
We defend our order in all azimouth. We fight back from homosexuals and bearded women (before, by the way, they were shown at fairs and the people looked without any damage to spirituality - but that earlier). We collect the Russian world and soon we will build a base on the moon with the prayers of Rogozin in order to threaten not only the Swede. We introduce Cheburashka instead of the Internet and Medinsky instead of culture.
And for all this, laws are adopted - one another is brilliant. Part is frankly cannibalnic, part is just ridiculous. At first it was forbidden to do, now to speak.
The law forbids to call executioners executioners, genocide genocide. No, it’s possible about Germany so far, it is impossible about the USSRThe latter in this series is the law on criminal liability for the rehabilitation of Nazism. This, not so that they do not praise Hitler, do not go with the swastika and do not throw Zigi. Exactly the opposite. The law forbids to call executioners executioners, genocide genocide. No, it’s possible about Germany so far, about the USSR. It is impossible to talk about the crimes of the NKVD and about the responsibility of Stalin for the unleashing of the war, about the hopeless executions and about the peoples. All this is now called - I quote - "the spread of false information about the actions of the USSR during the Second World War," and for this - up to five years.
The law is designed to shut up the mouth to those who, like me, consider Comrade Stalin a ghoul, and concentration camps - concentration camps, regardless of what form the guards were worn and in what language spoke. But this is not only the protection of the picture of the past that Yarovaya and her colleagues in the Duma want to introduce - this is an attack on the present. It is supposed to plug the mouth just to those people who do not accept not only Stalin - with this, the authors of the law, reluctantly, reconciled, but also that permanent ideological and propaganda nightmare in which we now live.
I can not help but feel personal responsibility for this law. A year ago, I compared SS and SMERSH - then in the Duma (and not only) the hysteria began, and this is one of its results. So, I cannot limit myself to just an expression of my attitude-I must do something.
So, it never occurred to me nothing but to publicly break it, i.e. It is forbidden to declare exactly the fact that now, after the law comes into force, it is forbidden to declare. I am doing this so that the organs initiate a criminal case - then there will be an open process. In the verdict, of course, I have no doubt - I am guilty - but, in fact, this will be the first process over the Stalinist practices of the war. Well, if they don’t excite, this will be a recognition that this law and many others, adopted recently, nothing more than political blackmail.
So, I declare:
The punitive bodies of Stalin, in particular, the NKVD and SMERSH of the NKVD, during the Second World War (deliberately mention only the period to which the new law applies) committed crimes similar to which were recognized as the criminal SS and Gestapo by the decision of the Nuremberg Tribunal. In particular, they carried out acts of the genocide of the peoples of the USSR, used torture, without trial and investigation on a mass scale killed and repressed innocent. The performers of these crimes were not only not punished, but, on the contrary, they were awarded. Consequently, these actions cannot be considered excesses of war, and the responsibility for them should be entrusted not only by the executioners themselves, but also to their commanders, up to the Supreme Commander -in -Chief, as well as the state as a whole in those years in those years. I believe that by the aggregate of them committed to the above -mentioned structures should be treated as criminal organizations.
It is clear that they will say that I deny the victory, praise Hitler, denigrate the fighters of the NKVD who died on the battlefield, etc. Any normal person understands that there is nothing like this in my words. And there is a rejection of hypocrisy and lies, both in the past and today.
The move is behind them.
Opinions expressed under the heading "Law" may not reflect the point of view of the editorial office