
To the questions of the TRV- science related to the load of university teachers , Yuri Averbukh , p . n. With. Institute of Mathematics and Mechanics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Associate Professor of the Ural Federal University ( part -time).
- You think Lee You Existing load V universities really beyond the maximum ? What situation In your university ? Changed Lee She is K. the best V The latter years , or , conversely , have worsened , or The remaining The same ?
- The load at the Ural Federal University is growing almost continuously. In addition to the purely “throat” load, which has grown, according to my subjective sensations, over the past 10 years, additional difficulties add various innovations. For example, it suddenly turned out that a task for a course design, including the topic and work plan on the course project. The plan is completely formal, but should be filled with hand.
It would seem that a useful idea - maintaining magazines of performance in electronic form - also led to an increase in the load. The poor implementation (including the lack of access to Wi-Fi) led to the fact that you can not put an assessment in the audience, this can only be done at the department, where one computer is for 40 teachers, or at home, i.e. Even if it was possible to quickly check the work, they still need to be carried to a stationary computer, undergo a long -term identification procedure in the system and gently introduce points.
It should be noted that in addition to the growth of the load, irrationality is growing. For example, many hours are devoted to home tests and calculation and graphic work. The abundance of these works, the real absence of the ability to control the independence of the decision in conditions when several hundred work should be checked for the semester, led to the creation of the “resolution” market.
Very often at the university, on the streets I see ads that the company is ready to do the calculation and graphic work in mathematics or mechanics. It turns out a strange situation when the teacher should spend many hours, checking what the employee of such a retrieved company, often a young scientist or graduate student, seeking any workshops for his salary/scholarships.
The growth of the load has led to the fact that most teachers barely have enough time and effort to spend mandatory couples and mandatory control measures, time often does not have enough time to develop methodological materials and consultations. There is a flip side; The readiness of most teachers every year to increase the load enables the leadership of the university to carry out reduction, which primarily affect part -time.
Usually part -time workers are employees of the Institute of RAS. Thus, on the one hand, RAS employees, while who have the opportunity to engage in science, leave universities, and full -time teachers are practically unable to engage in science. This makes our universities just technical schools. What promotion of Russian universities in international ratings can we talk? A significant part of the rating is formed due to the “scientific” component.
- What load You They counted would be optimal For Combinations scientific And teaching work ?
- I would pose this question wider. It is necessary to choose the optimal load for both teachers who are engaged in science and for just lecturers/practitioners who read their courses well. Often, it is on such teachers that the main load on the basic course lies, such as mathematics for technical specialties.
For teachers who are actively engaged in science, many colleagues consider the optimal load of 200 auditorrs per year; I myself have the same opinion. In my opinion, a slightly larger was the auditor's load on the half -time, at the time when I came to teach in 2003. I note that, teaching half -time, I had enough time to prepare a dissertation. In the current conditions, this would not have to be talked about. Probably, for pure teachers, the load can increase to 400 hours a year.