To the degrees of famous

The head of Roskomnadzor, Alexander Zharov, awarded along with the state propagandists , began to strangle Runet with a vengeance - he demands to expand the grounds for instant blocking of sites. Meanwhile, the activists of the Dissernet community recalled that the dissertation of the candidate of medical sciences Zharov was written out of the state report. Andrei Zazakin answers the questions of the “faces” of Dissernet.

- Alexander Zharov defended himself on the topic "Medical and Higienic foundations of the formation of a healthy lifestyle in the Russian Federation" in 2004. At that time, he held the posts of the press secretary of the Ministry of Health and assistant minister. The then chief Zharov, Yuri Shevchenko, was his supervisor. Is it possible in this case to talk about the use of official position for personal purposes?

• I can make only assumptions here, no more or no less reasonable than any of your readers can do - so why will I replace them? In a hint, I note that the text of 50 pages of the Ministry of Health report was generated by the structural unit of the Ministry of Health, which Zharov did not obey and to which Zharov did not obey. How these 50 pages migrated to Zharov’s work - they were stained through the wall of the office, came along the corridor, or crawled from the table of the chief Zharov - I did not see, I do not dare to judge.

- What share of plagiarism did you find in the dissertation of Zharov?

• I note on the rights of the letter -eater that plagiarism is a write -off with material damage by more than 100,000 rubles, at least if we throw Ozhegov and put it in place of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. In the dissertation of Zharov, written out of 150 pages of 150. Please note - I do not claim that he wrote it off. There are simply written pages there. How did they end up there? This is unknown to us. I want to think that they were placed in a wake, since uniform people who constantly violate the legislation of the Russian Federation work in a stance, which we are constantly writing to the prosecutor's office. Not further than today the head of the department of scientific degrees Ignatiev once again violated Art. 182 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, canceling the effect on the territory of the Higher Attestation Commission on the representative by proxy, and did not allow the applicant for the meeting of the EC VAK for this reason. I strongly recommend the prosecutor’s office to take a closer look at this initiative of Mr. Ignatiev - what if he is a foreign agent completely? Togo and look there in Vake, and they will go under some foreign jurisdiction, since Ignatiev does not put Russian laws in anything. There will be, for example, the flag of Nauru or Mauritius - and goodbye, the Higher Attestation, VAK!

- 50 written off pages out of 150 - is it a lot or little in comparison with other "clients" "Dissernet"?

• I believe that even one paragraph of stolen text is an occasion for public ridicule and resignation of an official. But Zharov is not a record holder at all, in contrast, say, from the enchanting deputy Igoshin , who stole about 160 pages of a dissert of 186 and also changed the “chocolate” to “meat” using auto -cancer.

- Can we talk about the non -original work of Zharov in general?

• If there is at least one stolen paragraph in work, this is a stolen work. If you are about the scientific novelty regardless of how this new scientific result was obtained, then this is to experts in this specialty, but I do not belong to them.

- Was a substantial analysis carried out or only the identification of the written off?

• For fundamental reasons, the disserter never invades the analysis of the dissertation content. We analyze the origin of texts, not their scientific novelty.

- Is it possible to assume that the absence of media publications on this topic is associated with the current position of Zharov?

• Don't know; In the zero approximation, the general remark is true - the journalists are lazy to write anything about anyone.

- How do you have the case with the publication of the results of the examination?

• Every day, 1-2 new examinations appear on the site, which is also reported to our readers on social networks.

- Where are you going?

• This is the topic of a series of articles that I write now; God will give, not all the media will disperse you there - I’ll tell you. General: introduced by a resolution of 842, the statute of limitations amnestied all crooks that defended earlier on January 1, 2011. Therefore, we can only direct anything anywhere on recent defenses.

- How was it in the case of Zharv?

• This is 2004. Fryarov can be calm: the court is not entitled to consider the case of deprivation of the degree at all, and the Ministry of Education and Science - due to the statute of limitations. Medvedev wrote to him an unlimited indulgence.