of development at which a person stands. But now this is rarely found - no one wants to criticize oneself.