The first in hell

This story has a long echo, inconsolable piercing howl. Although it is time to get used to it, and in the framework of an impartial expert analysis, it is simply to state that the current Russian agitprop cannot function otherwise. And only by the descending one, plunging into a fiery hell, and it remains only to guess what they will tell us further, after all this . Yarosh was already won in the Ukrainian elections, American helicopters hung over the Dnieper, the corpses of the militia sold the State Department to the organs, the child was cut off - this is not the limit, right?

Yes, but it is still important to understand what it was on the first television channel. Avoiding gross moral assessments as possible, but trying to figure out what is happening. A simple conspiracy version suggests itself. First, three days before Konstantin Ernst, about the "escalation of the genocide" in Slavyansk was informed by our glorified philosopher Dugin , and the bosses in Moscow made a stand. Then the head of the Southern Bureau received an editorial task: to find a witness and expose the atrocities of the punishers. I had to look for a long time, but whoever wants to-he will achieve, and in the frame, after two or three rehearsals, Galina Pyshnyak appeared. Lightly diverging in details, she essentially correctly retold everything that the world learned from the philosopher.

That is, there is a pure "Goebbels", a talented, as we heard, man, the plot was originally staged, in war as in war, and many will be awarded, you will see. And in case the enemy-mahists who watch the Kremlin television channels with Russophobic purposes will come to Slavyansk and expose a lie, the presenter lunged straws. “The conversation with Galina left a difficult feeling,” he said, anticipating a report. “The heart does not believe that this is generally possible.”

The heart does not believe, and the microphone works, yes.

However, another explanation that seems to me more realistic. With Dugin, who recently in vain calls for the introduction of troops and kill Ukrainians, annoying the commander in chief, almost not connected. Everything could be easier and in its own way worse.

Julia Chumakova went to Slavyansk. I accidentally met with a crazy unhappy refugee, the wife of the Berkutovts, who told her about the "creatures", who "raped and killed children." Now imagine that you are a Channel One correspondent, and even a head of the head who got such an exclusive.

You can not believe the interlocutor for a penny, but you can’t fail to give the material on the air. Because you are afraid not to believe. Because her wild narrative is too coincided with those attitudes that were obtained back in November, and in blogs they write about Ukrainian SS-animals. Like him, Dugin wrote, but he is a professor. Because she, this Galina, will go and tell someone her merciless truth, and you, who will be good for the non-renewal of truth. In short, the catastrophe, and Chumakova writes the story of the refugee, stupidly repeating the same question “isn’t you scared?”, And rests the recording to Moscow, where they are also afraid to hide the secret of the crucifixion of the Slavic baby from the people and superiors.

Now they expect apologies from Ernst, and the most beautiful -hearted of their colleagues are suffering from Konstantin, who still, imagine, managed to "do not let down, do not go into the category of despised." He will soon return from his vacation and, horrified by the deed, pushes and even "reprimand someone." He will call this Chumakov to the carpet, he will not give his hands, say "how you are not ashamed, girl!" It is sinful to laugh at this, and to suffer, guessing, which Ernst favorably differs from Kulistikov, Dobroduev and the working dynasty of the Gabrelyanovs. As well as wait for apologies.

You should be expected, I repeat, only new plots under the heading "More Ada".

For the state -forming media in the Putin era became not only a collective organizer and accountizer, but also the generator of the right, useful rumors. Previously, this was done by the KGB, who was not alien to the current president, introducing information into the consciousness of citizens about, for example, that the Moscow metro was blown up by the law enforcement officers, or about the secret Jew Solzhenitsyn, who served the Germans during the war. The newspapers did not print this, and did not say on TV either. Together with the beautiful songs of Pakhmutova, the lies of solid, verbose, elegant prevailed. The lies that called on the road, and not hang in a loop.

In the era of the Internet and the sovereign Putin’s freedom, the concept has changed, and not the letter, but the figure triumph. The fact that the Bandera created in Slavyansk, learned tens of millions. About who Galina Pyshnyak is about how the inhabitants of Slavyansk commented on her story - it is good if hundreds of thousands. So decide whether Ernst needs to apologize and what will happen to him if he upset so many of his faithful viewers. If he sows doubts about the soul of the Cathedral Putin's majority. If he dares to criticize Chumakov.

This story has a long echo, but it is gradually calming down to change some fresh stunning news. Hell is a place where the TV is turned on, and our correspondent, wide open his eyes and trembling in advance, asks the following question.