The court left Navalny under house arrest

The judge of the Zamoskvoretsky court Elena Korobchenko rejected the request of the representative of the FSIN to change the leader of the progress to Alexei Navalny preventive measure from house arrest in premises in the pre -trial detention center. This was reported on Twitter Politics.

The judge also rejected the defense of the defense of Navalny and his brother Oleg to return the case to the General Prosecutor's Office for the investigation.

At the preliminary meeting of the court in the "postal case", the representative of the FSIN explained the need to change the preventive measure by the fact that Navalny allegedly commented on the media in a criminal case against himself. The representative of the prosecutor's office supported the application.

Navalny himself noted that the request of the FSIN to arrest him is related to the publication of a document confirming the absence of "complaints from Yves Rocher.

“The ban on commenting on the case in the media is a legal absurdity, aimed only at making an unlawful decision without covering the press,” wrote Anna Vedita, spokesman for BRBA fund with corruption. “On what basis is the ban on commenting in the media? What is the state of state in the case of Yves Rocher? This is exclusively to hide the truth from all.”

On February 28, at the request of the investigation, the Basmanny Court of Moscowforbade Navalny to leave his apartment, use the means of communications and communicate with someone except relatives, investigators and protection. The basis for such a decision was the arguments of the investigation, which referred to the fact that Navalny repeatedly violated the conditions for the non -departure subscription - the politician was accused of leaving Moscow to the region.

On March 6, Supporters of Navalny called a provocation that previously appeared on the violation of the conditions of preventive measure . His accounts are now leading the wife of Julia (Twitter) and colleagues of the corruption fund (LJ and Facebook).

“It is obvious that the next step will be the SK's statements about the violation of the home arrest regime and the premises in the pre -trial detention center. Changing the conditional term for the real. An additional sentence in the fabricated case“ Yves Rocher, ”the authors of the post explained that they write on the first -person blog so as not to change the style of the journal. They added that in the absence of the most naval, they continue to conduct investigation, to engage in sociology, campaigning and developing bills.

On May 25, the head of the FSIN Office for the Organization of Penitentiarys not related to deprivation of liberty, Elena Zarebinskaya said that the FSIN suspects that Navalny was violating the conditions of house arrest using the Internet.

On Friday, the Zamoskvoretsky court repeatedly proceeded to consider the "postal case". On April 28, during the preliminary hearings, Judge Korobchenko issued a decision to return the case to the prosecutor's office . She considered incorrect qualifications of the actions of the accused, and also took into account a number of other violations that the defense indicated.

On June 18, the judge of the Moscow City Court Tatyana Solovyova recognized the return of "Postal Affairs" reasonable . Thus, the appeal about the decision of Korobchenko filed by the supervisory department on May 21 was rejected.

The first preliminary hearings on the "postal case" began on April 24 . Then Korobchenko extended to Navalny a house arrest for six months. The representative of the FSIN insisted on concluding a politician in a pre -trial detention center, stating that he had violated the conditions of house arrest, in particular, published entries on the VKontakte social network and gave an interview to The New York Times. However, Korobchenko rejected this petition.

Part 4 of Article 159 (especially large -scale fraud, committed by a group of persons by prior conspiracy and using their official position) and paragraph "a" of part 3 of Article 174.1 of the Criminal Code (laundering by a group of persons by preliminary conspiracy) were incorporated. The maximum sanction for the first of these crimes is 10 years of the colony, for the second - 5 years.

According to the investigation, over 26 million rubles belonging to the company Yves Rocher East, and more than 4 million rubles of a multidisciplinary processing company, stole fraud. In addition, the brothers accused more than 21 million rubles of legalizing.