
Even if in the mornings you like to drink coffee with milk, you are unlikely to guess what this time we are talking about. And we will talk about very related systems, the components of which, merging together, lose their original properties and usually in no simple way they can not be factorized back.
I will make a reservation, you can not factor at the macro level, just as you can not take a portion of milk from a cup of coffee or divide the glass of wine into white and red. Such a task is only possible for Maxwell demons, which are carefully, the molecule behind the molecule, they will sort: the coffee one - to the coffee room, and the milk - to the milk.
In social systems, the task is even more complicated. It turns out that such a demonic sorting begins to actively resist the system itself. As you guess, this, of course, will go about the Russian dissertergate, and in particular about how the Russian system counteracts attempts to separate linden scholarship from the present.
There is no need to go far for examples. Where did Igor Fedyukin disappear? The campaign to deprive the academic degrees of historians who received their degrees in the infamous Danilov’s dissertation council seemed to end, not having time to really begin. Then the system at a pace changed the legislation, legalizing an amnesty for linden scientists.
Recently, by order of the Minister of Education and Science, it was shifted from the post of rector of the Russian State Service forces L.V. Fedyakina. The basis for such an unexpected solution, including large -scale incorrect borrowings found in the doctoral dissertation of the rector [1] . How? “Demon” returned to the walls of the ministry and the officials finally decided to clean their Avigiev stables?
Something tells me that this is not so. Only in the capital is not to count the rectors of large universities with veil dissertations. All of them calmly continue their activities. Some of them have already been reported by a three-hobby. For example, the rector of NITU "MISIS" A.A. Chernikova [2.3] , or rector of Mati-RGTU named after K.E. Tsiolkovsky Dok. Econ. Sciences A.V. Rozhdestvensky [4] , or even a whole family-reception contract of Zabelin [5] , or the rector of the leading university in the country named after N.E. Bauman A.A. Alexandrov [6] .
Just the latter is a vivid example of how difficultly connected social system resists attempts to violate its equilibrium state, even if these attempts ultimately lead to its qualitative improvement. Most recently, Doctor of Technical Sciences A.A. Aleksandrov headed the list of laureates of the Prize of the Government of the Russian Federation in the field of education [7] .
If the reader hopes that this is rather an exception to the general rule, then this is far from the case. Among the laureates of the same government prize in the field of education there are other “clients” of Dissernet, which we have already written about [8] , as well as those we have not written about, but we will definitely write.
It would be unfair in this story to limit himself only to the capital. In the regions, in general, the situation is even worse. You can write volumes for this, but for our purposes we limit ourselves to only one striking example with which the reader already had the opportunity to get acquainted on the pages of the TRV-hobby [9] .
It was then about A.A. Ivanov, who, being a candidate of economic sciences, shortly before, “defended a doctoral in biology, consisting of a third of the“ candidate dissertation L.E. Sailor, completed and protected in 2005 at the All-Russian Research Veterinary Institute. " Dissernet has the honor to present to the reader and examination of the candidate dissertation A.A. Ivanova, in which other people's articles, a textbook and even a student abstract were used [10] . So, more recently, the Government of the Republic of Tatarstan awarded the scientist A.A. Ivanova State Prize in the field of science and technology [11] . The analogy is not traced?
Why did it come from the very beginning about strongly related systems? In our country, linden science has so closely intertwined with science in its original sense that together they turned into such a strongly connected system in which it is fundamentally impossible to factor from one another at the macro level.
This means, no matter how sad it is to state that at the same macro level both pseudoscience and science, having rafted, lost their original properties. All talks on how to determine which scientist (group, laboratory, university) is real, and which is fake, have a subjective shade in practice. Everyone will protect his clearing with all available methods.
It makes no sense to repeat that this problem comes down to a destroyed system of scientific certification. What are this consequences? All reforms in the field of education and science, no matter what they are carried out with good intentions, are doomed, since there is no single way (formal scientific meter does not count) to separate white from black, to remove the portion of milk from a cup of coffee.
1. Http://trv-science.ru/2013/11/05/cocialno-semejjnyjj-podryad/
2. Http://trv-science.ru/2014/01/14/vsegda-gotovy-na-podlog/
3. Www.dissernet.org/expertise/chernikovaaa2008.htm
4. Http://trv-sciense.ru/2013/09/24/aehrokosmicheskijj-trejjler/
5. Http://trv-science.ru/2013/11/19/drevo-dissertacionnykh-svyazejj/
6. Www.dissernet.org/expertise/aleksandrov.htm
7. Www.rg.ru/2014/08/11/premii-dok.html
8. Www.dissernet.org/expertise/utkinve2000.htm
9. Http://trv-science.ru/2013/05/07/zaraza/