The ghost of Eurasia

1.

The next “Western” period of Russian history ended. Regular student years in the history of Russia are needed; This is the time of re -equipment and accumulation of capital. Then follows the war with the West.

Yesterday they talked about the "pan -European house"; They wrote that Russia is a European power, and by a misunderstanding (Tatars and Bolsheviks) fell out of European history. Today is the next shift of the milestone.

Russia turned to Asia, with Western illusions, it is over.

The change of ideologies occurred suddenly, prepared for a long time. A turn to the east was announced by the President of Russia; But the president expressed what worries the people - quite tolerate the yards of the West.

Western democracy was not loved, and its own “sovereign” democracy did not take root; Today, almost without hiding, they talk about the return of the Russian Empire and Eurasianism - instead of Westernism.

Democracy and liberalism - in the form in which they were revealed in our Fatherland - left a nasty memory. It was cynical time: the bowels of Russia were sold, constitutionally belonging to the whole people, and not at all to the government and not even to the state. It was a time when the gap between the poor and the rich man became irresistible. It was a time when the Russian people and Russian history were declared inferior substances, ridiculed the past. It was proposed to believe that Russian history is a draft sketch of the history of the western; You should adopt the skills of the West, and for this you need to sell your country. There is no logic in such a package, but it was necessary to reconcile with poverty as if in the punishment for the inertness of the nation and the evil that communism brought to the world.

Beaching communism, began to destroy everything Russian; The Russian was perceived by the world as the conditions for the emergence of a communist doctrine.

We conducted an operation in three strokes.

Firstly, it was declared that National Socialism has a response to communism, that the genocide on the racial basis is a response to genocide on a class characteristic. From a theoretical point of view, this is nonsense: Marx never called for the physical destruction of the capitalists - the triumph of communism is not at all associated with the existence of the capitalists - but it is due to the fact that the working class dies, and people become free. But they did not read Marx. Ernst Nolte, one of those who introduced the theory of parity evil, knew very well that he was not talking about Marxism, but about the practice of Stalinism - but did not go into the definition. They equalized communism with fascism.

Secondly, they created the theory of totalitarianism in which Hitler and Stalin were equalized; Tyrans are not more than Macedonian and Tamerlan - but they approved that these are personalities and phenomena of the same order. Generally speaking, the East and the West are not like anything, the processes in Europe are not similar to processes in Asia, and indeed the evil is not homogeneous. However, the comparison was approved.

Thirdly, they pointed out that, all other things being equal, the root cause of troubles in Stalin and communism, and Hitler was simply drawn. Thus, Russia was found guilty of the disasters of the century.

It was a necessary theoretical basis.

In the future, any humiliation of Russia was perceived as a struggle against totalitarianism.

Only an extremely naive person could have believed that Russia would not follow. It is impossible to humiliate the nation for a quarter of a century, plunder a giant country, announce its imminent collapse - and believe that the country will not answer in any way.

As the hero of the Pushkin’s “shot” put it: “You jokingly gave me a slap in the face, you jokingly shot me my fodder, they jokingly gave me a mistake. Now I have come to joke. ”

The hero of Pushkin did not kill the offender, only showed his skill, putting a bullet into a bullet, and left. Russia does not look at the hero of Pushkin.

Unlike Pushkinsky Silvio, Russia is not a romantic hero. The answer to thieves' liberalism was terrible. And - exactly according to the same logic, according to which, destroying communism, they beat in Russia - they made a mirror answer: rejecting liberalism - rejected the West.

2.

In fact, there was no liberalism in Russia - it was Asian liberalism, feudal liberalism. The front of the Bolotnaya Square for abolitionism and anti -colonialism (and this classic of liberal thought) was not similar. They fought for estate privileges for the fate of the “creative class” were different than the fate of ordinary people who were called “anchovies”. The classical struggle of barons with absolutism - was expressed today in the contrast of corporate morality - common fate; In the corporate world, both the state and the people were perceived as corporations, and not successful corporations. The state was invited to take the role of an official in relation to corporate morality, and the people realized that the people would soon be offered to leave the stage. People were not so far from the truth: they quoted the ill -fated statement that thirty million who did not fit into the market should blame themselves. The population took the side of absolutism, and the offended front of the Baronov called the population - "cattle". In this way, an exceptional resource of popular anger was created - it had to be used once.

Tyrania always comes on the shoulders of flabby liberalism, the process is described even in ancient philosophy: the tyrant holds out a hand to the people over the heads of the oligarch thieves, the tyrant speaks of the glory of the Fatherland, and the people applauded: people were delivered from compradorism. Corporate intellectuals betrayed the backgole; The capitalists and the service of the intelligentsia took part in the ridicule of domestic history - and now, on top of the corporations, rejecting the moral of capital, the nation wished to unite around the leader and give battle to the world of profit. The world of profit is a foreign story imposed on us from outside; Alive in the memory of the community world - poor, but honest, as it seems now - socialist life. The nomenclature, socialism, the bar of the serf system (as it seems today) in trusting relations with the people - the symphony of power and the people - is not the meanness of someone else's corporate morality.

However, nothing was returned; privatization was not canceled, no nationalization of the subsoil did not occur; Tyrania never rejects the conquest of the oligarchy - the conquest of the oligarchy of tyranny simply appropriates. How the people had nothing - nothing will happen; However, there is a minute celebration over the offender, there is a catharsis of unity. The spiritual upsurge was strengthened by the fact that the people were made to understand that the centralized power is ready to declare war on the external enemy - for the sake of saving him, people, interests. The people were told what the name of the common enemy is, what the enemy wants, what the fifth column serves, which the banner is to gather around.

The name of what the people protects in the war was sounded - this is Eurasia. The word is significant, majestic.

Sometimes they say “Russian world”, but they mean, according to the poet, the “Russian Sea”, which is wider than Russia itself, Slavic streams will merge in it. This sea is great, it is the Eurasian Sea - it opposes the Atlantic Ocean.

The Russian world, Eurasia, the Russian Empire - these expressions are used as mutually replaced. Some doubted: why fight for the empire - after all, the empire does not imply. They explained: first it is necessary to build an empire - and social justice will be followed. The main thing today is to defend Eurasia.

They explained what is the difference between Eurasia and Atlantic civilization.

The Eurasian idea is the idea of ​​folk spirituality, the Eurasian symphony is opposed by the materialistic civilization of Atlantism. The mission of Eurasianism is the introduction of collegiality into the world - this will happen on the grounds that the world lies in evil, and Eurasia lies in good. The Western culture (in fact, the Slavophile of the Hams of the Hamber) “destroyed” the Roman heritage, aristocracy, statehood based on violence. Western culture, which once boasted before the Slavic world, is an aggressive accumulation of vices. Europe today is a miserable spectacle - it is customary to call it a geyropus, emphasizing the commitment of non -traditional sexual orientation; Europe is dying, its historical mission is completed. The Slavic world, which is the center of Eurasia, is young and healthy; It is based on the primacy of moral freedom. The reason for the moral freedom of Slavs (as the Slavophiles believed) are the national character traits of the Slavs: peace, susceptibility to the stranger, responsiveness, and the ability to change. The struggle began in inevitable: the history of mankind, according to Khomyakov’s concept, is the struggle of the polar worlds (Khomyakov called the forces “Irania” and Kushitsv, but in the future, different ideologists, describing the same conditional ideologist, substitute other terms of a common nature - “struggle of civilizations”, “struggle of ethnic groups”, etc.).

What proved the peacefulness of the Slavs, and whether this quality will definitely be in demand when they capture the outside world is unknown. This truth is from the category of those that are comprehended through faith. Why peacefulness and susceptibility to someone else's should be the basis for the reasoning of strangers - this is not spelled out in the works; However, “susceptibility to a stranger” can be considered from the point of view of susceptibility to foreign territory. Whether Europe is precisely the land destroyed by vices, whether Russian statehood is precisely more moral than Roman statehood - nothing has been proved. In any case, it was clear to Khomyakov that Russia should play a world-historical role in the renewal of mankind. The good prophecy was all the more delightful to listen to that at the moment when it was pronounced, Russia did not play the roles of the liberator, but on the contrary - it was a society with indefinite slavery (unlike all of Europe that Russia was going to teach the benefit, serfdom at that time in Russia still existed) and was called the “world gendarme”. However, the consciousness that in the future the power will certainly bless the whole world encouraged patriots. Save the world by conquering it and introduce peace through conquest - here is a contradiction; But the contradictions did not notice. You do not see that our villages will die; Tomorrow we will teach everyone around world love: “Love as our blood loves, none of you loves you”! This is the great: “Tomorrow we will free you from you” formed the basis of the great mystical teaching.

“So, healing the disease of the vice
Conscious, sorrow and shame,
Before the world you will become high
In the shine new and saint! " -

So writes about the upcoming Russia Slavophile Alexei Khomyakov about Russia. Whether domestic changes will occur in Russia, doesn’t write about this Khomyakov. It is not entirely clear that the healing of European defects will take place before Russian vices are aged, or the doctor’s own health is not a prerequisite for treatment. The reasoning of the sinful world to repentance is the usual motive of patriotic lyrics:

“We came to help you repent,
Consider the last shame!
Accept us, Suomi beautiful,
In the necklaces of transparent lakes! ”

So wrote the follower of Khomyakov, the Soviet poet, describing the invasion of the Soviet troops in Finland. “Heal the disease of the vice” of neighboring civilizations, to help the neighboring peoples to repent of their shameful being - this is the historical mission of Russia. Eurasianism has become a political continuation of Slavophilism, Eurasianism has become a new Russian ideology - Russia does not have another ideology today.

Orwell predicted the endless struggle of Eurasia, Atlantis and Istasia, replacing all ideology in general: they draw a simplified picture of the world without bothering themselves with details. Newspapers Izvestia, Tomorrow and Limonka, Television - today these means of information convince that the world is in a state of global wrestling of continents.

Citizens are always offered an abstract struggle - the more conventional camps, the easier it is to manipulate the consciousness of a citizen. Nasty camps are denoted in generalized: white - red; Catholics - Protestants; Socialists are capitalists. Today, even a dense person understands that the fight against rebellious Ukraine is a fragment of the great battle of civilizations! Today, a person is primarily an Eurasian, and then - a husband, father, an employee, a pensioner, a bank depositor, etc. The layman may be curious what exactly is offered to him for.

3.

Fluffs are confident that a meat grinder is needed in the struggle for ideals.

The “fascism” of a smaller country, manifested in relation to a country armed with nuclear weapons, is absurd - but make it clear that we are talking about the fight against fascism of a new type. There is a battle with the American world hegemony, which is today called a variety of fascism. Today, “fascism”, “Russophobia” is the ideology of a large Atlantic education, to which Ukraine allegedly joined. Thus, the struggle goes with Ukraine, but symbolizes the fight of Russia with the world of Atlantism. The saying “Beat your own, so that strangers are afraid” became a political program.

The situation is interesting to the symbiosis of prologues of the First and Second World Wars: we are talking about protecting capitalist calculations - but the imperialist war is issued for the struggle of worldviews. In reality, the ideals of the owners of concerns (American, Ukrainian and Russian) do not differ. But the First World War wants to see the ideological causes of World War II in its greedy reasons. It is said that they can capture Russia - however, they do not explain what they will do with the country if the country is captured. Probably the shrines will be destroyed and the language will be destroyed - however, the culture has already been destroyed by its own efforts. Since there are no plans for the new Russian population, it is possible that we are talking about economic slavery that cannot be allowed. However, the bulk of the Russian population and without a global war is in economic slavery-probably, we should talk about some kind of super-science, about such a dictatorship that the workers of the Cherepovets have not yet seen from their current owners. This is a rather slurred threat. But they believe in it, the Eurasian ideology interprets the threat in detail.

“Eurasianism” became the working ideology of the future war - and drew a deployment. The new Eurasian A. Dugin outlined geographical goals, he speaks of a “cycle of expansion of borders exceeding the previous maximum limits” these rhythms of expanding the boundaries “resemble a heartbeat” “Each next extension increased the total size of Russia. Dugin wrote the textbook “Social Studies”: “The idea of“ Big Russia ”is a projection into the future of an objective analysis of the past of the Russian people and the logic of its history”

The scale of the influence of the new Russia "must exceed the boundaries of the influence of the Soviet Union." This is "not nostalgia for the past, but a look into the future." When the vertical of power is strengthened, the boundaries will expand, then the Russian “traditional society” will fully win the Atlantic “modern society”. It sounds somewhat generalized - but cards are attached.

The layman has confidence that he was presented with a utilitarian aspect of “Eurasianism” (expansion of territories, access to the warm seas, etc.), and in addition to practical, there is also a theoretical, philosophical Eurasianism that a citizen does not necessarily know, which he will not understand due to the complexity of ideas, but which explains everything. There, in this complex philosophical Eurasianism, the abysses of hidden truths are opened and the spirit makes an ascent into the mountains. It describes about Logos and Aidos, about tradition and theodics, about phenomena and noumena; And the citizen in an accessible form set forth the practical essence of the issue - they say, Ukrov must be wetted. And the citizen believes that the priests and politicians themselves operate with high mental Eurasianism, and bring practical consequences to the warriors. There is, a citizen thinks, the great philosophy of Eurasianism, here, to her, to the origins, we have now clung. And, I must say, modern “Eurasians” support this consideration in citizens, speaking of “devoted”, “priests and kshatriyas” of esoteric knowledge, and primordial revelations - many mysterious words are pronounced, behind which nothing is worth it. And above all - there is no knowledge and philosophy behind this.

It is important to understand the following: philosophy, in principle, denies secrets. When they tell you about some secret mystical knowledge for the initiates, then be sure that this has no philosophy, and cannot have the slightest relationship. Philosophy, by the definition of its activities, seeks to understand the world, every phenomenon seeks to interpret and explain without embarrassment of simple words. The pathos of philosophy is in understanding and in explanation. All that Socrates did is to eliminate mystimations and stereotypes of judgments, the requirement to understand, compare, find accurate definitions of the essence of things. All that Kant was doing is reasonable evidence of moral imperatives; All that Hegel was doing is a reasonable explanation of reality. The field of philosophy is everything that is within the mind, and although the word Eidos sounds mysterious, there is no riddle in this concept: Aidos is just the concentration of many meanings, it is an atom that philosophy constantly breaks down, discussing and proving rationality or apparently. Philosophy does not recognize secrets. Moreover, the Christian religion does not recognize secrets and mysticism.

The sacrament is not a secret. The pathos of Thomas Aquinas is to affirm the spiritual faith with knowledge and understanding - there is no outside awareness and understanding of faith.

By virtue of what was said, no “philosophy of Eurasianism” exists. Eurasianism is based on a mystical understanding of the reality given by the elected, imputed by the priests, a representation that has neither a single support - neither geographical, nor social, nor historical. And, of course, there is no categorical reasoning.

Guru of modern Eurasians (in particular, Eurasians) is a mystic Rene Gennon, who hated the systemic concepts of Western civilization and spoke of “primordial” knowledge, truths in revelations that existed before academic knowledge. Of course - this has nothing to do with philosophy.

The reader should have been alert when Evolu, Parvolescu and Genon are indicated in the list of literature of the new Eurasianism, when they significantly report that this is an “Enigmatic, esoteric, conspiracy, secret and mystical” area of ​​knowledge. But all that - enigmatic and encrypted - seems extremely mental. And this is not at all the case, right the opposite.

As for the classical Russian Eurasianism, which arose in the 20s, this concept is ideological, there is no philosophical categorical reasoning in this science, and this is not a science at all, there are no scientific books on this discipline either.

The movement of the first “Eurasians” was short, and in addition to short collections of manifestos, nothing was created. At that time, many “intellectual” associations arose that issued a thunder -bowing declarations. The artist Natalya Goncharova, who published the manifesto, in which she “shakes the dust of the West from her feet and rushes the eyes to the east”, as a theorist and thinker, a little inferior to Trubetskoy-son. Formal “Eurasians” (Trubetskoy, Florovsky and TP) relied on the philosophical and journalistic heritage of the Slavophiles - Khomyakov, Danilevsky (rejecting, however, community and populism), relied on the nationalist journalism of Dostoevsky, used the rhetoric of their philosophical predecessors (as N. Trubetskoy - direct relatives), and, as it were,) Philosophical pages were added, written before - to their journalism. It is curious that modern journalism connects even ecumenist Vladimir Solovyov, who was inclined to Catholicism, who did not accept Eurasianism at all. We could talk about Eurasianism as a religious course, since the “Eurasians” in their programs rejected “system philosophy” and turned to the mystical ideals of the Russian path, which is revealed in the providential choice of Orthodoxy. But no theosophical treatises were written by the “Eurasians” at all. To some extent, “Eurasianism” is a political utopia, the story that the religious path of the development of society, based not on the mind, but on intuitive, will lead to solving social problems, will create a special path of the country. Of course, “Eurasianism” does not have any social and economic programs. The “Eurasians” hated socialism and the Bolshevik revolution, recognized the European catastrophe, and even the catastrophic of history designated as the cause of their union. But they did not have any their own programs, despite the brutality of general applications.

The pathos of the Eurasians resembles the pathos of Yesenin, who begins his poem with the words “Do not get fun of death, not copies of the rain, so said the Prophet Yesenin Sergey!” After such a heartbreaking principle, you wait for insights, instructions and recipes of being. But they are not. In addition to the menacing entry, nothing will be reported in the poem - further about poplar and birch. So it is with Eurasianism.

The modern “Eurasian” A. Dugin justified the lack of economic programs by the fact that Eurasianism is “ideocracy”, and “refuses to claim a special economic orthodox.” Generally speaking, the power of ideas could lead to the emergence of at least one idea of ​​an economic nature, but did not lead. The “Eurasian” explains, here are literal words: “Economics is a means, not a goal. This predetermines the parasitism of Eurasian teaching in relation to the economic sphere. ” So, in fact, the Mongols acted: they burned the forest and went on - but in the era of developed civilization the principle of parasitism is complicated.

Planning of the parasitic economy of Eurasian civilization gets along with the intention of capturing half the world, and the intention of treating the other half of the world from sins. Together, this is declared as a spiritual mission of Eurasia. Probably, it must be understood that the parasitic model will occupy half the planet, carry out ideological leadership, and the sinful part of the globe will work on enlightened rulers. Since Eurasianism never had a single intelligible plan, with the current state of the economy in Russia, it can be argued that there will be no economic plans in the future. But there are political plans - these are grandiose intentions; The population for the embodiment of these intentions is offered to give their lives.

How could specific socio-economic plans appear in Eurasia if Eurasia is completely none in nature? There is simply no such land, it is a mystical hypothesis - to isolate and isolate politically land, which are not connected by a general religion, economy and culture. Nikolai Trubetskoy (linguist by education) tried to conduct experiments on the development of a universal language on the basis of the Turkic - but this, of course, failed. As for the Muslim Christian-Buddhist religion, synthetic Asian-European culture, such a chimeric education is complete Galicia. Eurasia is utopia (and the crazy metaphor of V. Kimbursky is indicated by the utopian address), but unlike the Mora, the creator of the island of utopia, the authors of the Eurasia project (or “Island of Russia”) were not interested in exactly how the Eurasians would mine the daily bread. Is it possible to a combination of Asian and European production? It is too far and vague. Most likely, the Eurasians will sell oil, but who to sell oil when the whole world will be subdued?

It is amazing that Eurasia means appetites to that (and instead), as decides that it will do in the conquered areas. To organize the gambling zone - it only sounds flagrantly vulgar, in principle there can be nothing else.

During today's, the next enlightenment of Ukraine, the Russian writer-patriot Prokhanov exclaims: “A new society is formed in Novorossia, free”, etc. (At the same time, he expresses a desire to bring a krink of fresh milk to a soldier annexing Ukraine, so that the warrior “drank milky freshness”). Of course, you can not build any new society, a new economy. The worker of Ukraine will subordinate to the oligarchs of Moscow, and the worker will be explained that it is an honorable slave of the Russian master, and to be a servant of Ukrainian is bad. There will be the same, the only extensive feudalism in the immense territory of Eurasia. Since Russia, as the hell of incense, is afraid of federalization, the struggle always goes to eliminate rebellions, suppress free boyars, the approach of the boyars of the obedient, the creation of a system of subordinate feuds. The selection of lands by the arm of one king is the history of the country, there is no other story. We remember from the past not laws (every ruler changes them and nobody observes them), not the Constitution (which corresponds and interprets as you like), not a moral person who goes across the royal will - we remember only heroism expressed in the accession of new and new lands. The king has no idea what to do with the territory, rich, but sluggish - and throughout the history of Russia, economic impotence needs new territorial accessions, so that the illusion of growth, even if only physical, would be preserved. The immensely swollen space is obliged to live centralized, but the order coming from the center never comes to the outskirts, and there is no thought uniting this space - and will no longer be. And when it happens at the request of the writer-patriot and “the yellow-black ribbon of Victory soveens the globe”, this will only mean that the globe has died.

It is impossible to determine the size of the invented Eurasia - since it is not in nature.

Sometimes they report that Eurasia is, simply, Russia itself; This is a self -name of Russia, sort of like Albion in England. But more often it is said that Eurasia is an unclear that will arise when Russia joins other lands to its incredible territory. The sizes of the power, no matter how large it is today, is still not enough, but if you capture the Bosphorus and Dardanella, etc., then Eurasia will reign. And then? What will happen next? - Maybe ask the bewildered layman. Capture everything, and then? Further, apparently, enlightenment and fraternal love will come.

The General Eurasian development plan is curious to compare with the current situation in Donetsk. It is recognized that the self -proclaimed republic is the outpost of Eurasianism in the battle against “Atlantism”, however, it is impossible to say what a separate fighter is fighting for. For Eurasia, but for what kind of social system? Some of the militias proclaim the socialism and nationalization of enterprises; The leader of the Armed Forces professes the White Guard ideals and speaks of the Russian Empire; The Prime Minister considers himself an Eurasian, and the fighter Babay who managed to become famous dreams of creating a Cossack autonomous state. To what extent the aspirations of the workers coincide with the imperial concept, it is simple to answer: in no. Together, this is “Eurasianism”: semantic porridge.

4.

The history of the “classic” Russian Eurasianism is simple and short: after slurred declarations, the place of Russian Eurasianism in the historical arena was taken by the clear Eurasianism of German - and the Russian Eurasianism ended. “Heartland” (middle land) sung by Mc Kinder, was appropriate for Hausher and Hitler, and the Eurasian concepts of Russians looked against this background both amateurish and untimely. N. Trubetskoy dreamed of emigrating from Europe to the United States (I wanted to, we add to the Atlantists sarcastically), but did not have time to leave, died.

Eurasianism of the German edition - was defeated with Hitler Germany; Years later, Eurasianism was resurrected along with neo -fascism, resurrected along with the so -called “conservative revolution”, came again as an alternative to communism and at the same time an alternative to American financial capitalism. The “conservative revolution” - romanticized, turned to the conservative revolution from the romantic desire to resist the “civilization of consumption”, some seemed to be resisted by totalitarianism.

Many “fashionable” people became the Nazis - rock musicians and writers, political journalists and those who called themselves philosophers - they were such romantic fascism, the denial of the systematicity and violence of capitalism.

Anarchists and fascists get the city
Orders New!
Anarchists and fashionists, Young and Pretty
Marching avenue!

(Anarchists and Nazis took the city -
The orders are new!
Anarchists and fascists, young and beautiful,
Marching along the avenue!)

This is written by E. Limonov in emigration: the writer, watching the rotten market of the bourgeoisie, dreams of renewing society. And this update, almost always, romance is associated with fascism. But they fought not only with bourgeois, the systematic nature of the West is unpleasant, in which there is no place for the remote pressure of the “young ethnic group”. Gumilyov’s ethnogenesis turned out to be in demand here, and despite the flaws of the theory (so the decline in the “passionarity” of the British ethnic group falls on the reign of Elizabeth), accepted as given that the ethnos of Eurasia is younger. Why so - it is not entirely clear; However, they agreed to count like that. Any generalizations always sin - both “Atlantic” and opposition to them. The hostility of Tolkien “The Lord of the Rings” caused hostility, in which mythologically systematically shown how the humane civilized West is curbing the barbaric east - and the reaction is logical:

Remember, brother, how they crushed the elven scum?
How did their vile hordes run to the west?
We kneaded Gondor mud,
To shine brighter the white-stone Mordor!-

This is written by the writer Elizarov; Today it is more pleasant to be called an orc than an elf - since the elves represent the West, and the orcs and the Mordor robbed and humiliated.

And it came true at the request of the poet - they became orcs waiting for revenge for a quarter century of humiliation.

During the Weimar Republic, the Minister of Germany Ratenau exclaimed: "Germany was placed in a crazy house, and she went crazy." And they go crazy all the same.

It would seem a trifle: well, a person does not agree with the policy of the government. But today the government’s policy is equal to the will of the people - and the opposition became an enemy of the people. And the Fifth Column sounded! And patriotic housewives believed that the singer Makarevich is their enemy, it did not work out because of him, this poet Bykov does not give the colors of Russia! From the pages of the newspaper they appeal tomorrow: "Sovereign, where is your oprichnina?" And people build it - and do not blush. And they pray to the king: Father, not Tomi, start the war! How long is to humiliate in worship before the West?

Youth, healthy fascism, the fraternity of the strong, there is something inexpressibly beautiful in marching battalions. If you think about, what awaited the britow -headed boys in peacetime? - meaningless corporate existence. Office plankton was launched on cannon fodder - what is bad? It is better to die in the crater of the Eurasian volcano than to sour, counting someone else's margin! It is not clear what will happen later, when the romantic saga ends and Eurasian everyday life will begin - is it really possible to return to offices?

In those romantic and fascist years of the return of the Eurasian project, the young Dunin began to publish the magazine “Elements”, in which for the first time (for those years revolutionary) he spoke in positive tones about Hitler, explaining his Eurasian-anti-adulting! - Plan. In the magazine “Elements” published curious defytler texts (such as a conversation with Hitler of the Belgian leader of the fascism of Leon Degrel, in which Hitler was filed as the “last ancient Greek”, the fighter for ancient European civilization. The pathos of the struggle against Atlantism for Eurasia - this is the essence of the latest Eurasianism. The Christian rhetoric of the first The Eurasians (Trubetskoy - Trubetskoy) was invisible to the mysterious, mystical, enigmatic terminology - Odwal, there is superdate! “Elements” spoke of “primordial” knowledge, about secret revelations, about Brahmin of the new Eurasianism, about dedicated to a mystical spirit, which confronts the self -interest of the Atlantic pragmatic civilization.

The initial Eurasianism arose as a Christian search, the latest Eurasianism - longing for pagan. The new pagan Eurasians analyzed the reasons why the Eurasian project did not take place in the middle of the century. They came to the conclusion that a fundamental mistake was a quarrel of Russian Eurasianism - and German Eurasianism.

And at this stage, the Russian conservative movement began to fundamentally cooperate with European fascism - both in the person of neo -fascists and in the person of the right nationalist parties. In the very first numbers of the "elements" published an interview with Le Pen, with Alena Benoit, they did not stop there. When the wish was recently expressed to return to the spirit of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact in the confrontation of the “Atlantists”, this was no longer surprised.

In the modern Eurasian “struggle against fascism”, the first rows are occupied by Dugin, Prokhanov and Limons - but it is also important that there are Molotov with a ribbentrop next to them.

5

Eurasia is not a constant value - this is a developing substance, its development absorbs neighboring lands; The capture process is the possibility of existence. Actually, this is a military plan. In addition to the military, there can be no other Eurasia in reality.

The Chinese - represent the East, the British - embody the West; French - Europeans, Tajiks - Asians; And who are the Eurasians who are? If "the Eurasians were determined by belonging to the two regions of the world at once, to Asia and Europe, the Eurasians would be Russians, Kazakhs and Turks. But the problem is that the Eurasians did not complain of the Turks. The Russian" Eurasianism "meant the conquest of Istanbul (see Dostoevsky:" Constantinople should be ours), and the Alliance was not provided for with Turkey. Nothing the conditional space of Eurasia is united, neither customs, nor religion, nor crafts. The Eurasian is a mythical creature, something like a mermaid, a carrier of Eurasian culture - in nature.

There is Russia - a special education that serves, according to the “shield” block between the East and the West. There is a giant customs zone in which Western laws are converted into the eastern nature of power. Nine tenths (more precisely: fourteen fifteenth) of Russia is located in Asia and only the capital of the country is located on the very edge of Eastern Europe. Russia, in essence, is an Asian country - however, I want to challenge it.

The tragic Russian history gives reason to talk about Russia as a great, unprecedented, not like nothing. Russia saved the Western world three times, the conquerors drowned three times in its open spaces - at the cost of Russian blood, the West was saved three times. Russia is a great country, but it constantly seems to the Russians that others know little about their great greatness. And this is true - the gigantic body of Russia is of constant interest for the greedy West. Such is the peculiarity of Russian history and geography that the country cannot afford federalism, but cannot control its distant parts as well.

This is a contradictory fate. Several times it happened that it was Russia who headed other nations - this happened in 1812 and in 1917 - and the mission of Russia was liberation. But according to the bitter historical irony, this mission was replaced by the gendarme service, and the liberator became a swirl. The eternal contradiction-the verthai-liberator, the holy gendarme-this is Eurasia.

A myth interpreting the duality of Russia as a sign of chosenness is one of the most difficult in history. There were discussions about the Russian “All -City Council”, which connected the culture of the world, which is intelligible “and the acute Gallic meaning and the gloomy German genius”, but which can always turn to the West “its Asian erysipelas”.

Cultural and historical blackmail (recognize us with Europeans, or we will become Asians) arose long before the argument of the gas pipe. It should be assumed that the “All -School” did not understand the Gallic sense, since the criterion of rightness gives the presence of an Asian face - but neither the block nor Gazprom asked this question.

There is a mental passion, a wild offended passion and is a substance of thought. There is only one thought, it is repeated, talking to the destroyed economy and popular troubles: we, the Eurasians, will come and teach spirituality that has dilapidated Europe. Spirituality, forgotten and wasted by corrupted by Europe, has been preserved in the Eurasian steppes; Now we, the Eurasians will become new teachers of mankind. We are liberators when we are not a vertukha! This is as magnificent as a black square - and indeed, Malevich’s “black square” is the most accurate image of the Eurasian concept.

In relation to Russian society, to its real culture, Eurasianism plays a destructive role. As the ideology of Eurasianism and the penetration of geopolitics into church rhetoric is introduced, Russian Orthodoxy is inclined towards the national religion - which contradicts the plan of Orthodoxy. The Orthodox Church was not going to be a Protestant and nationalist church, but the union with Eurasianism leaves no choice. In essence, Dostoevsky played the role of Luther in Russia, nationalizing the Christian thought extremely. His militaristic “diaries of the writer” as “combat sermons against the Turks” of Luther are not an example of morality, but are designed to learn morality. In state policy, the Eurasian concept is rapidly evolving into “Russian fascism”, which was warned by Berdyaev, and Likhachev, and Solovyov. Russian people are pacifying arrogantly by the fact that once they defeated fascism, and therefore they have a vaccine from fascism. This is not at all like that. Fascism is formed from revengeism, from longing for the empire, from the unity of the nation and the ruler, from the unity of the people, achieved by the persecution of disagreements. And most importantly - from a mystical mission. It is the mystical mission of the nation, its Enigma and its “primordial” purpose - and is the condition for the emergence of fascism.

All of the above reproaches are perceived by the Eurasian propagandist painfully. The nature of resentment is formed by envy. What are they better? The pain of the Eurasians is to make claims to the countries who are lucky enough to be a full -fledged West, which form a "club of the elect." Why is it possible, but we are refused? Here England does what he does, and nothing, colonialism gets off! America is bombing-and we want to bomb something. Children's grievances in fragile souls of satraps lead to trouble.

Thus, the term “Russophobia” arose, describing the feelings of the “Eurasian” who suspects that he is not taken seriously. He can turn to the west of the Asian mug, capture half the European Europe, scare rockets, and he is still listed as a savage and a fool. And it will always be a shame - because the romantic concept of Eurasianism does not correspond to history; There are no battles between civilizations.

The fact is that the Atlantic civilization exists (this is a very conditional term “Atlantic civilization” - we should talk about the culture of the countries of the Christian circle), but there is no Eurasian civilization at all. There is no such civilization. There is Russia, but there is no Eurasia, and there is no Eurasian civilization.

Venedikt Erofeev described the hero’s experiences in the station restaurant. Looking at the menu, Venichka found that there was a “udder” dish, but the sherry drink is not served. And he was indignant: the udder, then, is there? But there is no sherry?!

The waiter replied: Yes. There is an udder. But there is no sherry.

This is the case, although it is offensive. Atlantic civilization is. There is no Eurasian civilization. For this annoying reason - the battle between them is impossible.

You can bomb half the world and take Constantinople and New York. However, it is completely incomprehensible what to do on bombed wastelands - what kind of love to nourish them.
And a significant question arises: if there is a project of all -winging love, then why not start the activities of Eurasianism directly from love, using it to begin with at least the nations?

To the question of Vladimir Solovyov "Russia Xerxes or Christ?" - Eurasianism invented an amazing answer, affirming the image of a satrap with professional ambitions, or basiles, or holding the Savior of mankind. I want a strong hand, but at the same time I want to believe that the hand with a whip is a saint. This political Gorguli is short -lived - the state in the modern world can only be built on the basis of equality, democracy and observance of international law. Any ambitions of the redistribution of the world, geopolitical mantras and fascist fantasies can win for a while - but will certainly be destroyed by history.

Liberalism and democracy were interpreted crookedly and obliquely, they corrupted the society, created the ground for imperial fantasies - however, when the trouble comes, history does not have any other solution. Only by democracy, liberalism with that Christianity in which there is neither Hellenic nor Judea - and the nationalist moth will be overcome.