“Why does the professor limit himself to unfounded accusations of “disinformation”, without trying to somehow challenge specific examples of how the results of his work were used in the ministerial text?
If I had not known the professor personally (for some time I worked as deputy director at the same institute of art history, where Professor Rubinstein remains the head of the cultural policy department), I would have been afraid that the respected scientist wrote his post in a state of temporary memory loss.
But I know that the professor’s memory does not fail. Why is he trying to deny the obvious?"