
“Novorossia should not be pulled up to Russia, because it has many flaws and flaws itself, most of which are rooted in the period of pro-Western and ultraliberal reforms of the 90s, but to build a more Russian, more sincere, more living and organic society-fair, heroic, spiritual,” the philosopher and leader of the Eurasian movement said not so long ago Dugin.
The idea is interesting and amusing - in Russia the state of “spiritual sea” is just starting to be built, too much must be demolished, and in the Donetsk steppes it can be built immediately, without tiring preparation. Why, in fact, “New Russia” not become such a Russian field of experiments? The leadership of the DPR-Pirian Prime Minister Alexander Borodai wrote to the newspaper “Tomorrow” Alexander Prokhanov, also testifies to this, the Minister of Defense Igor Strelkov is also a supporter of national-conservative values. Where Prokhanov is, there is Dugin, near the Izborsk club, and from the Izborsky club and Putin it is not far. We add to this trinity the leader of the Russian national unity of Alexander Barkashov, who claims to be in Donetsk - that would have grown up forged forging. Not a business project, like Crimea, but selfless searches of "meanings".
Let's say right away - no experiment in Donetsk is likely to work. If only because there are more than ten ministers of the self-proclaimed republic for one conditionally identified beard and conditionally romance of Strelkov. Everything, as a selection, either functionaries of the Party of Regions, or Ukrainian officials who are well inscribed in the local system of kickbacks, cuts and contracts. They obviously do not do with ideological experiments - they did not make a revolution for that. There is another reason: it seems that the Kremlin was desperate to get a new territory and gradually not only withdrawing troops from the border, but also tries to cool the fervor of sofa Internet beards.According to the latest version , the Patriotic-Orthodox oligarch Konstantin Malofeev is financed by the Donbass militia, we must think, out of the desire to become the vice-king of New Russia, and the Kremlin, as it were, had nothing to do with it, his hands are clean: he did not lose, because he did not sit down at the table. The knights without fear and reproach went at their own request to free the land from the junta. Maybe they will turn out with them, or maybe not: now Igor Strelkov says that a resident in the Donbass is not the same, sipping beer, but does not want to go to the trench. The degree of patriotism from all this information falls greatly, as well as a degree of criticism of interference in the affairs of a stranger state. “Ah, Malofeev ugly - well, okay,” who will say with joy, and who is with quiet bitterness.
But the contours of the state of spiritual grave were visible clearly. If, for example, a couple of years ago, Alexander Dugin was known to the broad masses as an adherent of “Virtue Boroda” and “Great Kotobo” , now this is one of the main specialists in Russia on Western television channels, the desired guest of Dmitry Kiselev (although in 2007 Alexander Gelievich deliberately argued: “Putin is Dugin” ). The newspaper “Tomorrow” is the almost official press of Dmitry Rogozin, and Alexander Prokhanov is one of the main visible ideologists of the authorities is a meeting of his patriotic Izborsk club to see any governor, and who knows if the president will eventually prefer Izborsk Valdya. Theoretically, such respected people could distinguish the experimental territory.
Probably, the reason is that Dugin, nor Barkashov have a harmonious picture of society and the state, unless Dugin directly offers “abolish the oligarchy”. His “fourth political theory” consists in denying a market society and the universalism of human rights. Dugin is more difficult with a positive agenda - it is difficult to understand, for example, what should be replaced by a free market - a planned economy or natural economy. The theory of the power block is more built: the philosopher, for example, sympathizes with the oprichnina , which would be nice to revive. The ideal Duginsky state should be in a constant confrontation with the Western countries - by civilization of the sea, a stronghold of postmodern and liberalism. Apparently, therefore, the issues of its inner device are not so important and described by the philosopher mainly through denial - there should not be this and this. The rest is sketched by strokes - a fair state (and with justice not social, but divine), which can turn to the elements of communism and even fascism. Religion should be authority in this society - it is not a fact that Orthodoxy is “the ancient, the better.”
About the same thing with Prokhanov, but more precisely: “The Russian people are Stalinist, but the soul of his Christian ”, the basis of the state - monasteries and weapons, Stalin and Putin continue the affairs of the kings and emperors. North Korea can become a landmark for domestic policy, where the state, according to Prokhanov, makes each person a “giant”. The leader of this blessed world is a "superman." In one of the issues of “Tomorrow”, dedicated to the Congress of the Rodina party, there was an article under the heading “Nuclear Orthodoxy” - this term was used in all seriousness and meant a system in which the science engaged in the development of weapons and religion becomes the main thing.
Alexander Barkashov is even more precisely expressed: the monarchy is optimal for a Russian person, but the national dictatorship with an estate-national representation will also come.
The spontaneous revolutionaries of New Russia think in the same line. The Babai man calls Putin “king” , and discusses about politics as follows: “It seems to me that there will be no parties at all. Because, I think so, there will simply be people themselves. There will be one owner who will dispose of everyone. Democracy is generally ineffective. I don't want to live like that. So that some policeman, some prosecutor, some judge decided my fate. Who are they to decide my fate? Nobody".
Based on these rather scarce constructions, the state can still be founded. He heads his “superman” - preferably the king, and even better the bishop. At first, the regent with the prospect of growth, dictator, ruler, leader, father - few names will also be suitable. He issues laws and decrees, appoints and removes from his posts, gives out contracts and chooses the suppliers of the yard, executes and draws, ideally - holds worship. Around the "superman"-commissars-pinderers in camouflage, with beards, in the glasses of "Ray Ban". Sometimes they go to the terrain, and divine justice happens there. The parliament in such a state is an extra thing, and maybe even a demonic one. Either the case is the cathedral-on a national-symbol, which periodically gathers and approves important decisions of the “superman”-a trip to hostile Dnipropetrovsk or Zaporozhye.
A free market is a relic of capitalism from which you need to move away, and the ways to replace it are different. Planned state economics, surpasses - it is not for nothing that the creators of the DPR talk so much about "nationalization". You can conduct it culturally: turn all large enterprises into state corporations, small shops and workshops into trusts. Money is not the most important thing, rather the source of evil, they are well replaced by food cards.
The main cultural institutions are monasteries (exactly according to the covenants of Prokhanov). The Internet exists, but the number of sites that can be entered is limited by the newspaper Tomorrow and, for example, the Russia-3 portal. The main news, of course, from international fronts: Novorossia entered into an agreement with Uganda and Gambia, and the Anglo -Saxons tried to interfere with this. Youth movements flourish-from philosophical clubs pondering the export of national conservatism to the west and east, to street teams that follow their customs in cities and villages.
It looks like the utopia of the Renaissance or Antiopia of the XX century. Rather, it would be like. Judging by the fact that Novorossia has already been presented by the oligarch Malofeev’s project and nothing more, a degree will be reduced further. An ideal option for the completion of a beautiful myth would be the prime minister Boroday about the construction of “great kotoby” and its overthrow by the same officials from the Party of Regions. This would be another excellent proof that the Kremlin has nothing to do with it.
Author - correspondent for ID "Kommersant"