Reconstruction of hell

Back in early May, I was not too successful to draw public attention to the fact that calling rebels from the east of Ukraine separatists means participating in propaganda mystification. They are fighting not for the department from Ukraine, but for the accession of Ukraine to the Russian Empire. It is Ukrainians who are separatists for them. For them, Ukraine is an illegal state that is unlawfully released from the empire. And Ukrainians are an illegal people, unlawfully spangled from Russian.

Then I could not assume that one of the current leaders of the rebels Mr. Borodai to such an extent word in word will repeat my article:

The boundaries of the Russian world are much wider than the borders of the Russian Federation. I am fulfilling a historical mission in the name of the Russian nation, a superethnos, fastened by Orthodox Christianity. Just like in the Caucasus, I am struggling in Ukraine against separatists, this time not Chechen, but Ukrainian. Because there is Russia, Great Russia, the Russian Empire. And now the Ukrainian separatists who are in Kyiv are fighting against the Russian Empire.

I really want to believe that the leader of the Donetsk rebels from Moscow is innocent in plagiarism. That he thought of this himself. That I did not help him and his associates in formulating my own ideology. Meanwhile, the liberal public, which is difficult to suspect in sympathy for this movement, continues to stubbornly call the rebels separatists. What is actually morally legitimized by the Mappers rebellion, facilitating its leaders with the opportunity to demagogically appeal to the people’s right to self -determination and put pressure on the sensitive places of democratic views.

In the enchanting interview, Mr. Boroday was noticed by Andrei Piontkovsky. A little earlier, Andrei Illarionov quoted an excerpt from the manifesto of the People’s Front of the Liberation of Ukraine, New Russia and Carpathian Rus. ” Here he is:

Is the struggle in the southeast (in Novorossia) separatism? No, the entire territory of Ukraine is the territory of the struggle ... We will create a new free socially responsible popular power throughout Ukraine and New Russia .

Whether anyone else commented on this "manifesto" is unknown to me. Meanwhile, this document is adultery. For example, in the future “social people's republic”, any private or collective initiative will be allowed, which benefits the people and its development, ”but“ prohibited by usury banking capitalism, living at the expense of a loan interest ”. It is immediately recalled that the contrast of “parasitic banking capital” “productive,“ labor ”and, of course,“ national oriented ”was a favorite technique of classical fascist movements of the 20th century. According to their "political economy", the alienation of the surplus product in favor of the exploiters does not occur in the field of production, but only in the field of credit. The Nazis borrowed this creative idea among the earlier right -to -conservative, “feudal” critics of capitalism, supplementing it with what national identification of the “loan interest”. To this, mostly all of their "anti -capitalist" rhetoric was reduced.

They also loved to talk about the control of the society of large conditions. The corresponding point is also available in the manifesto. That's all his socio-economic program. Unless, of course, the transfer of social guarantees, borrowed from such a hated, "liberal" Western world.

The fascist "anti -capitalism" was not directed against the exploitation of the workers of the elite, but against liberalism, humanism, the priority of human rights, legal restrictions on the authorities. It is very characteristic that in the manifesto, describing the system of "direct democracy" in detail through advice and referendums, no words say about political freedoms (words, press, meetings, associations, etc.). No "guarantees of personal integrity" should limit the "will of the people."

By the way, the bodies of democracy should be formed "on the principle of representation of delegates from territories, delegates from labor collectives and professional corporations and unions, delegates from political, religious and public organizations." Before us is the corporate state of Mussolini, Salazar, Franco, Peten and their less famous imitators. With the help of a corporate representation, they tried to revive the estate system of the Middle Ages.

The dreams of the "new Middle Ages" of the actual spiritual leader, and often a practical adviser to the rebels - the fascist Dugin, was analyzed by Vladimir Abarinov. The dorms of Dugin literally repeat the reasoning of the ideologists of the so -called conservative revolution, who formed the direct forerunners of fascism and Nazism. To justify these refined intellectuals and semi -digital aesthetes, who dreamed of the revival of the world of heroes who overthrow the wretched, philistine world of traders and consumers, we can say that they did not assume what this would result in. But we know. We know what attempts to revive "a society based on traditions, hierarchy and the dominance of warriors and priests." In the framework of this, according to Dugin, the “concept” of the behavior of the head of the rebellion is quite logical. It is logical that from the very beginning they completely abandoned any peaceful ways of political struggle. They did everything to exclude the very possibility of transferring the confrontation into a peaceful direction. In the "Society of Heroes", the political struggle is not conducted through negotiations, conferences and parliamentary procedures. Heroes should take everything with a sword. The possibility of political negotiations with the rebels, the possibility of compromise and coexistence with them is a separate difficult topic that goes beyond the scope of this article. But before starting a conversation on this topic, we must clearly be aware of what we have encountered. We must be aware that we are faced with a classic fascist rebellion.

The reconstructors and role -players who have not played in childhood in childhood, who live in the world of fantasy with its cult of medieval aesthetics, today are trying to destroy the wall between this virtual world and the real world in which we live. If they succeed, our life will turn into hell.