Electorate work

As you know, the most transparent presidential elections are held in Russia, where the name of the winner is known at least six months before the people come to the urns. This process is much worse organized in the West. In Europe, for example, until they consider voices, the population is lost in guesses who will rule them there. And in America, sometimes even after the elections from people, they still hide the name of the national leader for a long time. There, it happens, count the ballots, and manually, shame and shame.

In this sense, the Ukrainian elections appointed on May 25 look completely unsolvable.

Not only is the name of the winner in question and the second round is quite possible. It is not known whether these elections will take place at all. Since the head of the neighboring state for the third time in a row clearly and unconditionally withdrew his troops from the border with Ukraine, and this is a formidable sign. This is the leader. If he claims that he does not consider the issue of the accession of Crimea, then wait for a referendum. And if he allocated troops again and again, then, then, he is preparing in his own way for the will of the will. Not forgetting once again to remind the world of the "rampant neo -Nazi forces" in the country, part of which he annexed.

The main problem for him is that after the elections it will go down in the history of Kiev Hunt. And this phrase was so loved by the Russian agitprope and various kinds of Pino-edges in the southeast of Ukraine that it will not be easy to part with it. In addition, after the election of the new president, the indifferent summer will absorb the unfortunate Yanukovych and his request for the introduction of troops will lose its former force. And not that without Yanukovych the occupation will become impossible, but the process itself will be slightly complicated. And he loves comfort.

Probably, it is precisely these circumstances that the phenomenon that we observe throughout the "Russian spring" should be explained. The Commander -in -Chief of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation gives the order to remove the troops, but they do not go anywhere. That is, they are not, as in the Crimea on the eve of the referendum, but they are, and this armed group of Cheshire cats causes difficult feelings among presidential candidates, as well as voters.

Actually, therefore they look so unsolvable, future elections. This is their uniqueness. Citizens of Ukraine will vote for their candidate, as it were, in the presence of the occupation troops, who are already ruled in the Crimea and looting in Slavyansk. And if in other countries the people choose a future for themselves, without fear that the older brother hung from the urn will jump out of the urn, then in Ukraine the vote will take place on this unpredictable relative. He is visibly and invisibly present everywhere - in Donetsk, and in Lviv, and in Odessa, and in Kyiv.

Therefore, four days before the elections, we know little about the moods of voters and about the favorites of the upcoming race. They talk about Putin in Ukraine every day, as well as Strelkov with his inherent Malofeev, and the disputes around the detained journalists from the Aram Ashotych newspaper do not stop for a minute, and almost nothing is heard about Poroshenko with Tymoshenko. And it is necessary to explore Ukrainian sites for quite some time in order to detect at least some fresh sociology (34% of respondents-6.5% for the "chocolate king"-there are almost no rest). At the same time, without the slightest surprise, perceiving the fact that the main concern of Ukrainian sociologists is the “problem of achievability” and “the problem of the sincerity of respondents”.

In fact, how to interview compatriots in Crimea or in Lugansk? And if tomorrow is war, then what's the difference, who will win - Poroshenko or Tymoshenko? If there is no war, then this will essentially become the only good news, and how the former Minister of Trade from the former prime minister and political stake is fundamentally different - few people will say about that today in Ukraine. Unless Poroshenko flashed less on television, tired less, he, respectively, is lower than the anti -rating - that’s the whole difference.

True, there are rumors that the “nuclear weapon” who called on the head of Russians Julia Vladimirovna supports the secret political connection with Vladimir Vladimirovich, but it is not clear how to relate to this exclusive. On the one hand, Putin in Ukraine scares children. On the other hand, the "secret connection" - it sounds encouraging. Fear of the enemy, as Dostoevsky also remarked, replaces hatred, and if Tymoshenko manages to make his long -standing confident at least more often recall about Ukraine, then the huge thank her a lot of human thanks. And what arguments she uses at the same time, an atomic bomb or something else is worse, such as the beauty that will save the world-but is it all the same?

The war is the main plot in these elections, but it is all the more important that they take place and go through the vast majority of regions and without special incidents. There are signs that the Kremlin still will not be able to interfere with them, and the panic speeches of Strelkova-Girkin and the Babai Jewish Baba Jewish Baby. The second front , with a great delay, opened by oligarch Akhmetov against the separatists, seems to be evidence that Putin is still satisfied with the Crimea. However, even after the elections, whoever won, the situation will remain extremely dangerous for Ukraine, and this should also be explained by the joint intention of candidates and the practical absence of election battles. The winner will get a very difficult inheritance, and both favorites, perhaps, secretly shudder at the thought of victory.

Such are these elections, cannot be compared with Russian.